Diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis: Preliminary experience

被引:286
|
作者
Taouli, Bachir
Tolia, Anuj J.
Losada, Mariela
Babb, James S.
Chan, Edwin S.
Bannan, Michael A.
Tobias, Hillel
机构
[1] NYU Med Ctr, MRI, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Pharmacol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[4] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Hepatol, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
cirrhosis; diffusion; fibrosis; liver; MRI;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.07.2086
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our preliminary experience using diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Diffusion-weighted MRI with single-shot echo-planar technique at b values of 50, 300, 500, 700, and 1,000 S/mm(2) was prospectively performed on 23 patients with chronic hepatitis and on seven healthy volunteers. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured in four locations in the liver. Liver biopsy results (n = 19) were retrospectively reviewed by two hepatopathologists in consensus to determine stage of fibrosis and grade of inflammation. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the ADCs between patients classified with respect to having stage 2 or greater versus stage 1 or less fibrosis and stage 3 or greater versus stage or less 2 fibrosis. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to assess the performance of ADC in prediction of the presence of stage 2 or greater and stage 3 or greater fibrosis. RESULTS. Using a b value of 500 S/mm(2) and all combined b values, we found significantly lower hepatic ADCs in stage 2 or greater versus stage I or less fibrosis and stage 3 or greater versus stage 2 or less fibrosis. The mean ADCs (x 10(-3) mm(2)/S) with all b values were 1.47 +/- 0.11 (SD) versus 1.65 +/- 0.10 for stage 2 or greater versus stage 1 or less fibrosis (p < 0.001) and 1.44 +/- 0.07 versus 1.66 +/- 0.10 for stage 3 or greater versus stage 2 or less fibrosis (p < 0.001). Hepatic ADC was a significant predictor of stage 2 or greater and stage 3 or greater fibrosis, with areas under the curve of 0.896 and 0.896, sensitivity of 83.3% and 88.9%, and specificity of 83.3% and 80.0% (ADC with all b values, 1.54-1.53 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s or less). CONCLUSION. Diffusion-weighted MRI can be used for prediction of the presence of moderate and advanced liver fibrosis.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 806
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Liver Fibrosis: Diving into Microstructure with Diffusion-weighted Imaging
    Matos, Celso
    Metens, Thierry
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 313 (01)
  • [22] Assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in liver fibrosis
    Annet, Laurence
    Peeters, Frank
    Abarca-Quinones, Jorge
    Leclercq, Isabelle
    Moulin, Pierre
    Van Beers, Bernard E.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 25 (01) : 122 - 128
  • [23] Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of liver fibrosis
    Ayse Ahsen Bakan
    Ercan Inci
    Selim Bakan
    Suut Gokturk
    Tan Cimilli
    European Radiology, 2012, 22 : 682 - 687
  • [24] Diffusion-weighted MRI: In differential diagnosis of liver masses
    Ergelen, Rabia
    Sahin, Cennet
    Bal, Hacer
    Tuney, Davut
    MARMARA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 29 (03): : 145 - 151
  • [25] Diffusion-weighted MRI findings of treated and untreated retroperitoneal fibrosis
    Kamper, Lars
    Brandt, Alexander Sascha
    Ekamp, Hendrik
    Abanador-Kamper, Nadine
    Piroth, Werner
    Roth, Stephan
    Haage, Patrick
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 20 (06) : 459 - 463
  • [26] Diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: challenges and some solutions for the quantification of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion
    Wang, Yi Xiang J.
    Huang, Hua
    Zheng, Cun-Jing
    Xiao, Ben-Heng
    Chevallier, Olivier
    Wang, Wei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 11 (02): : 107 - 142
  • [27] DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI DOES NOT DETECT KIDNEY FIBROSIS IN A RAT MODEL OF FIBROSIS
    Boor, Peter
    Perkuhn, Michael
    Weibrecht, Martin
    Zok, Stephanie
    Martin, Ina V.
    Schoth, Felix
    Ostendorf, Tammo
    Kuhl, Christiane
    Floege, Juergen
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 28 : 194 - 195
  • [28] Diffusion-Weighted MRI Does Not Reflect Kidney Fibrosis in a Rat Model of Fibrosis
    Boor, Peter
    Perkuhn, Michael
    Weibrecht, Martin
    Zok, Stephanie
    Martin, Ina V.
    Gieseke, Juergen
    Schoth, Felix
    Ostendorf, Tammo
    Kuhl, Christiane
    Floege, Juergen
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (04) : 990 - 998
  • [29] Diffusion-weighted MRI in the evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary results
    Cova, M
    Squillaci, E
    Stacul, F
    Manenti, G
    Gava, S
    Simonetti, G
    Pozzi-Mucelli, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2004, 77 (922): : 851 - 857
  • [30] Diffusion-Weighted MRI of the Testes in Patients With Varicocele: A Preliminary Study
    Karakas, Ekrem
    Karakas, Omer
    Cullu, Nesat
    Badem, Omer Faruk
    Boyaci, Fatima Nurefsan
    Gulum, Mehmet
    Cece, Hasan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (02) : 324 - 328