Deep support vector machine for hyperspectral image classification

被引:125
|
作者
Okwuashi, Onuwa [1 ]
Ndehedehe, Christopher E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Uyo, Dept Geoinformat & Surveying, PMB 1017, Uyo, Nigeria
[2] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Griffith Sch Environm & Sci, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
关键词
Remote sensing; Hyperspectral image; Deep support vector machine; Image classification; SVM; MULTICLASS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107298
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
To improve on the robustness of traditional machine learning approaches, emphasis has recently shifted to the integration of such methods with Deep Learning techniques. However, the classification problems, complexity and inconsistency in several spectral classifiers developed for hyperspectral images are some reasons warranting further research. This study investigates the application of Deep Support Vector Machine (DSVM) for hyperspectral image classification. Two hyperspectral images, Indian Pines and University of Pavia are used as tentative test beds for the experiment. The DSVM is implemented with four kernel functions: Exponential Radial Basis Function (ERBF), Gaussian Radial Basis Function (GRBF), neural and polynomial. Stand-alone Support Vector Machines form the interconnecting weights of the entire network. The network is trained with one hundred input datasets, and the interconnecting weights of the network are initialised using the regularisation parameter of the model. Numerical results show that the classification accuracies of the DSVM for Indian Pines and University of Pavia based on each DSVM kernel functions are: ERBF (98.87%, 98.16%), GRBF (98.90%, 98.47%), neural (98.41%, 97.27%), and polynomial (99.24%, 98.79%). By comparing the DSVM algorithm against well-known classifiers, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Deep Neural Network (DNN), Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), K Nearest Neighbour (KNN), and K Means (KM) classifiers, the mean classification accuracies for Indian Pines and University of Pavia are: DSVM (98.86%, 98.17%), SVM (76.03%, 73.52%), DNN (94.45%, 93.79%), GMM (76.82%, 78.35%), KNN (76.87%, 78.80%), and KM (21.65%, 18.18%). These results indicate that the DSVM outperformed the other classification algorithms. The high accuracy obtained with the DSVM validates its efficacy as state-of-the-art algorithm for hyperspectral image classification. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Image Classification via Support Vector Machine
    Sun, Xiaowu
    Liu, Lizhen
    Wang, Hanshi
    Song, Wei
    Lu, Jingli
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK TECHNOLOGY (ICCSNT 2015), 2015, : 485 - 489
  • [32] Hyperspectral image classification using support vector machine: a spectral spatial feature based approach
    Diganta Kumar Pathak
    Sanjib Kumar Kalita
    Dhruba Kumar Bhattacharya
    [J]. Evolutionary Intelligence, 2022, 15 : 1809 - 1823
  • [33] Hyperspectral image classification inspired by Kronecker decomposition-based hybrid support vector machine
    Wang, Xiaotao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 17 (02)
  • [34] Support vector machine versus convolutional neural network for hyperspectral image classification: A systematic review
    Kaul, Ajay
    Raina, Sneha
    [J]. CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2022, 34 (15):
  • [35] HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGE CLASSIFICATION BASED ON THE INTEGRATION OF SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE AND RANDOM FOREST
    Du, Peijun
    Xia, Junshi
    Chanussot, Jocelyn
    He, Xiyan
    [J]. 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2012, : 174 - 177
  • [36] Hyperspectral image classification using support vector machine: a spectral spatial feature based approach
    Pathak, Diganta Kumar
    Kalita, Sanjib Kumar
    Bhattacharya, Dhruba Kumar
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 15 (03) : 1809 - 1823
  • [37] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE IN CLASSIFICATION OF HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY
    Samadzadegan, F.
    Hasani, H.
    Partovi, T.
    [J]. 2010 CANADIAN GEOMATICS CONFERENCE AND SYMPOSIUM OF COMMISSION I, ISPRS CONVERGENCE IN GEOMATICS - SHAPING CANADA'S COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE, 2010, 38
  • [38] Classification of Hyperspectral Images Using Unsupervised Support Vector Machine
    Adibi, Sayyed Ashkan
    Hassani, Mohammad
    Karami, Azam
    [J]. IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR REMOTE SENSING XXIII, 2017, 10427
  • [39] Using Wavelet Support Vector Machine for Classification of Hyperspectral Images
    Banki, Mohammad Hossein
    Shirazi, Ali Asghar Beheshti
    [J]. 2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE VISION, PROCEEDINGS, ( ICMV 2009), 2009, : 154 - 157
  • [40] Support Vector Machine for classification of hyperspectral remote sensing imagery
    Dai, Chen-guang
    Huang, Xiao-bo
    Dong, Guang-jun
    [J]. FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, VOL 4, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 77 - 80