Comparison of efficacy of positron emission tomography/computed tomography with contrast-enhanced computed tomography in pretreatment evaluation of head and neck cancers: An institutional experience

被引:0
|
作者
Jain, Mayuri [1 ]
Sarin, Arti [1 ]
Suhag, V. [1 ]
Gahlot, G. P. S. [2 ]
Jain, Anurag [3 ]
Bandhopadhya, A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Army Hosp RnR, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Delhi, India
[2] Army Hosp RnR, Dept Pathol, New Delhi, India
[3] Army Hosp RnR, Dept Nucl Med, New Delhi, India
[4] Army Hosp RnR, Dept Surg Oncol, New Delhi, India
关键词
Computed tomography scan; fine-needle aspiration cytology; Head and Neck Cancers; positron emission tomography scan; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; IMPACT; PET;
D O I
10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_226_17
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) constitute 5.4% of all cancers worldwide, and 23% of all cancers in males and 6% of all cancers in females diagnosed in India. Lots of ambiguity exists in primary, nodal, and metastatic workup of these patients, especially in developing countries. Aim: The study was designed to compare the accuracy of whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (WBPET/CT) scan with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) face and neck as pretreatment evaluation for staging workup and management decision and to confirm the nodal findings on imaging with fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Design: It was a single-institute, prospective, observational, interventional study over a 2-year period. All cases of SCC of upper aerodigestive tract who were scheduled for definitive treatment concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy were evaluated with routine investigations followed by imaging in the form of CECT face and neck and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) WBPET/CT. Results: In the 40 enrolled patients, all underwent CECT face and neck and WBPET/CT. During initial workup, biopsy was taken from primary site and FNAC was done from neck nodes for diagnosis and for staging. In 40 patients, CECT neck showed nodal metastasis in 39 patients; however, FNAC came positive in 38 cases. PET/CT showed nodal metastasis in 38 patients; however, FNAC came positive in 38 cases. Any node with Standardized uptake value (SUV) >2.5 was taken as suspicious lesion and FNAC was done. Sensitivity of CECT and PET/CT was 97.36% and 100%, respectively, while the specificity was 0% and 100%, respectively. Positive predictive value calculated for CECT and WBPET was 94.87% and 100%, respectively, while the negative predictive value for CECT and WBPET was 0% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: In head and neck SCC, FDG-PET/CT is more accurate than CECT in staging of the neck.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 221
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography performs better than contrast-enhanced computed tomography for metastasis evaluation in the initial staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Sampath Santhosh
    Bhagwant Rai Mittal
    Deepak Kumar Bhasin
    Surinder Singh Rana
    Rajesh Gupta
    Ashim Das
    Ritambhra Nada
    [J]. Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2017, 31 : 575 - 581
  • [22] Comparison of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and whole-body positron emission tomography for initial staging of Hodgkin disease
    Blum, MR
    Jeffrey, RB
    Krausz, Y
    Segall, GM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 421 - 421
  • [23] Assessment of Combination of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Ovarian Masses
    Tsuboyama, Takahiro
    Tatsumi, Mitsuaki
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Nakamoto, Atsushi
    Kim, Tonsok
    Hori, Masatoshi
    Sakane, Makoto
    Hori, Yumiko
    Morii, Eiichi
    Hatazawa, Jun
    Tomiyama, Noriyuki
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (08) : 524 - 531
  • [24] Contrast-enhanced [18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in clinical oncology: tumor-, site-, and question-based comparison with standard positron emission tomography/computed tomography
    Morbelli, Silvia
    Conzi, Raffaella
    Campus, Claudio
    Cittadini, Giuseppe
    Bossert, Irene
    Massollo, Michela
    Fornarini, Giuseppe
    Calamia, Iolanda
    Marini, Cecilia
    Fiz, Francesco
    Ghersi, Chiara
    Derchi, Lorenzo E.
    Sambuceti, Gianmario
    [J]. CANCER IMAGING, 2014, 14
  • [25] Contrast-enhanced [18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in clinical oncology: tumor-, site-, and question-based comparison with standard positron emission tomography/computed tomography
    Silvia Morbelli
    Raffaella Conzi
    Claudio Campus
    Giuseppe Cittadini
    Irene Bossert
    Michela Massollo
    Giuseppe Fornarini
    Iolanda Calamia
    Cecilia Marini
    Francesco Fiz
    Chiara Ghersi
    Lorenzo E Derchi
    Gianmario Sambuceti
    [J]. Cancer Imaging, 14
  • [26] Comparison of Preoperative Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography with Panscopy and Ultrasound in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
    Salehi, Amir M.
    Norberg-Spaak, Lena
    Vallin, Simon
    Sgaramella, Nicola
    Nylander, Karin
    [J]. ONCOLOGY, 2020, 98 (12) : 889 - 892
  • [27] Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in Head and Neck Cancer
    Escott, Edward J.
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 51 (05) : 881 - +
  • [28] Positron emission tomography/computed tomography evaluation for choriocarcinoma
    Yamamoto, Yorito
    Maeda, Nagamasa
    Fukaya, Takao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2009, 104 (02) : 149 - 150
  • [29] Positron-emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in head and neck oncology:An update
    Viet D Nguyen
    Bundhit Tantiwongkosi
    Wyatt J Weinheimer
    Frank R Miller
    [J]. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 2016, 6 (02) : 23 - 32
  • [30] Comparison of Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography for the Evaluation Bone Invasion in Upper and Lower Gingival Cancers
    Lee, Young Chan
    Jung, Ah Ra
    Kwon, Oh Eun
    Kim, Eui-Jong
    Hong, Il Ki
    Lee, Jung-Woo
    Eun, Young-Gyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (04) : 875.e1 - 875.e9