Multiple transluminal gateway technique for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis

被引:213
|
作者
Varadarajulu, Shyam [1 ]
Phadnis, Milind A.
Christein, John D. [2 ]
Wilcox, C. Mel
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham Sch Med, Basil Hirschowitz Endoscop Ctr Excellence, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham Sch Med, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
NECROSECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1122
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Walled-off pancreatic necrosis often leads to severe clinical deterioration necessitating open debridement or endoscopic necrosectomy. A new EUS-based approach was devised to manage this condition by creating multiple transluminal gateways to facilitate effective drainage of the necrotic contents. Objective: To compare treatment outcomes between patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis managed endoscopically by a multiple transluminal gateway technique (MTGT) or a conventional drainage technique (CDT). Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary-care referral center. Patients: This study involved patients with severe acute pancreatitis complicated by walled-off pancreatic necrosis managed endoscopically. Intervention: in MTGT, 2 or 3 transmural tracts were created by using EUS guidance between the necrotic cavity and the GI lumen. While one tract was used to flush normal saline solution via a nasocystic catheter, multiple stents were deployed in others to facilitate drainage of necrotic contents. In the CDT, two stents with a nasocystic catheter were deployed via 1 transmural tract. Main Outcome Measurements: Resolution of symptoms, radiological findings on follow-up CT, and the need for subsequent surgery or endoscopic necrosectomy. Results: Of 60 patients with symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis, 12 (3 women, mean age 55.1 years) were managed by MTGT and 48 (12 women, mean age 55.2 years) by CDT. Treatment was successful in 11 of 12 (91.7%) patients managed by MTGT versus 25 of 48 (52.1%) managed by CDT (P = .01). Although 1 patient in the MTGT cohort required endoscopic necrosectomy, in the CDT cohort, 17 required surgery, 3 underwent endoscopic necrosectomy, and 3 died of multiple-organ failure. Treatment success was more likely for patients treated by MTGT than by CDT (adjusted odds ratio = 9.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-79.02; P = .04) when we adjusted for the size of the walled-off pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic duct stent placement. Limitations: Selective patient population. Conclusion: The EUS-guided MTGT is an effective treatment option for the management of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis because it obviates the need for surgery and endoscopic necrosectomy and its attendant procedure-related morbidity. Prospective studies are required to confirm these preliminary but promising data. (Gastrointest Enclosc 2011;74:74-80.)
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 80
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What is the Impact of the Proportion of Solid Necrotic Content on the Number of Necrosectomies during EUS-Guided Drainage using Lumen-Apposing Metallic Stents of Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis?
    Seicean, Andrada
    Pojoga, Cristina
    Mostean, Ofelia
    Bolboaca, Sorana D.
    Ilie, Madalina
    Rimbas, Mihai
    Gheorghiu, Marcel
    Lucaciu, Laura
    Bartos, Adrian
    Al Hajjar, Nadim
    Sandru, Vasile
    Constantinescu, Gabriel
    Seicean, Radu
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER DISEASES, 2020, 29 (04) : 623 - 628
  • [42] EUS-GUIDED PANCREATIC PSEUDOCYST DRAINAGE
    Yasuda, Ichiro
    Iwata, Keisuke
    Mukai, Tsuyoshi
    Iwashita, Takuji
    Moriwaki, Hisataka
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 21 : S82 - S86
  • [43] Endoscopic transvaginal drainage and necrosectomy of presacral walled-off pancreatic necrosis
    Aerenlund, Mia Prindahl
    Lindgaard, Lars
    Novovic, Srdan
    Lauritsen, Morten Laksafoss
    Karstensen, John Gasdal
    Schmidt, Palle Nordblad
    ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 55 : E940 - E941
  • [44] EUS guided versus percutaneous catheter drainage in the management of symptomatic walled off necrosis: a comparative analysis
    Samanta, Jayanta
    Dhar, Jahnvi
    Singh, Anupam Kumar
    Agarwala, Roshan
    Muktesh, Gaurav
    Bellam, Balaji L.
    Dhaka, Narendra
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Gupta, Vikas
    Yadav, Thakur Deen
    Sinha, Saroj Kant
    Kochhar, Rakesh
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 34 : 48 - 48
  • [45] EUS-guided Intervention In Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis (WOPN): Single-center Experience With Long-term Follow-up
    Sulz, Michael C.
    Meyenberger, Christa
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2014, 144 : 8S - 8S
  • [46] Safety and efficacy of the EndoRotor device for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis after EUS-guided cystenterostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ramai, Daryl
    Ahmed, Zohaib
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Deliwala, Smit S.
    Alastal, Yaseen
    Nawras, Ali
    Maida, Marcello
    Barakat, Monique T.
    Anderloni, Andrea
    Adler, Douglas G.
    ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND, 2024, 13 (03) : 165 - 170
  • [47] EUS-Guided Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage
    Giovannini, Marc
    TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 9 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [48] A Hybrid Endoscopic Technique for the Treatment of Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis
    Varadarajulu, Shyam
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 108 (06): : 1015 - 1017
  • [49] Transpapillary drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis - a single center experience
    Smoczynski, Marian
    Jagielski, Mateusz
    Jablonska, Anna
    Adrych, Krystian
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2015, 10 (04) : 527 - 533
  • [50] Non-fluoroscopic endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage of symptomatic non-bulging walled-off pancreatic necrosis
    Rana, Surinder Singh
    Bhasin, Deepak Kumar
    Rao, Chalapathi
    Gupta, Rajesh
    Singh, Kartar
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 25 (01) : 47 - 52