Teaching decision-making for sustainable infrastructure: a wind energy case study module

被引:9
|
作者
McWhirter, Nathan Daniel [1 ]
Shealy, Tripp [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Infrastructure; Transdisciplinary education; Behavioral science; Civil engineering; Envision rating system; BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS; PSYCHOLOGY; EDUCATION; CIVIL;
D O I
10.1108/IJSHE-10-2017-0183
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to introduce a case-based module teaching sustainable engineering, linking the Envision rating system with behavioral decision science. Three complete modules are publicly available in a repository for any instructor to adapt, use and review. Design/methodology/approach A case study was written about the Tucannon River Wind Farm, a project-certified Gold by the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure's Envision rating system. The case was used as the basis for an in-class PowerPoint module to achieve student learning outcomes related to sustainability. Findings Before and after surveys showed significant (p < 0.05) learning increases. Word clouds show changes in student perceptions of sustainable design. Rubric scoring of writing assignments and concept maps yielded valuable insights and improvements and demonstrated the overall validity of the module approach. Research limitations/implications Modules lasting only one or two class days must be well-integrated into courses and curricula to promote greater learning value. Concept mapping may be a useful addition but involves a learning curve for both instructors and students. Practical implications By offering instructors access to a set of case-based modules, it becomes more practical for them to teach about sustainable infrastructure and decision-making. Social implications The module exemplifies a project owner and an engineering firm strongly committed to social and environmental sustainability. Envision's Quality of Life and Leadership categories emphasize community well-being, involvement and collaboration. Originality/value This module offers a unique transdisciplinary focus meeting several needs in engineering education on sustainability, complex problems and decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / 911
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SIMULATION IN DECISION-MAKING - A CASE-STUDY
    SULE, DR
    TOLBERT, D
    GOMEZ, G
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1981, 5 (04) : 227 - 244
  • [42] Conservation decision-making in the field: a case study
    Unruh, Julie
    Harbeck, Cricket
    JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE OF CONSERVATION, 2021, 44 (01) : 3 - 24
  • [43] Portfolio decision-making genres: A case study
    Kester, Linda
    Hultink, Erik Jan
    Lauche, Kristina
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2009, 26 (04) : 327 - 341
  • [44] COLLECTIVE DECISION-MAKING IN A KIBBUTZ - CASE STUDY
    HELMAN, A
    SHECHTER, M
    PUBLIC FINANCE-FINANCES PUBLIQUES, 1973, 28 (02): : 139 - 150
  • [45] Risk analysis and decision-making - A case study
    Gamble, B.
    Project Evaluation Conference 2007, 2007, 2007 (04): : 19 - 31
  • [46] MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING - A CASE-STUDY
    KELLER, HR
    MASSART, DL
    BRANS, JP
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1991, 11 (02) : 175 - 189
  • [47] Important indicators within decision-making process in sustainable energy transition
    Deželak K.
    Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal, 2023, 21 : 30 - 34
  • [48] Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
    Wang, Jiang-Jiang
    Jing, You-Yin
    Zhang, Chun-Fa
    Zhao, Jun-Hong
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (09): : 2263 - 2278
  • [49] Energy-efficient smart home systems: Infrastructure and decision-making process
    Filho, Geraldo P. R.
    Villas, Leandro A.
    Goncalves, Vinicius P.
    Pessin, Gustavo
    Loureiro, Antonio A. F.
    Ueyama, Jo
    INTERNET OF THINGS, 2019, 5 : 153 - 167
  • [50] Supporting decision-making for sustainable nanotechnology
    Malsch I.
    Subramanian V.
    Semenzin E.
    Hristozov D.
    Marcomini A.
    Environment Systems and Decisions, 2015, 35 (1) : 54 - 75