Bioresorbable hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose membrane (Seprafilm) in surgery for rectal carcinoma: A prospective randomized clinical trial

被引:94
|
作者
Kusunoki, M
Ikeuchi, H
Yanagi, H
Noda, M
Tonouchi, H
Mohri, Y
Uchida, K
Inoue, Y
Kobayashi, M
Miki, C
Yamamura, T
机构
[1] Mie Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg 2, Tsu, Mie 5148507, Japan
[2] Hyogo Med Univ, Dept Surg 2, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
Seprafilm; rectal carcinoma; chemoradiotherapy;
D O I
10.1007/s00595-005-3061-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose. To evaluate the effectiveness of Seprafilm in preventing abdominal adhesions after radical resection of rectal carcinoma, and to observe whether Seprafilm had any adverse effects in patients treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Methods. A total of 62 patients participated in this prospective randomized clinical study, which was conducted to compare the outcomes of patients operated on with Seprafilm (SEPRA+) with those operated on without Seprafilm (SEPRA-). All patients received preoperative radiotherapy, followed by a two-stage operation, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based systemic chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of severity and extent of adhesions were evaluated at the time of ileostomy closure. The secondary endpoint included the recurrence of tumors, late complications, and outcome. Results. Seprafilm significantly reduced the adhesions in both the midline incision area and peristomal area. This in turn reduced the operation time, blood loss, and extent of the incision at ileostomy closure. Seprafilm was not associated with any postoperative complications or chemoradiation-related toxicity, nor did it affect recurrence or survival rates. Conclusion. Seprafilm effectively reduced abdominal adhesions in chemoradiated patients, and had no adverse effects on the oncologic results of fully introduced adjuvant therapy. Thus, Seprafilm is a safe and effective tool for use in rectal carcinoma surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:940 / 945
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Protection of trocar sites from gallbladder cancer implantation by sodium hyaluronate carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) in a murine model (vol 18, pg 246, 2004)
    Sasaki, T
    Shimura, H
    Tanaka, T
    Nakashima, K
    Matsuo, K
    Ikeda, S
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (07): : 1156 - 1156
  • [22] Preservation of the mastoid aeration and prevention of mastoid dimpling in chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma surgery using hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm)
    Refik Caylan
    Devrim Bektas
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2007, 264 : 377 - 380
  • [23] Subconjunctival sodium hyaluronate 2.3% in trableculectomy - A prospective randomized clinical trial
    Lopes, JF
    Moster, MR
    Wilson, RP
    Altangerel, U
    Alvim, HS
    Tong, MG
    Fontanarosa, J
    Steinmann, WC
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 113 (05) : 756 - 760
  • [24] A NEW BOWEL PREPARATION FOR ELECTIVE COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL
    WOLFF, BG
    BEART, RW
    DOZOIS, RR
    PEMBERTON, JH
    ZINSMEISTER, AR
    READY, RL
    FARNELL, MB
    WASHINGTON, JA
    HEPPELL, J
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1988, 123 (07) : 895 - 900
  • [25] Sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm®) reduced early postoperative intestinal obstruction after lower abdominal surgery for colorectal cancer: the preliminary report
    Chi-Min Park
    Woo Yong Lee
    Yong Beom Cho
    Hae Ran Yun
    Won-Suk Lee
    Seong Hyeon Yun
    Ho-Kyung Chun
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2009, 24 : 305 - 310
  • [26] Viscoanaesthesia in cataract surgery: a prospective, randomized clinical trial
    Valimaki, Juha
    Tornblom, Riikka-Maija
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2009, 87 (04) : 378 - 381
  • [27] USEFULNESS AND SAFETY OF SODIUM CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE AND SODIUM HYALURONATE AS SUBMUCOSAL INJECTANTS FOR GASTRIC ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE TRIAL
    Nakamura, Jun
    Hikichi, Takuto
    Watanabe, Ko
    Kikuchi, Hitomi
    Takagi, Tadayuki
    Suzuki, Rei
    Sugimoto, Mitsuru
    Konno, Naoki
    Takasumi, Mika
    Sato, Yuki
    Irie, Hiroki
    Obara, Katsutoshi
    Ohira, Hiromasa
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB182 - AB183
  • [28] A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing suprapubic with urethral catheterization in rectal surgery
    Perrin, LC
    Penfold, C
    Mcleish, A
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 67 (08): : 554 - 556
  • [29] ELECTIVE COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY WITHOUT NASOGASTRIC DECOMPRESSION - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    WOLFF, BG
    PEMBERTON, JH
    VANHEERDEN, JA
    BEART, RW
    NIVATVONGS, S
    DEVINE, RM
    DOZOIS, RR
    ILSTRUP, DM
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1989, 209 (06) : 670 - 675
  • [30] Colon and rectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation - A randomized prospective trial
    Zmora, O
    Mahajna, A
    Bar-Zakai, B
    Rosin, D
    Hershko, D
    Shabtai, M
    Krausz, MM
    Ayalon, A
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 237 (03) : 363 - 367