Silastic drains vs conventional chest tubes after coronary artery bypass

被引:24
|
作者
Frankel, TL
Hill, PC
Stamou, SC
Lowery, RC
Pfister, AJ
Jain, A
Corso, PJ
机构
[1] Washington Hosp Ctr, Sect Cardiac Surg, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Sect Cardiac Surg, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] MedStar Res Inst, Sect Cardiac Surg, Washington, DC USA
关键词
cardiac surgical procedures; comparative study; drainage/methods;
D O I
10.1378/chest.124.1.108
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objectives: To investigate differences in drainage amounts and early clinical outcomes associated with the use of Silastic drains, as compared with the conventional chest tube after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Design: Retrospective nonrandomized case control study. Setting: A tertiary teaching hospital. Patients and participants: Outcome data from 554 patients who underwent postoperative pericardial decompression using small Silastic drains were compared with those from 556 patients who had conventional chest tubes after first-time CABG at our institution between January I and August 1, 2000. Measurement and results: Univariate analysis of preoperative characteristics was used to ensure similarity between the two patient groups. Operative mortality, mediastinitis, reoperation for bleeding, and early and late cardiac tamponade occurred in 9 patients (1.6%), 6 patients (1.1%), 6 patients (1.1%), 6 patients (1.1%), and I patient (0.2%), respectively, in the Silastic drain group, compared with 11 patients (2.0%), 9 patients (1.6%), 4 patients (0.7%), 2 patients (0.4%), and 6 patients (1.1%) in the conventional group. No statistically significant differences between the two drains were identified. Drainage amounts (mean +/- SD) were 552.2 +/- 281.8 mL and 548.8 mL +/- 328.7 mL for the Silastic and conventional groups, respectively (p = 0.51). Postoperative length of stay was longer for the conventional chest tube group (median, 5 d; range, I to 119 d) when compared to the Silastic drain group (median, 4 d; range, I to 66 d; p = 0.01). Conclusions: We demonstrated that small Silastic drains are equally as effective as the conventional, large-bore chest tubes after CABG with no significant risk of bleeding or pericardial tamponade. Additionally, use of Silastic drains allows more mobility than the conventional chest tubes. As a result of this study, there was a change in our clinical practice toward the exclusive use of Silastic drains after all cardiac surgical procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 113
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF MEDIASTINAL DRAINAGE WITH SILASTIC VS CONVENTIONAL CHEST TUBES FOLLOWING CARDIAC SURGERY
    Moss, E.
    Miller, C.
    Jensen, H.
    Basmadjlan, A.
    Bouchard, D.
    Pellerin, M.
    Carrier, M.
    Cartier, R.
    Hebert, Y.
    Page, P.
    Jeanmart, H.
    Cogan, J.
    Perrault, L. P.
    Demers, P.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 27 (05) : S193 - S194
  • [2] Less pain with flexible fluted silicone chest drains than with conventional rigid chest tubes after cardiac surgery
    Akowuah, E
    Ho, EC
    George, R
    Brennan, K
    Tennant, S
    Braidley, P
    Cooper, G
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 124 (05): : 1027 - 1028
  • [3] Predictors of chest pain after coronary artery bypass grafting
    Karlsson, I
    Berglin, E
    Pettersson, G
    Larsson, PA
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 1999, 33 (05) : 289 - 294
  • [4] Delayed chest wall pain after coronary artery bypass
    Nazem, A
    Nazem, H
    Nazem, N
    Nazem, S
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 1997, 39 (03) : 226 - 227
  • [5] The use of flexible silastic drains after chest surgery: Novel thoracic drainage
    Ishikura, H
    Kimura, S
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 81 (01): : 331 - 334
  • [6] Application of Lidocaine Jelly on Chest Tubes to Reduce Pain Caused by Drainage Catheter after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
    Kang, Hyun
    Chung, Yoon Sang
    Choe, Ju Won
    Woo, Young Cheol
    Kim, Sang Wook
    Park, Soon J.
    Hong, Joonhwa
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 29 (10) : 1398 - 1403
  • [7] Subxiphoid versus Intercostal Chest Tubes Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Pulmonary Morbidities after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Guden, Mustafa
    Korkmaz, Askin Ali
    Onan, Burak
    Onan, Ismihan Selen
    Tarakci, Sevim Indelen
    Fidan, Fatma
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 2012, 39 (04) : 507 - 512
  • [8] Limiting brain and lung damage after coronary artery bypass grafting: An alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass graft
    Runge, TM
    Runge, MS
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 27 (11) : 594 - 598
  • [9] AN UNUSUAL CAUSE OF CHEST PAIN AFTER CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING
    Saleh, Yehia
    Almaghraby, Abdallah
    Hammad, Basma
    Hassanin, Ahmed
    Elzawawy, Tarek
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (13) : 1195 - 1195
  • [10] Timing of chest tube removal after coronary artery bypass surgery
    Abramov, D
    Yeshaaiahu, M
    Tsodikov, V
    Gatot, I
    Orman, S
    Gavriel, A
    Chorni, I
    Tuvbin, D
    Tager, S
    Apelbom, A
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2005, 20 (02) : 142 - 146