Risk of Scoliosis Progression in Nonoperatively Treated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Based on Skeletal Maturity

被引:9
|
作者
Johnson, Mitchell A. [1 ]
Flynn, John M. [1 ]
Anari, Jason B. [1 ]
Gohel, Shivani [1 ]
Cahill, Patrick J. [1 ]
Winell, Jennifer J. [1 ]
Baldwin, Keith D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; progression; surgery; skeletal maturity; risk; outcomes; CURVE PROGRESSION; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; SCANNING METHOD; BRACE; PREDICTION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1097/BPO.0000000000001929
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Hand radiographs for skeletal maturity staging are now frequently used to evaluate remaining growth potential for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Our objective was to create a model predicting a patient's risk of curve progression based on modern treatment standards. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all AIS patients presenting with a major curve <50 degrees, available hand radiographs, and complete follow up through skeletal maturity at our institution over a 3-year period. Patients with growth remaining underwent rigid bracing of curves >25 degrees, whereas patients between 10 and 25 degrees were observed. Treatment success was defined as reaching skeletal maturity with a major curve Results: Of 609 AIS patients (75.4% female) presenting with curves over 10 degrees and reaching skeletal maturity at most recent follow up, 503 (82.6%) had major thoracic curves. 16.3% (82/503) of thoracic curves progressed into surgical treatment range. The highest risk group (Sanders 1 to 6 and curve 40 to 49 degrees, Sanders 1 to 2 and curve 30 to 39) demonstrate a 30% success rate with nonoperative treatment. This constitutes an 111.1 times (95% confidence interval: 47.6 to 250.0, P<0.001) higher risk of progression to surgical range than patients in the lowest risk categories (Sanders 1 to 8 and curve 10 to 19 degrees, Sanders 3 to 8 and curve 20 to 29 degrees, Sanders 5 to 8 and curve 30 to 39 degrees). Conclusions: Skeletal maturity and curve magnitude have strong predictive value for future curve progression. The results presented here represent a valuable resource for orthopaedic providers regarding a patient's risk of progression and ultimate surgical risk.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 548
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving prediction of progression of idiopathic scoliosis based on curve size and skeletal maturity
    Neal, Kevin M.
    Boeyer, Melanie
    Craver, Emily C.
    Crook, Julia E.
    Kiebzak, Gary M.
    [J]. SPINE DEFORMITY, 2024,
  • [2] JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS FOLLOWED TO SKELETAL MATURITY
    MANNHERZ, RE
    BETZ, RR
    CLANCY, M
    STEEL, HH
    [J]. SPINE, 1988, 13 (10) : 1087 - 1090
  • [3] Curve Progression in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Does Not Match Skeletal Growth
    Cheung, Jason Pui Yin
    Cheung, Prudence Wing Hang
    Samartzis, Dino
    Luk, Keith Dip-Kei
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 476 (02) : 429 - 436
  • [4] Post-Maturity Progression in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curves of 40° to 50°
    Yu, Sze-Hon
    Ng, Cheuk-Man
    Cheung, Jason Pui-Yin
    Shea, Graham Ka-Hon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2023, 105 (04): : 277 - 285
  • [5] Curve Progression in Idiopathic Scoliosis Follow-up Study to Skeletal Maturity
    Tan, Ken-Jin
    Moe, Maung Maung
    Vaithinathan, Rose
    Wong, Hee-Kit
    [J]. SPINE, 2009, 34 (07) : 697 - 700
  • [6] Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST): Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model in Untreated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using the Simplified Skeletal Maturity System
    Lori A. Dolan
    Stuart L. Weinstein
    Mark F. Abel
    Patrick P. Bosch
    Matthew B. Dobbs
    Tyler O. Farber
    Matthew F. Halsey
    M. Timothy Hresko
    Walter F. Krengel
    Charles T. Mehlman
    James O. Sanders
    Richard M. Schwend
    Suken A. Shah
    Kushagra Verma
    [J]. Spine Deformity, 2019, 7 : 890 - 898
  • [7] Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST): Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model in Untreated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using the Simplified Skeletal Maturity System
    Dolan, Lori A.
    Weinstein, Stuart L.
    Abel, Mark F.
    Bosch, Patrick P.
    Dobbs, Matthew B.
    Farber, Tyler O.
    Halsey, Matthew F.
    Hresko, M. Timothy
    Krengel, Walter F.
    Mehlman, Charles T.
    Sanders, James O.
    Schwend, Richard M.
    Shah, Suken A.
    Verma, Kushagra
    [J]. SPINE DEFORMITY, 2019, 7 (06) : 890 - +
  • [8] Abnormal Skeletal Growth Patterns in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis - A Longitudinal Study Till Skeletal Maturity
    Yim, A. P. Y.
    Yeung, H. Y.
    Wang, W. J.
    Hung, V. W. Y.
    Qin, L.
    Lee, K. M.
    Lam, T. P.
    Qiu, Y.
    Cheng, J. C. Y.
    [J]. RESEARCH INTO SPINAL DEFORMITIES 8, 2012, 176 : 474 - 474
  • [9] A three-dimensional analysis of scoliosis progression in non-idiopathic scoliosis: is it similar to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
    Bachmann, Keith R.
    Yaszay, Burt
    Bartley, Carrie E.
    Bastrom, Tracey P.
    Reighard, Fredrick G.
    Upasani, Vidyadhar V.
    Newton, Peter O.
    Buckland, Aaron
    Samdani, Amer
    Jain, Amit
    Lonner, Baron
    Roye, Benjamin
    Reilly, Chris
    Hedequist, Daniel
    Sucato, Daniel
    Clements, David
    Miyanji, Firoz
    Shufflebarger, Harry
    Flynn, Jack
    Asghar, Jahangir
    Mac Thiong, Jean Marc
    Pahys, Joshua
    Harms, Juergen
    Bachmann, Keith
    Lenke, Larry
    Abel, Mark
    Glotzbecker, Michael
    Kelly, Michael
    Vitale, Michael
    Marks, Michelle
    Gupta, Munish
    Fletcher, Nicholas
    Cahill, Patrick
    Sponseller, Paul
    Gabos, Peter
    Newton, Peter
    Sturm, Peter
    Betz, Randal
    Lehman, Ron
    Parent, Stefan
    George, Stephen
    Hwang, Steven
    Shah, Suken
    Errico, Tom
    Upasani, Vidyadhar
    [J]. CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2019, 35 (09) : 1585 - 1590
  • [10] A three-dimensional analysis of scoliosis progression in non-idiopathic scoliosis: is it similar to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
    Keith R. Bachmann
    Burt Yaszay
    Carrie E. Bartley
    Tracey P. Bastrom
    Fredrick G. Reighard
    Vidyadhar V. Upasani
    Peter O. Newton
    [J]. Child's Nervous System, 2019, 35 : 1585 - 1590