Standard-based science education and critical thinking

被引:50
|
作者
Forawi, Sufian A. [1 ]
机构
[1] British Univ, Coll Educ, Dubai 345015, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Critical thinking; Pre-service teachers; Standard-based education; Science education; DISPOSITIONS; INQUIRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsc.2016.02.005
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigated pre-service teachers' perceptions and utilization of critical thinking in standard-based science education. A convenience sample of 120 pre-service teachers participated in the study by examining the United States' National K-12 Science Education Standards, using the Critical Thinking Attribute Survey (CTAS) originally developed and validated by the authors to measure critical thinking attributes. The main results of the study identified the science standards that exhibit critical thinking from the pre-service teachers' perspectives. The process-oriented standards, i.e., the inquiry, nature of science, technology, personal and societal perspectives had higher means than the content standards, of life, physical and Earth sciences. Several specific standard objectives are presented from top and bottom attribution to critical thinking. For example, standard benchmarks that are rated the highest included: think critically and logically to establish relationships between evidence and explanations; design and conduct scientific experiments; and acquire the abilities necessary to do inquiry investigations. Examples of the least standard benchmarks included: structure and function in living systems, transfer of energy, and properties and changes of matter. Discussion is provided to connect results with the current literature review and models of critical thinking, along with recommendations and implications to teacher education and K-12 science education practice and research. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 62
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Standard-based elearning solutions in higher education
    Computer and Automation Research Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Elearning Department, Kende u. 13-17, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
    [J]. Period Polytech Electr Eng, 2006, 3-4 (175-183):
  • [2] Critical thinking and science education
    Bailin S.
    [J]. Science & Education, 2002, 11 (4) : 361 - 375
  • [3] Philosophy of Science, Critical Thinking and Science Education
    Peter Davson-Galle
    [J]. Science & Education, 2004, 13 (6) : 503 - 517
  • [4] Critical Thinking Environments for Science Education
    Woolf, Beverly Park
    Murray, Tom
    Marshall, David
    Dragon, Toby
    Kohler, Kevin
    Mattingly, Matt
    Bruno, Merle
    Murray, Dan
    Sammons, Jim
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: SUPPORTING LEARNING THROUGH INTELLIGENT AND SOCIALLY INFORMED TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 125 : 702 - 709
  • [5] CRITICAL THINKING AND SCIENCE-EDUCATION
    BYRNE, MS
    JOHNSTONE, AH
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1987, 12 (03) : 325 - 339
  • [6] THE RATIONALITY OF SCIENCE, CRITICAL THINKING, AND SCIENCE-EDUCATION
    SIEGEL, H
    [J]. SYNTHESE, 1989, 80 (01) : 9 - 41
  • [7] A case for critical constructivism and critical thinking in science education
    Watts M.
    Jofili Z.
    Bezerra R.
    [J]. Research in Science Education, 1997, 27 (2) : 309 - 322
  • [8] Personalized E-Learning Architecture In Standard-Based Education
    Laksitowening, Kusuma Ayu
    Hasibuan, Zainal A.
    [J]. 2015 International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech), 2015, : 110 - 114
  • [9] Standard-Based Teaching Quality Assessment
    Zhang, Shuang
    Hu, Qinghe
    [J]. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Education, E-learning and Management Technology, 2016, 44 : 152 - 155
  • [10] Building standard-based survey software
    Cameron, M
    Weisberg, J
    [J]. ASC 2003: THE IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY ON THE SURVEY PROCESS, 2003, : 217 - 224