Post-disaster infrastructure recovery: Prediction of recovery rate using historical data

被引:37
|
作者
Barabadi, A. [1 ]
Ayele, Y. Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Engn & Safety, Tromso, Norway
关键词
Resilience; Recovery rate; Infrastructure; Robustness; Regression model; Bayesian approach; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RESILIENCE; SYSTEM; RESTORATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2017.08.018
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The recovery of infrastructure systems is of significant concern; in order to have effective risk management planning, an accurate prediction of the recovery time is required. A system may have different recovery paths due to the time of the accident, nature of the disruptive event, and surrounding environment, among many other factors. Hence, any model, which is employed to estimate the recovery time, should be able to quantify the effect of such influencing factors. Missing data, inappropriate assumption by analysts, and lack of applicable methodology are some practical challenges for recovery rate analysis. The purpose of this paper is to develop a methodology to address these challenges. It is based on the availability and the nature of historical data; it involves various steps, including categorizing the given data set into three groups: no or missing data set, homogeneous data set, and heterogeneous data set. Here, the Bayesian approach has been employed to handle the no or missing data set group. For the heterogeneous data set group, the proposed methodology suggested the application of covariate based models. Finally, for the homogeneous data set, the methodology employed statistical trend tests, to find the appropriate regression models. The application of the methodology is illustrated by real case studies. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 223
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social media data and post-disaster recovery
    Jamali, Mehdi
    Nejat, Ali
    Ghosh, Souparno
    Jin, Fang
    Cao, Guofeng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 44 : 25 - 37
  • [2] Post-Disaster Recovery Indicators and Recovery Patterns
    Wu, Jidong
    Li, Ning
    Ji, Zhonghui
    Gu, Xiaotian
    Fan, Bihang
    [J]. INNOVATIVE THEORIES AND METHODS FOR RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2012, 21 : 177 - 182
  • [3] The use of RFID tags to support the post-disaster recovery of utility infrastructure
    Sankar, Chetan S.
    Rushing, Bill
    Lauderdale, Corley L.
    Henderson, Steve
    [J]. International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 2016, 15 (04) : 333 - 345
  • [4] Post-disaster Gulf Coast Recovery Using Telehealth
    Kim, Thomas J.
    Arrieta, Martha I.
    Eastburn, Sasha L.
    Icenogle, Marjorie L.
    Slagle, Michelle
    Nuriddin, Azizeh H.
    Brantley, Katrina M.
    Foreman, Rachel D.
    Buckner, Ayanna V.
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2013, 19 (03) : 200 - 210
  • [5] Post-disaster recovery: the challenge of anticipation
    Moatty, Annabelle
    Vinet, Freddy
    [J]. 3RD EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT (FLOODRISK 2016), 2016, 7
  • [6] Chain tourism in post-disaster recovery
    Zavar, Elyse
    Lavy, Brendan L.
    Hagelman, Ronald R., III
    [J]. TOURIST STUDIES, 2020, 20 (04) : 429 - 449
  • [7] Estimating lifeline resilience factors using post-disaster business recovery data
    Liu, Huan
    Tatano, Hirokazu
    Kajitani, Yoshio
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2021, 37 (02) : 567 - 586
  • [8] Information Deficits and Post-Disaster Recovery
    Arneson, Erin
    Deniz, Derya
    Javernick-Will, Amy
    Liel, Abbie
    Dashti, Shideh
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2016: OLD AND NEW CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES CONVERGE IN HISTORIC SAN JUAN, 2016, : 1546 - 1555
  • [9] Critical success factors for post-disaster infrastructure recovery Learning from the Canterbury (NZ) earthquake recovery
    Liu, Miao
    Scheepbouwer, Eric
    Giovinazzi, Sonia
    [J]. DISASTER PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 25 (05) : 685 - 700
  • [10] A coordinated repair routing problem for post-disaster recovery of interdependent infrastructure networks
    Eren Atsiz
    Burcu Balcik
    Dilek Gunnec
    Busra Uydasoglu Sevindik
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2022, 319 : 41 - 71