Towards the integration of urban planning and biodiversity conservation through collaboration

被引:2
|
作者
Wood, Greg [1 ]
Whyatt, Duncan [1 ]
Stevens, Carly [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England
关键词
Collaborative GIS; Commercial ecology; Ecological legislation; Development site; Planning; Biodiversity; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; GIS; URBANIZATION; COMMUNITIES; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eti.2015.08.002
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Despite aspirations to halt biodiversity loss by 2020 under the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, urban development continues to negatively impact UK wildlife and habitats. Reasons behind continued biodiversity decline are examined through the use of semi-structured interviews with ecologists, statutory regulators and land developers. It is found that despite strict legislation and best practice, for both planning and ecology, there is still much room for subjectivity regarding the protection of specific ecological features and the implementation of the mitigation hierarchy. Interviews also revealed that such subjectivity often facilitates the prioritisation of commercial over ecological benefits during site design. Furthermore, many felt an over reliance on the protection of individual animals, as opposed to maintaining functional connectivity for conservation of wider populations was detrimental to both the development industry and ecology. Our findings support the case for further research into the development of innovative geographical information systems to allow spatial deliberation, and collaborative decision-making between the three stakeholder groups. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 226
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: The effectiveness of surrogates
    Rodrigues, Ana S. L.
    Brooks, Thomas M.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2007, 38 : 713 - 737
  • [32] Comprehensive criteria for biodiversity evaluation in conservation planning
    Regan, Helen M.
    Davis, Frank W.
    Andelman, Sandy J.
    Widyanata, Astrid
    Freese, Mariah
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2007, 16 (09) : 2715 - 2728
  • [33] Planning for biodiversity conservation based on the knowledge of biologists
    Ant H. Maddock
    Michael J. Samways
    Biodiversity & Conservation, 2000, 9 : 1153 - 1169
  • [34] Planning for biodiversity conservation based on the knowledge of biologists
    Maddock, AH
    Samways, MJ
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2000, 9 (08) : 1153 - 1169
  • [35] Remote sensing for biodiversity conservation: Planning and evaluation
    Roy, PS
    CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF BIODIVERSITY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 179 - 197
  • [36] Environmental area conservation through urban planning: case study in Dhaka
    Nahrin, Kasphia
    JOURNAL OF PROPERTY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2019, 12 (01) : 55 - 71
  • [37] Land systems as surrogates for biodiversity in conservation planning
    Oliver, I
    Holmes, A
    Dangerfield, JM
    Gillings, M
    Pik, AJ
    Britton, DR
    Holley, M
    Montgomery, ME
    Raison, M
    Logan, V
    Pressey, RL
    Beattie, AJ
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2004, 14 (02) : 485 - 503
  • [38] Exploring perceptions towards biodiversity conservation in urban parks: Insights on acceptability and design attributes.
    Chinga, Javiera
    Murua, Maureen
    Gelcich, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF URBAN MANAGEMENT, 2024, 13 (03) : 425 - 436
  • [39] Reframing governance possibilities for urban biodiversity conservation through systemic co-inquiry
    Mumaw, Laura M.
    Ison, Ray
    Corney, Helen
    Gaskell, Nadine
    Kelly, Irene
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2023, 33 (05) : 517 - 530
  • [40] A window on urban sustainability Integration of environmental interests in urban planning through 'decision windows'
    van Stigt, Rien
    Driessen, Peter P. J.
    Spit, Tejo J. M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 42 : 18 - 24