Caught between the users and the firm: How does identity conflict affect employees' innovative behavior

被引:15
|
作者
Schweisfurth, Tim G. [1 ]
Raasch, Christina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Technol Innovat & Entrepreneurship, Sonderborg, Denmark
[2] Kuhne Logist Univ, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
boundary spanner; identification; innovation; job satisfaction; user innovation; COMMON METHOD VARIANCE; EMBEDDED LEAD USERS; SOCIAL IDENTITY; WORK BEHAVIOR; MULTIPLE IDENTITIES; ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION; PROFESSIONAL IDENTIFICATION; RELATIONAL EMBEDDEDNESS; INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION; CUSTOMER ORIENTATION;
D O I
10.1111/caim.12380
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Absorbing external knowledge is crucial for innovation within the organization. One way of tapping external knowledge sources is to rely on employees who reach out across the firm's boundary to external stakeholders and address knowledge sets located beyond the organizational boundary. However, such employees are likely to identify with the stakeholders they reach out to which exposes them to potentially conflicting demands-with positive or negative effects for their employing organization. We investigate whether and how their dual identification with the organization and with users, and the potential identity conflicts this engenders, affects their job satisfaction and innovativeness. We study a sample of 243 employees in two industries, revealing that perceived conflict between organizational identification and user identification detracts from job satisfaction if and only if employees are strongly identified with both targets. We find also that identity conflict is indirectly and negatively related to innovative work behavior through job satisfaction. Our paper contributes to the literature on the benefits and risks of employee ties to external stakeholders. We contribute also to research on embedded users by elucidating under what conditions they are most valuable to their employing organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 397
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Investigating the mechanism linking task conflict with employees' innovative work behavior
    Al-Ghazali, Basheer M.
    Afsar, Bilal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, 2021, 32 (04) : 599 - 625
  • [22] How does spiritual leadership inspire employees' innovative behavior? The role of psychological capital and intrinsic motivation
    Li, Bin
    Yu, Weinan
    Lei, Yongxin
    Hu, Mingqi
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, 2023, 73 (06):
  • [23] How Does Commitment Affect Employee's Innovative Behavior? A Time-Lagged Study
    Wang, Peng
    Hou, Yong
    SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [24] How does perceived respect affect innovative behavior? The role of thriving at work and spiritual leadership
    Zhao, Li
    Liu, Pingqing
    Zhang, Fan
    Xu, Shuang
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [25] How supportive and controlling supervision influence employees' innovative behavior
    Zhou, Yutong
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2023, 51 (10):
  • [26] How does firm prestige affect the cost of bank loans?
    Dai, Yunhao
    Kordsachia, Othar
    Tan, Weiqiang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2023, 29 (08): : 888 - 918
  • [27] How does corporate social responsibility affect firm leverage?
    Ho, Kung-Cheng
    Wang, Qian
    Sun, Xianming
    Wang, Leonard F. S.
    KYBERNETES, 2022, 51 (10) : 2902 - 2926
  • [28] Innovative Behavior and the Reciprocal Exchange between Employees and Organizations
    Pundt, Alexander
    Martins, Erko
    Nerdinger, Friedemann W.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PERSONALFORSCHUNG, 2010, 24 (02): : 173 - 193
  • [29] How does the needs-supplies fit of developmental job experience affect employees' proactive behavior?
    Chen, Qishan
    Li, Miaosi
    Fan, Honglan
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2023, 41 (3) : 1633 - 1660
  • [30] How and When Does Perceived CSR Affect Employees' Engagement in Voluntary Pro-environmental Behavior?
    Tian, Qing
    Robertson, Jennifer L.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2019, 155 (02) : 399 - 412