FACT: An Open-Label Randomized Phase III Study of Fulvestrant and Anastrozole in Combination Compared With Anastrozole Alone As First-Line Therapy for Patients With Receptor-Positive Postmenopausal Breast Cancer

被引:202
|
作者
Bergh, Jonas [1 ,2 ,9 ,10 ]
Jonsson, Per-Ebbe [3 ]
Lidbrink, Elisabet Kerstin [2 ]
Trudeau, Maureen [6 ]
Eiermann, Wolfgang [7 ]
Brattstrom, Daniel [4 ]
Lindemann, Justin P. O. [8 ]
Wiklund, Fredrik [1 ]
Henriksson, Roger [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Helsingborg Hosp, Helsingborg, Sweden
[4] AstraZeneca, Sodertalje, Sweden
[5] Univ Hosp, Umea, Sweden
[6] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[7] Red Cross Clin, Munich, Germany
[8] AstraZeneca, Alderley Pk, Macclesfield, Cheshire, England
[9] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England
[10] Christie Hosp, Manchester, Lancs, England
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
FIRST-LINE THERAPY; PHARMACOKINETIC PROFILE; WOMEN; TAMOXIFEN; CONSENSUS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2011.38.1095
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare the effect of therapy with anastrozole versus a combination of fulvestrant and anastrozole in women in first relapse of endocrine-responsive breast cancer. Patients and Methods Postmenopausal women, or premenopausal women receiving a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, with estrogen receptor-and/or progesterone receptor-positive disease at first relapse after primary treatment of localized disease were open-label randomly assigned to a fulvestrant loading dose (LD) regimen followed by monthly injection plus 1 mg of anastrozole daily or to 1 mg of anastrozole daily alone. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). Results In all, 514 women were randomly assigned to fulvestrant plus anastrozole (experimental arm; n = 258) or anastrozole (standard arm; n = 256). Approximately two thirds had received adjuvant antiestrogens, but only eight individuals had received an aromatase inhibitor. Median TTP was 10.8 and 10.2 months in the experimental versus standard arm, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.20; P = .91); median overall survival was 37.8 and 38.2 months, respectively (HR = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.32; P = 1.00). Incidences of prespecified adverse events (AEs) were similar. Hot flashes were more common in the experimental arm: 63 patients (24.6%) versus 35 patients (13.8%) in the standard arm (P = .0023). Death owing to AEs was reported in 11 (4.3%) and five patients (2.0%) in the experimental versus standard arm, respectively. Conclusion Fulvestrant (250 mg + LD regimen) in combination with anastrozole offered no clinical efficacy advantage over anastrozole monotherapy in this population of individuals with a relatively high proportion of previous adjuvant antiestrogen exposure.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1919 / 1925
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fulvestrant alone versus fulvestrant and everolimus versus fulvestrant, everolimus and anastrozole: A Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial in postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive stage IV breast cancer: SWOG-Clinical Trials Ini
    Somlo, George
    Barlow, William
    Moore, Halle
    Gralow, Julie
    Schott, Anne
    Hayes, Daniel
    Kuhn, Peter
    Hicks, James
    Lew, Danika
    Tripathy, Debu
    Hortobagyl, Gabriel
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [32] The SABRE (Study of Anastrozole with the Bisphosphonate RisedronatE) study: The effects of risedronate on BMD and bone metabolism in postmenopausal women using anastrozole as adjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer - First results
    Van Poznak, C.
    Hannon, R. A.
    Clack, G.
    Campone, M.
    Mackeys, J. R.
    Apffelstaedt, J.
    Eastell, R.
    BONE, 2007, 40 (06) : S159 - S160
  • [33] First results of the SABRE (Study of Anastrozole with the Bisphosphonate Risedronate) study: The effects of risedronate on BMD and bone metabolism in postmenopausal women using anastrozole as adjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer
    Van Poznak, C.
    Hannon, R. A.
    Clack, G.
    Campone, M.
    Mackey, J. R.
    Apffelstaedt, J.
    Eastell, R.
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2006, 32 : S44 - S44
  • [34] Phase II, Randomized Trial to Compare Anastrozole Combined with Gefitinib or Placebo in Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Cristofanilli, Massimo
    Valero, Vicente
    Mangalik, Aroop
    Royce, Melanie
    Rabinowitz, Ian
    Arena, Francis P.
    Kroener, Joan F.
    Curcio, Elizabeth
    Watkins, Claire
    Bacus, Sarah
    Cora, Elsa M.
    Anderson, Elizabeth
    Magill, Patrick J.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 16 (06) : 1904 - 1914
  • [35] Independent central review of clinical benefit rates in FIRST: a Phase II comparison of fulvestrant 500 mg with anastrozole 1 mg as first-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer
    Lindemann, J. P. O.
    Robertson, J. F. R.
    Ellis, M. J.
    Menu, Y.
    Macpherson, E. J.
    Ghiorghiu, D. D. C.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 7 (02): : 282 - 282
  • [36] Randomized controlled, open-label, phase IIb/III study of lurbinectedin in combination with doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic leiomyosarcoma
    Cote, Gregory Michael
    Chawla, Sant P.
    Demetri, George
    Kasper, Bernd
    Jones, Robin Lewis
    Broto, Javier Martin
    Wooley, Joseph
    Weiss, Mia C.
    Tafuto, Salvatore
    Badalamenti, Giuseppe
    Carrasco-Garcia, Irene
    Peinado, Paloma
    Blay, Jean-Yves
    Boggio, Gaston
    Fernandez, Cristian Marcelo
    Nieto, Antonio
    Kahatt, Carmen Maria
    Zeaiter, Ali Hassan
    Le Cesne, Axel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [37] RE: "Cost-effectiveness analysis of fulvestrant versus anastrozole as first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer," by Ding H., etal.
    Telford, Claire
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2018, 27 (02)
  • [38] Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer: Overall survival from the Phase II 'FIRST' study
    Robertson, John F. R.
    Llombart-Cussac, Antonio
    Feltl, David
    Dewar, John
    Jasiowka, Marek
    Hewson, Nicola
    Rukazenkov, Yuri
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [39] Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant Letrozole Versus Anastrozole in Postmenopausal Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Final Results of the Randomized Phase III Femara Versus Anastrozole Clinical Evaluation (FACE) Trial
    Smith, Ian
    Yardley, Denise
    Burris, Howard
    De Boer, Richard
    Amadori, Dino
    McIntyre, Kristi
    Ejlertsen, Bent
    Gnant, Michael
    Jonat, Walter
    Pritchard, Kathleen I.
    Dowsett, Mitch
    Hart, Lowell
    Poggio, Susan
    Comarella, Lisa
    Salomon, Herve
    Wamil, Barbara
    O'Shaughnessy, Joyce
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (10) : 1041 - +
  • [40] Efficacy of Pre-operative Arimidex (anastrozole) compared with Tamoxifen (PROACT) as neoadjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
    Cataliotti, L.
    Buzdar, A.
    Noguchi, S.
    Bines, J.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2004, 2 (03): : 69 - 69