Standard-based science education and critical thinking

被引:50
|
作者
Forawi, Sufian A. [1 ]
机构
[1] British Univ, Coll Educ, Dubai 345015, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Critical thinking; Pre-service teachers; Standard-based education; Science education; DISPOSITIONS; INQUIRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsc.2016.02.005
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigated pre-service teachers' perceptions and utilization of critical thinking in standard-based science education. A convenience sample of 120 pre-service teachers participated in the study by examining the United States' National K-12 Science Education Standards, using the Critical Thinking Attribute Survey (CTAS) originally developed and validated by the authors to measure critical thinking attributes. The main results of the study identified the science standards that exhibit critical thinking from the pre-service teachers' perspectives. The process-oriented standards, i.e., the inquiry, nature of science, technology, personal and societal perspectives had higher means than the content standards, of life, physical and Earth sciences. Several specific standard objectives are presented from top and bottom attribution to critical thinking. For example, standard benchmarks that are rated the highest included: think critically and logically to establish relationships between evidence and explanations; design and conduct scientific experiments; and acquire the abilities necessary to do inquiry investigations. Examples of the least standard benchmarks included: structure and function in living systems, transfer of energy, and properties and changes of matter. Discussion is provided to connect results with the current literature review and models of critical thinking, along with recommendations and implications to teacher education and K-12 science education practice and research. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 62
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fostering critical thinking in science education: Exploring effective pedagogical models
    Sujatmika, Sigit
    Masykuri, Mohammad
    Prayitno, Baskoro Adi
    Sutarno, Sutarno
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 11 (07): : 149 - 159
  • [32] Scientific Thinking and Critical Thinking in Science Education: Two Distinct but Symbiotically Related Intellectual Processes
    Garcia-Carmona, Antonio
    [J]. SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2023,
  • [33] E-Learning Personalization Using Triple-Factor Approach in Standard-Based Education
    Laksitowening, K. A.
    Santoso, H. B.
    Hasibuan, Z. A.
    [J]. 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING AND APPLIED INFORMATICS 2016 : APPLIED INFORMATICS TOWARD SMART ENVIRONMENT, PEOPLE, AND SOCIETY, 2017, 801
  • [34] School accountability and standard-based education reform: The recall of social efficiency movement and scientific management
    Kim, Jonghun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 60 : 80 - 87
  • [35] Science, method and critical thinking
    Danchin, Antoine
    [J]. MICROBIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 16 (10): : 1888 - 1894
  • [36] Critical thinking and integration of history-and-philosophy-of-science content in college-science education
    Raman, Anantanarayanan
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2024, 126 (05): : 519 - 520
  • [37] Standard-based interoperability is key for terminal automation systems
    Miller, Paul
    [J]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2011, 90 (08): : 13 - 13
  • [38] Critical thinking and nursing science
    Malinski, VM
    [J]. NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2001, 14 (01) : 14 - 14
  • [39] Nursing student the critical thinking development of the critical thinking education
    Yildirim, Belgin
    Ozsoy, Suheyla Altug
    [J]. HEALTHMED, 2011, 5 (04): : 846 - 856
  • [40] A Gold Standard-Based Approach for Arabic Ontology Evaluation
    Mezghanni, Imen Bouaziz
    Gargouri, Faiez
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (ECKM 2017), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2017, : 1153 - 1161