Vagus nerve stimulation intensity influences motor cortex plasticity

被引:58
|
作者
Morrison, Robert A. [1 ,2 ]
Hulsey, Daniel R. [2 ]
Adcock, Katherine S. [1 ,2 ]
Rennaker, Robert L., II [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kilgard, Michael P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hays, Seth A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Sch Behav Brain Sci, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Texas Biomed Device Ctr, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[3] Univ Texas Dallas, Erik Jonsson Sch Engn & Comp Sci, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Vagus nerve stimulation; Motor training; ICMS; Plasticity; Cortical reorganization; Motor cortex; LOCUS-COERULEUS; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; NEURAL ACTIVITY; RECOVERY; NOREPINEPHRINE; REHABILITATION; REORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION; LTP;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2018.10.017
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with forelimb motor training enhances reorganization of movement representations in the motor cortex. Previous studies have shown an inverted-U relationship between VNS intensity and plasticity in other brain areas, such that moderate intensity VNS yields greater cortical plasticity than low or high intensity VNS. However, the relationship between VNS intensity and plasticity in the motor cortex is unknown. Objective: In this study we sought to test the hypothesis that VNS intensity exhibits an inverted-U relationship with the degree of motor cortex plasticity in rats. Methods: Rats were taught to perform a lever pressing task emphasizing use of the proximal forelimb musculature. Once proficient, rats underwent five additional days of behavioral training in which low intensity VNS (0.4 mA), moderate intensity VNS (0.8 mA), high intensity VNS (1.6 mA), or sham stimulation was paired with forelimb movement. 24 h after the completion of behavioral training, intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) was used to document movement representations in the motor cortex. Results: VNS delivered at 0.8 mA caused a significant increase in motor cortex proximal forelimb representation compared to training alone. VNS delivered at 0.4 mA and 1.6 mA failed to cause a significant expansion of proximal forelimb representation. Conclusion: Moderate intensity 0.8 mA VNS optimally enhances motor cortex plasticity while low intensity 0.4 mA and high intensity 1.6 mA VNS fail to enhance plasticity. Plasticity in the motor cortex exhibits an inverted-U function of VNS intensity similar to previous findings in auditory cortex. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 262
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vagus nerve stimulation
    Pakdaman, H
    EPILEPSIA, 1999, 40 : 90 - 91
  • [22] Vagus nerve stimulation
    Kernich, CA
    NEUROLOGIST, 2004, 10 (01) : 57 - 58
  • [23] Vagus nerve stimulation
    Amar, Arun Paul
    Levy, Michael L.
    Liu, Charles Y.
    Apuzzo, Michael L. J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2008, 96 (07) : 1142 - 1151
  • [24] Vagus nerve stimulation
    George, M.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2008, 107 : S22 - S23
  • [25] Vagus nerve stimulation
    Lulic, Dzenan
    Ahmadian, Amir
    Baaj, Ali A.
    Benbadis, Selim R.
    Vale, Fernando L.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2009, 27 (03) : E5.1 - E5.5
  • [26] Vagus nerve stimulation
    Wheless, J
    Burgerman
    Ney, G
    Lesser, RP
    Richards, CD
    Brown
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 1998, 4 (09): : S495 - S500
  • [27] Vagus nerve stimulation
    BenMenachem, E
    BAILLIERES CLINICAL NEUROLOGY, 1996, 5 (04): : 841 - 848
  • [28] Vagus nerve stimulation
    Schachter, SC
    Saper, CB
    EPILEPSIA, 1998, 39 (07) : 677 - 686
  • [29] Vagus Nerve Stimulation
    Howland R.H.
    Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 2014, 1 (2) : 64 - 73
  • [30] Stimulation of the vagus nerve
    Veach, HO
    SCIENCE, 1924, 59 : 260 - 261