EVALUATION OF CZECH NON-CHEMICAL VOCATIONAL SCHOOL CHEMISTRY TEXTBOOKS' TEXT DIFFICULTY

被引:1
|
作者
Rusek, Martin [1 ]
Vosykova, Lucie [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Educ, Dept Chem & Chem Educ, Magdaleny Rettigove 4, Prague 11639 1, Czech Republic
关键词
textbook analysis; text-difficulty; vocational school chemistry; chemistry education; SECONDARY; SCIENCE; TEACHERS; REPRESENTATIONS; VOCABULARY; QUESTIONS; MODELS; LOAD; LAW;
D O I
10.2478/cdem-2021-0008
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The paper follows the first author's continuous work on chemistry textbook analysis. In the previous paper published in CERP, attention was given to the procedure and results for analysing text-difficulty in lower-secondary chemistry textbooks in Czechia. In this paper, attention was given to non-chemical vocational school chemistry textbooks. They are intended for the most numerous group of upper-secondary students. The goal of the study was to assess the to what extent could students read the textbook texts on their own with appropriate understanding. Therefore, only the textual component was evaluated. The same method (Nestler-Prucha-Pluskal) as in the previous paper was used to analyse the textbooks' text-difficulty (readability). The results show there are two books which are suitable for students' own learning. However, there are four textbooks which contain text of high difficulty, including too many scientific terms that they are suitable as teacher's guide through terms rather than student's textbooks. The analysis may serve teachers with their textbook choice as well as researchers who operate in the same field who can easily adopt the methodology and compare results.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 108
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Elementary School Chemistry Textbooks. Text-difficulty Evaluation
    Rusek, Martin
    Starkova, Dagmar
    Metelkova, Iva
    Benes, Pavel
    [J]. CHEMICKE LISTY, 2016, 110 (12): : 953 - 958
  • [2] The Text Difficulty in some Czech Natural Science Textbooks
    Hrabi, Libuse
    [J]. NEW EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 2010, 22 (3-4): : 143 - 148
  • [3] Analysis of text difficulty in lower-secondary chemistry textbooks
    Rusek, Martin
    Vojir, Karel
    [J]. CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 20 (01) : 85 - 94
  • [4] INTEGRATED APPROACH TO LEARNING PROCESS OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY OF STUDENTS OF NON-CHEMICAL QUALIFICATION IN HIGH SCHOOL
    Lisun, N. M.
    Sutyagin, A. A.
    [J]. IZVESTIYA VYSSHIKH UCHEBNYKH ZAVEDENII KHIMIYA I KHIMICHESKAYA TEKHNOLOGIYA, 2012, 55 (09): : 119 - +
  • [5] GENERAL CHEMISTRY IN THIRD YEAR FOR NON-CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
    COLLINS, F
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1971, (NSEP): : 47 - &
  • [6] CHEMISTRY EDUCATION AT UNIVERSITIES FOR NON-CHEMICAL STUDY PROGRAMMES
    Jaklova Dytrtova, Jana
    Dytrtova, Radmila
    Jakl, Michal
    Navratil, Tomas
    Petr, Miroslav
    Steffl, Michal
    [J]. CHEMICKE LISTY, 2014, 108 (12): : 1172 - 1178
  • [7] Representations of chemical phenomena in secondary school chemistry textbooks
    Upahi, Johnson Enero
    Ramnarain, Umesh
    [J]. CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 20 (01) : 146 - 159
  • [8] Evaluation of chemical representations in physical chemistry textbooks
    Nyachwaya, James M.
    Wood, Nathan B.
    [J]. CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2014, 15 (04) : 720 - 728
  • [9] Evaluation of a Non-Chemical Compared to a Non-Chemical Plus Silica Gel Approach to Bed Bug Management
    Abbar, Salehe
    Wang, Changlu
    Cooper, Richard
    [J]. INSECTS, 2020, 11 (07) : 1 - 11
  • [10] EXAMINATION OF CHEMICAL REPRESENTATIONS IN TURKISH HIGH SCHOOL CHEMISTRY TEXTBOOKS
    Demirdogen, Betul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2017, 16 (04): : 472 - 499