Midterm Outcomes After Revision Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Single-Bundle Transtibial Autograft

被引:4
|
作者
Chen, Yi-Jou [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Yang, Cheng-Pang [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ho, Chin-Shan [1 ,6 ]
Weng, Chun-Jui [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Chen, Alvin Chao-Yu [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Hsu, Wei-Hsiu [1 ,7 ]
Hsu, Kuo-Yao [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Chan, Yi-Sheng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, 222 Mai King Rd, Keelung, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Sports Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Bone & Joint Res Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Comprehens Sports Med Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[6] Natl Taiwan Sport Univ, Grad Inst Sports Sci, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[7] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Sports Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chiayi, Taiwan
关键词
posterior cruciate ligament; PCL; revision; failure; knee; single-bundle; transtibial; HAMSTRING TENDON GRAFT; KINEMATIC ANALYSIS; PART; PRESERVATION; INSTABILITY;
D O I
10.1177/23259671221115423
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal technique for revision posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. Purpose: To evaluate midterm outcomes after revision PCL reconstruction using a single-bundle transtibial autograft. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We reviewed 17 patients who underwent revision PCL reconstruction performed in our medical center by a single surgeon from 2003 to 2016. The cohort included 12 male and 5 female patients with a mean age of 31.3 years (range, 17-48 years). All of the patients underwent single-bundle transtibial reconstruction using the same surgical technique and were reviewed at a minimum of 4 years postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative posterior stress radiography was performed. The preoperative tibial slope and tibiofemoral angle were also measured. Preoperative and postoperative functional outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective scores as well as the Lysholm score. Results: The most common factor that contributed to the failure of primary surgery was misplaced tunnels, especially on the femoral side. There were 2 patients who had grade 2 laxity preoperatively, and 15 patients had grade 3 laxity preoperatively. At the latest follow-up, all 17 patients had grade 1 laxity. On posterior stress radiography, posterior displacement improved from 10.8 +/- 2.1 mm preoperatively to 2.9 +/- 1.1 mm at the latest follow-up (P < .001). The IKDC subjective score improved from 34.9 +/- 6.8 preoperatively to 75.3 +/- 15.7 postoperatively (P < .001), and the Lysholm score improved from 38.1 +/- 10.0 preoperatively to 88.5 +/- 7.6 postoperatively (P < .001). All patients reached the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Lysholm score, and 94% reached the MCID for the IKDC subjective score, with 65% reaching the Patient Acceptable Symptom State. Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, arthroscopic revision PCL reconstruction with a single-bundle transtibial autograft offered satisfactory outcomes at midterm follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Autograft Anatomic, Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Ponzo, Nelson
    Del Castillo, Juan
    Fregeiro, Jose
    Kennedy, Mitchell, I
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2018, 7 (09): : E957 - E962
  • [42] Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Reply
    Abdalla, Rene J.
    Forgas, Andrea
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (09): : 946 - 947
  • [43] Revision single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with over-the-top route procedure
    Usman, M. A.
    Kamei, G.
    Adachi, N.
    Deie, M.
    Nakamae, A.
    Ochi, M.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2015, 101 (01) : 71 - 75
  • [44] Double compared with single-bundle open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaver model
    Whiddon, David R.
    Zehms, Chad T.
    Miller, Mark D.
    Quinby, J. Scott
    Montgomery, Scott L.
    Sekiya, Jon K.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (09): : 1820 - 1829
  • [45] Double-Bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Jarvela, Timo
    Jarvela, Sally
    CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (01) : 81 - +
  • [46] Transtibial Versus Anteromedial Portal Technique in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes of Knee Joint Kinematics During Walking
    Wang, Hongsheng
    Fleischli, James E.
    Zheng, Naiquan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (08): : 1847 - 1856
  • [47] Progression of Osteoarthritis After Double- and Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Song, Eun-Kyoo
    Seon, Jong-Keun
    Yim, Ji-Hyeon
    Woo, Seong-Hwan
    Seo, Hyoung-Yeon
    Lee, Keun-Bae
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (10): : 2340 - 2346
  • [48] Hamstring autograft maturation is superior to tibialis allograft following anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Kim, Sang-Gyun
    Kim, Soo-Hyun
    Kim, Jae-Gyoon
    Jang, Ki-Mo
    Lim, Hong-Chul
    Bae, Ji-Hoon
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2018, 26 (04) : 1281 - 1287
  • [49] Anterolateral Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Combined With Anatomical Reconstruction of Posterolateral Corner Insufficiency Comparison of Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Over a 2- to 6-Year Follow-Up
    Kim, Sung-Jae
    Jung, Min
    Moon, Hong-Kyo
    Kim, Sul-Gee
    Chun, Yong-Min
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (03): : 481 - 489
  • [50] Femoral and Tibial Graft Tunnel Parameters After Transtibial, Anteromedial Portal, and Outside-In Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Osti, Michael
    Krawinkel, Alessa
    Ostermann, Michael
    Hoffelner, Thomas
    Benedetto, Karl Peter
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (09): : 2250 - 2258