Rigorous simulation and techno-economic analysis of a bio-jet-fuel intermediate production process with various integration strategies

被引:11
|
作者
Yu, Bor-Yih [1 ,2 ]
Tsai, Chang-Che [3 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Chem & Mat Engn, 259 Wenhua 1st Rd, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, 5 Fuxing St, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Chem Engn, 1,Sec 4,Roosevelt Rd, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
来源
关键词
Bio-jet fuel; Aldol condensation; Multi-effect evaporation; Furfural; PR plus COSMOSAC; Techno-economic analysis; MULTI EFFECT EVAPORATION; ORGANIC RANKINE-CYCLE; FURFURAL PRODUCTION; ALDOL-CONDENSATION; DISTILLATION PROCESS; TERNARY AZEOTROPE; VAPOR-PRESSURE; RANGE ALKANES; DESIGN; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2070.03.012
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In this paper, we firstly report on the different scenarios of the process integration to produce jet-fuel intermediates from biomass. Rigorous process simulation, optimization, techno-economical evaluation, and carbon emission calculation are performed. We start from the aldol condensation process converting furfural and acetone to the jet-fuel intermediate. COSMO-SAC model and the PR+COSMOSAC equation of state (EOS) are firstly incorporated to estimate the missing physical properties of both pure component and the mixture. In this part, three process schemes (the distillation-only process, the multi-effect evaporation (MEE) assisted process, and the solvent-less process) are investigated, and the total annual cost (TAC) are compared. Comparing with the distillation-only process, the optimization results indicate a more favorable condition in the solvent-less process (89.76% TAC reduction) than the MEE-assisted process (25.54% TAC reduction). Moreover, different strategies of integrating the aldol condensation process with the front-end furfural production process are discussed. They are presented in five scenarios. YUMC (yearly unit manufacture cost) and ER (emission ratio) are calculated to quantify the economic performance and CO2 emission. Through this work, we suggest that the Scenario 4 (YUMC = 0.716 USD/kg, ER = -1.65) would be the most suitable one for CO2 reduction in the future, and the Scenario 2 (YUMC = 0.698 USD/kg, ER = 0.28) could be the nearest solution to enhance the economic performance and reducing CO2 emission based on the current technology. (C) 2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 65
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Techno-economic analysis of the production process of structural bio-adhesive derived from glycerol
    Yang, Minliang
    Rosentrater, Kurt A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 228 : 388 - 398
  • [22] Techno-economic analysis of fry-drying and torrefaction plant for bio-solid fuel production
    Truong Xuan Do
    Lim, Young-il
    Cho, Hyodeuk
    Shim, Jaehui
    Yoo, Jeongkeun
    Rho, Kyutai
    Choi, Seong-Geun
    Park, Chanwoo
    Park, Byeong-Yun
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 119 : 45 - 53
  • [23] Large scale algal oil production for bio-fuel use: Techno-economic analysis and evaluation
    Petrides, Dimitrios
    Carmichael, Doug
    Siletti, Charles
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 255
  • [24] Process simulation and techno-economic analysis for production of industrial sugars from lignocellulosic biomass
    Kuo, Po-Chih
    Yu, Jian
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2020, 155
  • [25] Scale-up of the erythritol production technology - Process simulation and techno-economic analysis
    Rakicka-Pustulka, Magdalena
    Mironczuk, Aleksandra M.
    Celinska, Ewelina
    Bialas, Wojciech
    Rymowicz, Waldemar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 257
  • [26] Hydrocarbon bio-jet fuel from bioconversion of poplar biomass: techno-economic assessment
    Crawford, Jordan T.
    Shan, Chin Wei
    Budsberg, Erik
    Morgan, Hannah
    Bura, Renata
    Gustafson, Rick
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2016, 9
  • [27] Hydrocarbon bio-jet fuel from bioconversion of poplar biomass: techno-economic assessment
    Jordan T. Crawford
    Chin Wei Shan
    Erik Budsberg
    Hannah Morgan
    Renata Bura
    Rick Gustafson
    [J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 9
  • [28] Techno-economic analysis of pennycress production, harvest and post-harvest logistics for renewable jet fuel
    Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem
    Shah, Ajay
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 123
  • [29] Process and techno-economic analysis of bio-jet fuel-range hydrocarbon production from lignocellulosic biomass via aqueous phase deconstruction and catalytic conversion
    Li, Yuping
    Chen, Lungang
    Zhang, Xinghua
    Zhang, Qi
    Wang, Tiejun
    Qiu, Songbai
    Tan, Jin
    Li, Kai
    Ma, Longlong
    [J]. 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY (ICAE2016), 2017, 105 : 675 - 680
  • [30] A novel moving bed chemical looping process with integration of combustor heat exchangers for hydrogen production: Process simulation and techno-economic analysis
    Zhang, Qiaochu
    Joshi, Rushikesh K.
    Xu, Dikai
    Tong, Andrew
    Fan, Liang-Shih
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 49 : 823 - 839