A comparison of machine learning models for the mapping of groundwater spring potential

被引:35
|
作者
Al-Fugara, A'kif [1 ]
Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza [2 ]
Al-Shabeeb, Abdel Rahman [3 ]
Habib, Maan [4 ]
Al-Adamat, Rida [3 ]
AI-Amoush, Hani [5 ]
Collins, Adrian L. [6 ]
机构
[1] Al Al Bayt Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Surveying Engn, Mafraq 25113, Jordan
[2] Shiraz Univ, Coll Agr, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Engn, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Al Al Bayt Univ, Inst Earth & Environm Sci, Dept GIS & Remote Sensing, Mafraq 25113, Jordan
[4] Al Balqa Appl Univ, Dept Surveying & Geomat Engn, Al Salt 19117, Jordan
[5] Al Al Bayt Univ, Inst Earth & Environm Sci, Dept Earth Sci & Environm, Mafraq 25113, Jordan
[6] Rothamsted Res, Sustainable Agr Sci, Okehampton EX20 2SB, Devon, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Machine learning models; Groundwater mapping; Geographic information system; Variable importance; Jordan; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; RANDOM FOREST; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION; FREQUENCY RATIO; NEURAL-NETWORKS; GIS TECHNIQUES; WEST-BENGAL; RECHARGE; VULNERABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-020-08944-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Groundwater resources are vitally important in arid and semi-arid areas meaning that spatial planning tools are required for their exploration and mapping. Accordingly, this research compared the predictive powers of five machine learning models for groundwater potential spatial mapping in Wadi az-Zarqa watershed in Jordan. The five models were random forest (RF), boosted regression tree (BRT), support vector machine (SVM), mixture discriminant analysis (MDA), and multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS). These algorithms explored spatial distributions of 12 hydrological-geological-physiographical (HGP) conditioning factors (slope, altitude, profile curvature, plan curvature, slope aspect, slope length (SL), lithology, soil texture, average annual rainfall, topographic wetness index (TWI), distance to drainage network, and distance to faults) that determine where groundwater springs are located. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to evaluate the prediction accuracies of the five individual models. Here the results were ranked in descending order as MDA (83.2%), RF (80.6%), SVM (80.2%), BRT (78.0%), and MARS (75.5%).The results show good potential for further use of machine learning techniques for mapping groundwater spring potential in other places where the use and management of groundwater resources is essential for sustaining rural or urban life.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Enhanced machine learning model to estimate groundwater spring potential based on digital elevation model parameters
    Msaddek, Mohamed Haythem
    Ben Alaya, Mohsen
    Moumni, Yahya
    Ayari, Alaeddine
    Chenini, Ismail
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (25) : 8815 - 8841
  • [42] Application of Probabilistic and Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Potentiality Mapping in Damghan Sedimentary Plain, Iran
    Arabameri, Alireza
    Roy, Jagabandhu
    Saha, Sunil
    Blaschke, Thomas
    Ghorbanzadeh, Omid
    Dieu Tien Bui
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (24)
  • [43] Groundwater Potential Mapping in Hubei Region of China Using Machine Learning, Ensemble Learning, Deep Learning and AutoML Methods
    Bai, Zhigang
    Liu, Qimeng
    Liu, Yu
    NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (05) : 2549 - 2569
  • [44] Groundwater Potential Mapping in Hubei Region of China Using Machine Learning, Ensemble Learning, Deep Learning and AutoML Methods
    Zhigang Bai
    Qimeng Liu
    Yu Liu
    Natural Resources Research, 2022, 31 : 2549 - 2569
  • [45] Groundwater recharge potential zonation using an ensemble of machine learning and bivariate statistical models
    Jaafarzadeh, Maryam Sadat
    Tahmasebipour, Naser
    Haghizadeh, Ali
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Rouhani, Hamed
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [46] Effectiveness of machine learning ensemble models in assessing groundwater potential in Lidder watershed, India
    Ali, Rayees
    Sajjad, Haroon
    Saha, Tamal Kanti
    Roshani, Md
    Masroor, Md
    Rahaman, Md Hibjur
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2024, 72 (04) : 2843 - 2856
  • [47] Groundwater recharge potential zonation using an ensemble of machine learning and bivariate statistical models
    Maryam Sadat Jaafarzadeh
    Naser Tahmasebipour
    Ali Haghizadeh
    Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
    Hamed Rouhani
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [48] Future groundwater potential mapping using machine learning algorithms and climate change scenarios in Bangladesh
    Sarkar, Showmitra Kumar
    Rudra, Rhyme Rubayet
    Talukdar, Swapan
    Das, Palash Chandra
    Nur, Md. Sadmin
    Alam, Edris
    Islam, Md Kamrul
    Islam, Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [49] Groundwater Potential Mapping Using Remote Sensing and GIS-Based Machine Learning Techniques
    Lee, Sunmin
    Hyun, Yunjung
    Lee, Saro
    Lee, Moung-Jin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (07)
  • [50] Comparison of machine learning models for predicting groundwater level, case study: Najafabad region
    Pejman Zarafshan
    Hamed Etezadi
    Saman Javadi
    Abbas Roozbahani
    S. Mehdi Hashemy
    Payam Zarafshan
    Acta Geophysica, 2023, 71 : 1817 - 1830