Density estimation for positron emission tomography

被引:2
|
作者
Pawlak, B
Gordon, R
机构
[1] TRLabs, Winnipeg, MB 3RA 6A8, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Dept Radiol, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[4] Univ Manitoba, Dept Comp Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3A 1R9, Canada
[5] Univ Manitoba, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Winnipeg, MB R3A 1R9, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1177/153303460500400202
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PET (positron emission tomography) scans are still in the experimental phase, as one of the newest breast cancer diagnostic techniques. There are two traditional approaches to the computation of images from data collected in PET In the first, standard CT (computed tomography) algorithms are used on rays designated by pairs of detectors receiving coincidence events. The problem generated by this approach is that generally only the mean can be used by such algorithms. With the relatively small numbers of events in PET, and with Poisson statistics for which variance equals the mean, the noise sensivity of standard CT algorithms becomes limiting. This is exasperated further by 3D imaging with cylindrical arrays of detectors. Statistical CT algorithms take the variance into account. As in the list-mode approach, we consider each coincidence event individually. However, we estimate the location of the annihilation event that caused each coincidence event, one by one, based on the previously assigned location of events processed earlier. The estimated annihilation locations form the image. To accomplish this, we construct a probability distribution along each coincidence line. This is generated from previous annihilation points by density estimation. In this paper we present our density estimation approach to positron emission tomography. Nonparametric methods of density estimation are overviewed followed by numerical examples. Our goal here is to determine which density estimation approach is most suitable for PET.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 141
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Positron emission tomography
    Ericson, K
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 1996, 9 : 89 - 95
  • [22] Positron Emission Tomography
    Cistaro, Angelina
    Quartuccio, Natale
    Vesco, Sara
    Pagani, Marco
    Fania, Piercarlo
    Donati, Luciano
    Nobili, Flavio M.
    Duca, Sergio
    Carrara, Giovanna
    Valentini, Maria C.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 119 (07) : 1496 - 1497
  • [23] POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY
    LAMMERTSMA, AA
    FRACKOWIAK, RSJ
    CRC CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1985, 13 (02): : 125 - 169
  • [24] POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY
    TOWNSEND, DW
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS, 1984, 516 : 52 - 55
  • [25] Positron emission tomography
    Muehllehner, Gerd
    Karp, Joel S.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (13): : R117 - R137
  • [26] Positron emission tomography
    Wu, Jia
    Sarkar, Fazlul H.
    Singh, Harpreet
    Shah, Shishir
    IEEE Potentials, 1999, 17 (05): : 13 - 16
  • [27] POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY
    SCHELBERT, HR
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 3 (06) : 949 - 957
  • [28] Positron emission tomography
    Paans, AMJ
    van Waarde, A
    METHODS, 2002, 27 (03) : 193 - 194
  • [29] POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY
    JONES, T
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1988, 273 (2-3): : 455 - 458
  • [30] POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY
    COHEN, RM
    SEMPLE, WE
    GROSS, M
    PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1986, 9 (01) : 63 - 79