Conceptual design and feasibility assessment of photoreactors for solar energy storage

被引:16
|
作者
Rossetti, Ilenia [1 ,2 ]
Bahadori, Elnaz [1 ,2 ]
Tripodi, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Villa, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Prati, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Ramis, Gianguido [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, CNR, ISTM, Dip Chim,Chem Plants & Ind Chem Grp, Via C Golgi 19, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Milano Univ, INSTM Unit, Via C Golgi 19, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Genoa, Dip Ingn Civile Chim & Ambientale, Via All Opera Pia 15A, I-16100 Genoa, Italy
[4] INSTM Unit Genova, Via All Opera Pia 15A, I-16100 Genoa, Italy
关键词
Photoreactor; Hydrogen production; Photocatalytic reforming; CO2; photoreduction; PHOTOCATALYTIC HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; HIGH-PRESSURE; CO2; PHOTOCONVERSION; WATER; SYSTEMS; FUELS; PHASE; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.solener.2018.02.056
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The experimental results of testing with different irradiation power are compared and used as a basis for the feasibility assessment and conceptual design of a photoreforming reactor. The highest H-2 productivity (0.276 mol H-2/h kg(cat)) was achieved with 1 g/L of 1 wt% Au/TiO2 P25 catalyst by using a 113 W/m(2) UVA irradiation. Insufficient hydrogen productivity for practical deployment was achieved, following reactor design. However, the comparison with the state of the art evidenced that also the energy storage potential of the literature photocatalysts do not allow a short term feasibility of the proposed technology. The potential productivity of hydrogen, as well as solar energy storage efficiency are discussed both for the present experimental values and for the best results in the literature. On the other hand, solar energy can be used to artificially fix CO2, e.g. captured and stored from combustion processes that can be converted back to chemicals or regenerated fuels. The production of H-2, HCOOH, HCHO and CH3OH by photoreduction of CO2 has been evaluated as for daily production potential. CO2 photoconversion to formaldehyde can be envisaged as solar energy storage mean with 13.3% efficiency, whereas for the other products the solar energy storage efficiency was below 1%.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 231
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Feasibility Analysis of Different Energy Storage Systems for Solar Road Lighting Systems
    Yoomak, Suntiti
    Ngaopitakkul, Atthapol
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 101992 - 102001
  • [42] Feasibility Analysis of Different Energy Storage Systems for Solar Road Lighting Systems
    Yoomak, Suntiti
    Ngaopitakkul, Atthapol
    2019 IEEE/IAS 55TH INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL POWER SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONFERENCE (I&CPS), 2019, : 187 - 196
  • [43] A conceptual design of solar boiler
    Munoz, Javier
    Abanades, Alberto
    Martinez-Val, Jose M.
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2009, 83 (09) : 1713 - 1722
  • [44] Design of carbon foams for seasonal solar thermal energy storage
    Jana, P.
    del Barrio, E. Palomo
    Fierro, V.
    Medjandi, G.
    Celzard, A.
    CARBON, 2016, 109 : 771 - 787
  • [45] Design of clean energy dispatching system for wind and solar storage
    Song, Jinghui
    Su, Leitao
    INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON GREEN ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 601
  • [46] Design and experimental investigation of solar cooker with thermal energy storage
    Wollele, Muluken Biadgelegn
    Hassen, Abdulkadir Aman
    AIMS ENERGY, 2019, 7 (06) : 957 - 970
  • [47] SOLAR HEATING THERMAL STORAGE FEASIBILITY
    JOY, P
    SHELPUK, B
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1977, 99 (05) : 101 - 101
  • [48] New generation eco dryer design with solar energy assisted energy storage
    Deniz, Zafer
    Aktas, Mustafa
    Guven, Yaren
    Sensoy, Bugra
    JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2024,
  • [49] A fuzzy weighted wedge mechanism for feasibility assessment of system reliability during conceptual design
    Verma, D
    Knezevic, J
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1996, 83 (02) : 179 - 187
  • [50] Modeling Magnetohydrodynamic Energy Generation and Storage in Planetary Entry System Conceptual Design
    Ali, Hisham K.
    Braun, Robert D.
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2018, 55 (02) : 356 - 364