A club's contribution to global climate governance: the case of the Climate and Clean Air Coalition

被引:17
|
作者
Unger, Charlotte [1 ]
Mar, Kathleen A. [1 ]
Gurtler, Konrad [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Adv Sustainabil Studies, Potsdam, Germany
关键词
REGIME COMPLEX; FRAGMENTATION; COOPERATION; REFLECTIONS; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-020-0474-8
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Not only is the climate changing, but so is global climate governance. Climate policy initiatives have proliferated within and beyond the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) regime in a polycentric pattern. Nevertheless, promised action under the Paris Agreement (PA) is far from being sufficient to achieve its targets of keeping global warming below 2 degrees C. A special research focus has emerged on international 'climate clubs', referring to a smaller group's greater ability to make progress in international climate policy compared to large global forums. Against this background, our paper reflects on the club functions of the Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC), a transnational partnership that aims at slowing the rate of near-term global warming through the reduction of short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs). How does the CCAC contribute to global climate governance and how does this relate to existing structures, such as the UNFCCC process and the PA? Researchers have generally found that climate clubs can raise ambition, produce emissions reductions, and/or enhance cooperation, while generating additional benefits for its members. However, their specific governance contribution remains rather opaque, for example, how emissions reductions are achieved. There is a lack of analytical application, knowledge of the political practice and of in-depth case studies of the clubs concept. This paper contributes to filling this gap by applying central aspects of clubs research, namely membership and size, public goods, and the provision of additional benefits as an analytical framework in one in-depth case study of a governance initiative that has not yet been the subject of academic scrutiny: the CCAC. The results are based on expert interviews and the analysis of strategic and academic documents. Overall, this research finds that the CCAC's largest contribution to global climate governance lies in preparing SLCP emissions reductions through raising awareness, orchestrating different actors and actions related to SLCPs, and establishing a large technical cooperation network. To some degree it also directly implements SLCP reduction projects. Ultimately, it complements the UNFCCC and especially the Paris Agreement. Members are part of the CCAC because its benefits go beyond climate change mitigation. Its large transnational membership constellation both supports and challenges its governance contribution.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Democratizing global climate governance? The case of indigenous representation in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
    Rashidi, Pedram
    Lyons, Kristen
    GLOBALIZATIONS, 2023, 20 (08) : 1312 - 1327
  • [32] The politics of knowledge in black carbon mitigation: Policy entrepreneurship of Finnish actors and the Climate and Clean Air Coalition
    Aalto, Pami
    Claydon, Anna
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2024, 161
  • [34] Global Climate Governance and Democracy: the Reconstruction of International Climate Institutions
    Zhang, Lily
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION INNOVATION (EBMEI 2013), VOL 18, 2013, 18 : 606 - 610
  • [35] Climate Engineering in Global Climate Governance: Implications for Participation and Linkage
    Parson, Edward A.
    TRANSNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2014, 3 (01) : 89 - 110
  • [36] Researching climate justice: a decolonial approach to global climate governance
    Wilkens, Jan
    Datchoua-Tirvaudey, Alvine R. C.
    INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2022, 98 (01) : 125 - 143
  • [37] A climate club to decarbonize the global steel industry
    Lukas Hermwille
    Stefan Lechtenböhmer
    Max Åhman
    Harro van Asselt
    Chris Bataille
    Stefan Kronshage
    Annika Tönjes
    Manfred Fischedick
    Sebastian Oberthür
    Amit Garg
    Catherine Hall
    Patrick Jochem
    Clemens Schneider
    Ryna Cui
    Wolfgang Obergassel
    Panagiotis Fragkos
    Saritha Sudharmma Vishwanathan
    Hilton Trollip
    Nature Climate Change, 2022, 12 : 494 - 496
  • [38] A climate club to decarbonize the global steel industry
    Hermwille, Lukas
    Lechtenbohmer, Stefan
    Ahman, Max
    van Asselt, Harro
    Bataille, Chris
    Kronshage, Stefan
    Tonjes, Annika
    Fischedick, Manfred
    Oberthur, Sebastian
    Garg, Amit
    Hall, Catherine
    Jochem, Patrick
    Schneider, Clemens
    Cui, Ryna
    Obergassel, Wolfgang
    Fragkos, Panagiotis
    Sudharmma Vishwanathan, Saritha
    Trollip, Hitlon
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 12 (06) : 494 - 496
  • [39] The fragmentation of the global climate governance architecture
    Zelli, Fariborz
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2011, 2 (02) : 255 - 270
  • [40] Rethinking Global Climate Change Governance
    Barrett, Scott
    ECONOMICS-THE OPEN ACCESS OPEN-ASSESSMENT E-JOURNAL, 2009, 3