A New Educational Thermodynamic Software to Promote Critical Thinking in Youth Engineering Students

被引:1
|
作者
Di Biasi, Miguel Romero [1 ]
Eliecer Valencia, Guillermo [1 ]
Guillermo Obregon, Luis [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Atlantico, Dept Ingn Mecan, Carrera 30 Numero 8-49, Puerto Colombia 080007, Colombia
[2] Univ Atlantico, Dept Ingn Quim, Carrera 30 Numero 8-49, Puerto Colombia 080007, Colombia
关键词
educational software; critical thinking; graphical user interface; entropy analysis; youth engineering students;
D O I
10.3390/su12010110
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article presents the application of a new educational thermodynamic software called MOLECULARDISORDER, based on graphical user interfaces created in Matlab((R)) to promote critical thinking in youth engineering students, by means of the energy and entropy balance application in different systems. Statistics of the results obtained by the youth students are shown to determine the influence of the software in a regular course in thermodynamics to promote critical thinking. Two case studies were done by the students, where parameters such as temperature of the fluid and metal surfaces, pressure of the system, mass of the fluid and solid, volume, and velocity of the fluid are used to obtain output variables such as enthalpy, entropy, changes in entropy, entropy production, and energy transfer in the chosen system. Four cognitive skills were considered to evaluate the cognitive competencies of interpreting, arguing and proposing, and interacting with the different graphical user interfaces; these cognitive skills (CS) were argumentative claim (CS1), modeling (CS2), interpreting data/information (CS3), and organization (CS4). Student ' s T-test was used to compare the degree of difficulty of each criterion. The case studies were evaluated first without using the software and then with the use of the software to determine the significant effect of the software quantitatively. A population of 130 youth students was taken to perform the statistical analysis with a level of significance of 5%. With the help of the software, the students obtained an improvement when performing case study 1 since the p-value obtained was 0.03, indicating that there are significant differences between the results before and after taking the software. The overall averages of the grades for case study 1 had an increase after using the software from 3.74 to 4.04. The overall averages for case study 2 were also higher after taking the software from 3.44 to 3.75.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A SOFTWARE FOR DEVELOPING QUANTITATIVE CRITICAL THINKING BY CHEMICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS
    Lim, E. W. C.
    [J]. 13TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2019), 2019, : 9894 - 9894
  • [2] An Analysis of Engineering Students' Critical Thinking
    Mohamad, Mimi Mohaffyza
    Mukhtar, Marina Ibrahim
    Jamali, Ali Raza
    Kiong, Tee Tze
    Heong, Yee Mei
    Razzaq, Abdul Rasid Abdul
    [J]. 2017 7TH WORLD ENGINEERING EDUCATION FORUM (WEEF), 2017, : 593 - 596
  • [3] Strengthening critical thinking in engineering students
    Caratozzolo, Patricia
    Alvarez-Delgado, Alvaro
    Hosseini, Samira
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING - IJIDEM, 2019, 13 (03): : 995 - 1012
  • [4] Strengthening critical thinking in engineering students
    Patricia Caratozzolo
    Alvaro Alvarez-Delgado
    Samira Hosseini
    [J]. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 2019, 13 : 995 - 1012
  • [5] Educational Software for the Calculation of Thermodynamic Values of Real Gases for the Training of Engineering Students in Romania
    Neacsu, Sorin
    Suditu, Silvian
    Popescu, Catalin
    [J]. SELECTED TOPICS IN EDUCATION AND EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2010, : 171 - +
  • [6] Questioning Techniques Promote the Critical Thinking in Engineering Education
    Luksanasakul, Arkhom
    Chanthong, Apirun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON2017), 2017, : 1054 - 1057
  • [7] HOW TO PROMOTE THE CRITICAL THINKING OF STUDENTS IN DISTANCE LEARNING?
    Le Poder, Laurence
    Gontier, Olga
    [J]. EDULEARN18: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, : 3568 - 3576
  • [8] On Science and Engineering Students Thinking Features and Educational Countermeasures
    Zhang, Xiao
    Lin, Chao-Ying
    [J]. ICEEM 2012: 2012 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC, EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 2, 2012, : 295 - 298
  • [9] Use of Argument Maps to Promote Critical Thinking in Engineering Education
    Rocke, Sean
    Radix, Cathy-Ann
    Persad, Jeevan
    Ringis, Daniel
    [J]. 2014 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2014, : 588 - 591
  • [10] Software Support for Team Engineering: Educational Case for IT Students
    Zvereva, Olga M.
    Shams, S. M. Riad
    [J]. 2018 IV INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION (INFORINO), 2018,