Diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis: Preliminary experience

被引:286
|
作者
Taouli, Bachir
Tolia, Anuj J.
Losada, Mariela
Babb, James S.
Chan, Edwin S.
Bannan, Michael A.
Tobias, Hillel
机构
[1] NYU Med Ctr, MRI, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Pharmacol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[4] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Hepatol, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
cirrhosis; diffusion; fibrosis; liver; MRI;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.07.2086
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our preliminary experience using diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Diffusion-weighted MRI with single-shot echo-planar technique at b values of 50, 300, 500, 700, and 1,000 S/mm(2) was prospectively performed on 23 patients with chronic hepatitis and on seven healthy volunteers. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured in four locations in the liver. Liver biopsy results (n = 19) were retrospectively reviewed by two hepatopathologists in consensus to determine stage of fibrosis and grade of inflammation. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the ADCs between patients classified with respect to having stage 2 or greater versus stage 1 or less fibrosis and stage 3 or greater versus stage or less 2 fibrosis. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to assess the performance of ADC in prediction of the presence of stage 2 or greater and stage 3 or greater fibrosis. RESULTS. Using a b value of 500 S/mm(2) and all combined b values, we found significantly lower hepatic ADCs in stage 2 or greater versus stage I or less fibrosis and stage 3 or greater versus stage 2 or less fibrosis. The mean ADCs (x 10(-3) mm(2)/S) with all b values were 1.47 +/- 0.11 (SD) versus 1.65 +/- 0.10 for stage 2 or greater versus stage 1 or less fibrosis (p < 0.001) and 1.44 +/- 0.07 versus 1.66 +/- 0.10 for stage 3 or greater versus stage 2 or less fibrosis (p < 0.001). Hepatic ADC was a significant predictor of stage 2 or greater and stage 3 or greater fibrosis, with areas under the curve of 0.896 and 0.896, sensitivity of 83.3% and 88.9%, and specificity of 83.3% and 80.0% (ADC with all b values, 1.54-1.53 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s or less). CONCLUSION. Diffusion-weighted MRI can be used for prediction of the presence of moderate and advanced liver fibrosis.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 806
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient calculated with diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis
    Ibrahim, Heba R.
    El-Hamid, Azza Abd
    Tohamy, Ahmed
    Habba, Mohamed R.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 42 (02): : 119 - 131
  • [2] Diffusion-Weighted MRI for the Assessment of Liver Fibrosis: Principles and Applications
    Palmucci, Stefano
    Cappello, Giuseppina
    Attina, Giancarlo
    Sanza, Giovanni Fuccio
    Foti, Pietro Valerio
    Ettorre, Giovanni Carlo
    Milone, Pietro
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [3] Value of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Assessing Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis
    Sandrasegaran, Kumaresan
    Akisik, Fatih M.
    Lin, Chen
    Tahir, Bilal
    Rajan, Janaki
    Saxena, Romil
    Aisen, Alex M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (06) : 1556 - 1560
  • [4] Parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging for diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: Preliminary experience in healthy volunteers
    Taouli, B
    Martini, AJ
    Qayyum, A
    Merriman, RB
    Vigneron, D
    Yeh, BM
    Coakley, FV
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (03) : 677 - 680
  • [5] Diffusion-weighted MRI versus transient elastography in quantification of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic cholestatic liver diseases
    Kovac, Jelena Djokic
    Dakovic, Marko
    Stanisavljevic, Dejana
    Alempijevic, Tamara
    Jesic, Rada
    Seferovic, Petar
    Maksimovic, Ruzica
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (10) : 2500 - 2506
  • [6] Diffusion-weighted MRI of fatty liver
    Poyraz, Ahmet K.
    Onur, Mehmet R.
    Kocakoc, Ercan
    Ogur, Erkin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 35 (05) : 1108 - 1111
  • [7] Diffusion-Weighted MRI and Liver Metastases
    Chandarana, Hersh
    Taouli, Bachir
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 18 (03) : 451 - +
  • [8] Diffusion-weighted MRI of the transplanted liver
    Sandrasegaran, K.
    Ramaswamy, R.
    Ghosh, S.
    Tahir, B.
    Akisik, F. M.
    Saxena, R.
    Kwo, P.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 66 (09) : 820 - 825
  • [9] Diffusion-weighted MRI-based Virtual Elastography for the Assessment of Liver Fibrosis
    Kromrey, Marie-Luise
    Le Bihan, Denis
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 295 (01) : 127 - 135
  • [10] Diffusion-weighted MRI in evaluating liver fibrosis: a feasibility study in cirrhotic patients
    Girometti, R.
    Furlan, A.
    Bazzocchi, M.
    Soldano, F.
    Isola, M.
    Toniutto, P.
    Bitetto, D.
    Zuiani, C.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2007, 112 (03): : 394 - 408