University teachers and crisis e-learning Results of a Polish pilot study on: attitudes towards e-learning, experiences with e-learning and anticipation of using e-learning solutions after the pandemic

被引:0
|
作者
Tomczyk, Lukasz [1 ]
Potyrala, Katarzyna [1 ]
Demeshkant, Nataliia [1 ]
Czerwiec, Karolina [1 ]
机构
[1] Pedag Univ Cracow, Inst Educ Studies, Krakow, Poland
关键词
e-learning; crisis e-learning; teachers; university; attitude; experience; Poland; HIGHER-EDUCATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The aim of the research was to show the conditions related to crisis e-learning in Poland from the perspective of the experiences of university teachers. The research was carried out by means of online questionnaire among 94 employees of the biggest Polish state pedagogical university. The survey used scales measuring attitude towards e-learning, anticipation of e-learning use after the end of the pandemic, and experience with e-learning before switching to crisis e-learning. The research was conducted between April and November 2020 and the quantitative findings are as follows: 1) The vast majority of academic teachers positively assess the opportunities arising from e-learning; 2) Two thirds of respondents indicate that blended learning is the most effective solution; 3) Almost two-thirds of the respondents state that e-learning allows all of the established learning objectives to be achieved; 4) Evaluation of e-learning is not a homogeneous phenomenon, so teachers differentiate between elements related to assessing the value of e-learning; 5) The only feature that differentiates the effectiveness of the assessment of e-learning is seniority (weak correlation); 6) More than two-thirds of respondents had no experience with e-learning before the outbreak of the pandemic; 7) Evaluation of the properties of crisis e-learning has an impact on the use of e-learning-based solutions after the pandemic.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards a theory of e-learning: Experiential e-learning
    Beard, Colin
    Wilson, John P.
    McCarter, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY LEISURE SPORT & TOURISM EDUCATION, 2007, 6 (02) : 3 - 15
  • [2] The future of e-learning: e-learning ecosystem
    Uden, Lorna
    Damiani, Ernesto
    [J]. 2007 INAUGURAL IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL ECOSYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2007, : 273 - +
  • [3] Rethinking e-learning to e-learning 2.0
    Barroso, Julio
    Cabero, Julio
    [J]. CAMPUS VIRTUALES, 2013, 2 (02): : 76 - 87
  • [4] 用E-learning思考E-learning
    庄秀丽
    [J]. 远程教育杂志, 2005, (01) : 63 - 63
  • [5] E-learning and Adaptive E-learning Review
    Hammad, Jehad
    Hariadi, Mochamad
    Purnomo, Mauridhi Hery
    Jabari, Nidal
    Kurniawan, Fachrul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2018, 18 (02): : 48 - 55
  • [6] Bringing e-learning home: An experiment in embedding e-learning using departmental e-learning advocates
    Lucas, Brett
    [J]. Who's Learning? Whose Technology?, Proceedings, Vols 1 and 2, 2006, : 479 - 482
  • [7] e-LEARNING EXPERIENCES
    Markus, Bela
    [J]. GEOGRAPHIA TECHNICA, 2011, 6 (02): : 45 - 55
  • [8] Collaboration in E-Learning: A Study Using the Flexible E-Learning Framework
    Vandenhouten, C.
    Gallagher-Lepak, S.
    Reilly, J.
    Ralston-Berg, P.
    [J]. ONLINE LEARNING, 2014, 18 (03): : 127 - 140
  • [9] Living Labs in E-Learning, E-Learning in Living Labs and Living Labs for E-Learning
    Antonova, Albena
    Todorova, Korneliya
    [J]. THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE, SERVICES AND SEMANTIC TECHNOLOGIES S3T 2011, 2011, 101 : 147 - 154
  • [10] TOWARDS E-LEARNING QUALITY A Proposal of e-Learning Quality Model
    Cabedo Gallen, Rosa
    [J]. CSEDU 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED EDUCATION, VOL 2, 2010, : 455 - 460