Critical prospective appraisal of renal morphology and function in children undergoing shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy

被引:40
|
作者
Wadhwa, Pankaj
Aron, Monish
Bal, Chandra Sekhar
Dhanpatty, B.
Gupta, Narmada P. [1 ]
机构
[1] India Inst Med Sci, Dept Urol, New Delhi 110029, India
[2] India Inst Med Sci, Dept Nucl Med, New Delhi, India
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2006.9928
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the effect of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on renal morphology and function in children undergoing therapy for upper-tract urolithiasis. Patients and Methods: Fourteen patients less than 13 years of age with renal or upper-ureteral calculi who were found suitable for primary SWL or PCNL were evaluated for alteration of renal morphology and function after treatment. Of the 18 renal units treated, SWL and PCNL were performed in 9 units each. The average stone size was 880.2 mm(2) (range 110-3800 mm(2); median 660 mm(2)). All children underwent ultrasonic estimation of renal length and parenchymal thickness, (99m)technetium dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) and Tc-99m-ethylene dicystine (EDC) scintigraphy, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation prior to intervention and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. Results: Extracorporeal lithotripsy achieved complete clearance in 8 renal units (88%), requiring an average of 6333 shockwaves and an average of 2.2 sessions per renal unit. The efficiency quotient was 42. Percutaneous surgery likewise achieved complete stone clearance in 88% of renal units, with three units requiring more than one tract. Mixed calcium oxalate monohydrate and dihydrate accounted for the majority of the stones. The mean preintervention GFR was 78.3 +/- 14.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (median 82.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2); range 54-98.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), whereas the mean GFR at 3 months was 78.95 +/- 14.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (median 78.95 mL/min/1.73 m(2); range 52-98 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). A marginal improvement of an average of 0.65 mL/min was noted. Split function EDC scans demonstrated improved drainage in five cases after intervention; the rest were unchanged. Preintervention DMSA scans revealed renal cortical scars in three children. None of the renal units had developed fresh scars at follow-up scans. None of the children developed new-onset hypertension, proteinuria, or alteration in renal size. Conclusion: In the present study, pediatric SWL and PCNL were not found to cause adverse renal morphologic or functional alteration. Stone clearance resulted in marginally improved function and better drainage.
引用
收藏
页码:961 / 966
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combined ureterorenoscopy and shockwave lithotripsy for large renal stone burden: An alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
    Hafron, J
    Fogarty, JD
    Boczko, J
    Hoenig, DM
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) : 464 - 468
  • [2] COMPARISON OF TREATMENT OF RENAL CALCULI BY OPEN SURGERY, PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY, AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    CHARIG, CR
    WEBB, DR
    PAYNE, SR
    WICKHAM, JEA
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 292 (6524): : 879 - 882
  • [3] Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis?
    Cass, AS
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1996, 10 (01) : 17 - 20
  • [4] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones following failed extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: different performances and morbidities
    Zhong, Wen
    Gong, Ting
    Wang, Liang
    Zeng, Guohua
    Wu, Wenqi
    Zhao, Zhigang
    Zhong, Weide
    Wan, Shaw P.
    UROLITHIASIS, 2013, 41 (02) : 165 - 168
  • [5] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones following failed extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: different performances and morbidities
    Wen Zhong
    Ting Gong
    Liang Wang
    Guohua Zeng
    Wenqi Wu
    Zhigang Zhao
    Weide Zhong
    Shaw P. Wan
    Urolithiasis, 2013, 41 : 165 - 168
  • [6] Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for high-density, renal stones: a prospective, randomised trial
    Ahmed, Abul-fotouh
    Abdelazim, Hassan
    ElMesery, Mahmoud
    El-feky, Mohammed
    Gomaa, Aly
    Tagreda, Ibrahim
    Abozied, Hesham
    Fahim, Ahmed
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 128 (06) : 744 - 751
  • [7] SYMPTOMATIC STONE RECURRENCE FOLLOWING URETEROSCOPY, PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY, AND SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    Hubanks, John
    Rangel, Laureano
    Krambeck, Amy
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E620 - E621
  • [8] Effect of Previous Open Renal Surgery and Failed Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy on the Performance and Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
    Resorlu, Berkan
    Kara, Cengiz
    Senocak, Cagri
    Cicekbilek, Izzet
    Unsal, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (01) : 13 - 16
  • [9] LITHOTRIPSY VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY FOR RENAL CALCULI
    MILNER, PC
    NICHOLL, JP
    THOMAS, KJ
    BIRCH, S
    WESTLAKE, L
    RICHARDSON, J
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 297 (6649): : 685 - 685
  • [10] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Its Effect on Filtration Function of Kidney: a Critical Appraisal
    Anand, Ajay
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 86 (05) : 872 - 876