Applications of smart proxies for subsurface modeling

被引:27
|
作者
Shahkarami, Alireza [1 ]
Mohaghegh, Shahab [2 ]
机构
[1] St Francis Univ, 300 NE 9th St, Oklahoma City, OK 73104 USA
[2] West Virginia Univ, 345 E Mineral Resources Bldg,POB 6070, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
smart proxy modeling; reservoir simulation; machine learning; artificial neural network; history matching; sensitivity analysis; optimization technology; CO2; FOR;
D O I
10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60057-X
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques, we developed and validated the smart proxy models for history matching of reservoir simulation, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty assessment by artificial neural network (ANN). The smart proxy models were applied on two cases, the first case study investigated the application of a proxy model for calibrating a reservoir simulation model based on historical data and predicting well production while the second case study investigated the application of an ANN-based proxy model for fast-track modeling of CO2 enhanced oil recovery, aiming at the prediction of the reservoir pressure and phase saturation distribution at injection stage and post-injection stage. The prediction effects for both cases are promising. While a single run of basic numerical simulation model takes hours to days, the smart proxy model runs in a matter of seconds, saving 98.9% of calculating time. The results of these case studies demonstrate the advantage of the proposed workflow for addressing the high run-time, computational time and computational cost of numerical simulation models. In addition, these proxy models predict the outputs of reservoir simulation models with high accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 412
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling the impacts of diagenesis on carbonate paleoredox proxies
    Lau, Kimberly, V
    Hardisty, Dalton S.
    [J]. GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2022, 337 : 123 - 139
  • [32] IoT devices hardware modeling for executing Blockchain and Smart Contracts applications
    Kromes, Roland
    Verdier, Francois
    [J]. 2019 IEEE/ACS 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (AICCSA 2019), 2019,
  • [33] Smart sensor modeling with the UML for real-time embedded applications
    Jouvray, C
    Gérard, S
    Terrier, F
    Bouaziz, S
    Reynaud, R
    [J]. 2004 IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM, 2004, : 919 - 924
  • [34] Multiscale modeling in smart cities: A survey on applications, current trends, and challenges
    Khan, Asif
    Aslam, Sheraz
    Aurangzeb, Khursheed
    Alhussein, Musaed
    Javaid, Nadeem
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 78
  • [35] CYCLOSTATIONARY NOISE MODELING IN NARROWBAND POWERLINE COMMUNICATION FOR SMART GRID APPLICATIONS
    Nassar, Marcel
    Dabak, Anand
    Kim, Il Han
    Pande, Tarkesh
    Evans, Brian L.
    [J]. 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2012, : 3089 - 3092
  • [36] Comparison of Prandtl-Ishlinskii and Preisach modeling for smart devices applications
    Al Janaideh, Mohammad
    Davino, Daniele
    Krejci, Pavel
    Visone, Ciro
    [J]. PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER, 2016, 486 : 155 - 159
  • [37] A smart bionic finger for subsurface tactile tomography
    Li, Yizhou
    Chen, Zhiming
    Chen, Youbin
    Yang, Hao
    Lu, Junyong
    Li, Zhennan
    Chen, Yongyao
    Ding, Dongyi
    Zeng, Cuiying
    Zhou, Bingpu
    Liang, Hongpeng
    Huang, Xingpeng
    Hu, Jiajia
    Huang, Jingcheng
    Wen, Jinxiu
    Luo, Jianyi
    [J]. CELL REPORTS PHYSICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 4 (02):
  • [38] Modeling of the holographic subsurface radar
    Vinogradov, VA
    Popov, AV
    [J]. GEOMAGNETISM AND AERONOMY, 2001, 41 (02) : 245 - 253
  • [39] MODELING OF THE SUBSURFACE INTERFACE RADAR
    MOGHADDAM, M
    YANNAKAKIS, EJ
    CHEW, WC
    RANDALL, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES AND APPLICATIONS, 1991, 5 (01) : 17 - 39
  • [40] MODELING OF BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN THE SUBSURFACE
    LIJKLEMA, L
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 19 (07) : 1144 - 1146