Silastic drains vs conventional chest tubes after coronary artery bypass

被引:24
|
作者
Frankel, TL
Hill, PC
Stamou, SC
Lowery, RC
Pfister, AJ
Jain, A
Corso, PJ
机构
[1] Washington Hosp Ctr, Sect Cardiac Surg, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Sect Cardiac Surg, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] MedStar Res Inst, Sect Cardiac Surg, Washington, DC USA
关键词
cardiac surgical procedures; comparative study; drainage/methods;
D O I
10.1378/chest.124.1.108
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objectives: To investigate differences in drainage amounts and early clinical outcomes associated with the use of Silastic drains, as compared with the conventional chest tube after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Design: Retrospective nonrandomized case control study. Setting: A tertiary teaching hospital. Patients and participants: Outcome data from 554 patients who underwent postoperative pericardial decompression using small Silastic drains were compared with those from 556 patients who had conventional chest tubes after first-time CABG at our institution between January I and August 1, 2000. Measurement and results: Univariate analysis of preoperative characteristics was used to ensure similarity between the two patient groups. Operative mortality, mediastinitis, reoperation for bleeding, and early and late cardiac tamponade occurred in 9 patients (1.6%), 6 patients (1.1%), 6 patients (1.1%), 6 patients (1.1%), and I patient (0.2%), respectively, in the Silastic drain group, compared with 11 patients (2.0%), 9 patients (1.6%), 4 patients (0.7%), 2 patients (0.4%), and 6 patients (1.1%) in the conventional group. No statistically significant differences between the two drains were identified. Drainage amounts (mean +/- SD) were 552.2 +/- 281.8 mL and 548.8 mL +/- 328.7 mL for the Silastic and conventional groups, respectively (p = 0.51). Postoperative length of stay was longer for the conventional chest tube group (median, 5 d; range, I to 119 d) when compared to the Silastic drain group (median, 4 d; range, I to 66 d; p = 0.01). Conclusions: We demonstrated that small Silastic drains are equally as effective as the conventional, large-bore chest tubes after CABG with no significant risk of bleeding or pericardial tamponade. Additionally, use of Silastic drains allows more mobility than the conventional chest tubes. As a result of this study, there was a change in our clinical practice toward the exclusive use of Silastic drains after all cardiac surgical procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 113
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of post-operative and pulmonary morbidity due to subxiphoid and midaxillary chest drainage tubes after coronary artery bypass grafting
    Selcuk, Ismail
    Selcuk, Nehir
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2023, 94 (03) : 219 - 225
  • [22] Myocardial ischemia after minimally invasive and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting
    Kilger, E
    Pichler, B
    Goetz, AE
    Felbinger, T
    Mörstedt, K
    Tichy, M
    Lamm, P
    Schütz, A
    Mühlbayer, D
    Frey, L
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (04): : U122 - U122
  • [23] Coronary artery surgery: conventional coronary artery bypass grafting versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
    Salzberg, SP
    Adams, DH
    Filsoufi, F
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 20 (06) : 509 - 516
  • [24] Generalized hybrid coronary revascularization vs. conventional off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease
    Zhang, Shuai
    Li, Ping
    Li, Guang
    Yan, Yunfeng
    Sun, Tao
    Lin, Ji
    Zhang, Chenhao
    Liu, Shuo
    Qu, Zheng
    You, Bin
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2025, 12
  • [25] Closed chest coronary artery bypass on the beating heart
    Kappert, U
    Cichon, R
    Gulielmos, V
    Schneider, J
    Schramm, I
    Nicolai, J
    Tugtekin, SM
    Schueler, S
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2001, 4 (01): : 88 - 89
  • [26] An audit of follow-up chest radiography after coronary artery bypass graft
    Karthik, S.
    O'Regan, D. J.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 61 (07) : 616 - 618
  • [27] The normative distribution of chest tube drainage volume after coronary artery bypass grafting
    Wynne, Rochelle
    Botti, Mari
    Copley, Deana
    Bailey, Michael
    HEART & LUNG, 2007, 36 (01): : 35 - 42
  • [28] EVALUATION OF RECURRENT CHEST PAIN AFTER CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-SURGERY
    WRIGHT, TW
    ROGERS, WJ
    MANTLE, JA
    RUSSELL, RO
    PAPAPIETRO, SE
    RACKLEY, CE
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1981, 29 (05): : A857 - A857
  • [29] Aortic Perforation Caused by Friction of a Chest Tube after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
    Yen, Chih-Chien
    Yang, Ya-Sung
    Liu, Kuang-Yi
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2010, 13 (03): : E159 - E160
  • [30] Chest pain after coronary artery bypass: Relation to coping capacity and quality of life
    Karlsson, I
    Rasmussen, C
    Ravn, J
    Thiis, JJ
    Pettersson, G
    Larsson, PA
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2002, 36 (01) : 41 - 47