Ecosystem service supply-demand and socioecological drivers at different spatial scales in Zhejiang Province, China

被引:47
|
作者
Wang, Liang-Jie [1 ,2 ]
Gong, Jian-Wen [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Shuai [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Shuang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xiaomian [3 ]
Jiang, Jiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coinnovat Ctr Sustainable Forestry Southern China, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Soil Eros & Ecol Restorat, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Acad Forestry, Hangzhou 310023, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Supply; -demand; Forest ecosystem; Spatial mismatch; Influencing factors; Multiscale; Zhejiang Province; PEARL RIVER DELTA; LAND-USE CHANGES; TRADE-OFFS; SYNERGIES; URBANIZATION; PROVISION; BUNDLES; DEFORESTATION; PATTERNS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109058
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Understanding the scale effects of ecosystem service (ES) supply-demand balances and drivers is critical to hierarchical ecosystem management. However, it remains unclear how the relationships of ES supply-demand and driving factors change with the scale. In this study, we first quantified food production (FP), water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), carbon storage (CS), and habitat quality (HQ) at pixel and county scales in 2000 and 2020 in Zhejiang Province. Then, we analyzed the ES supply-demand balances and trade-offs/synergies at different scales. Finally, we performed correlation analysis and applied a random forest model to explore the socioecological drivers of these ESs. Our work showed that the supplies of FP, WY, and SC increased, while those of CS and HQ decreased from 2000 to 2020. ESs at the pixel scale were more spatially heterogeneous than those at the county scale. FP and CS were in short supply, and the gaps between their supply and demand grew over time. Some ES supply-demand mismatches at the pixel scale disappeared at the county scale. From the pixel scale to the county scale, the correlation directions of the ES trade-offs/synergies changed slightly, but their intensities changed significantly. The temperature, altitude, percentage of forestland and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) had positive effects on HQ, CS and SC, while the population density (POP), gross domestic product and percentage of artificial land (PA) had negative effects. The degree of influence of most socioecological drivers on the ESs increased with increasing scale. NDVI was the most important factor for CS, while precipitation was the most important for WY. The importance of POP and PA increased with both time and scale. Ultimately, overall ES supply-demand balances should be considered at the county scale, while more accurate management measures should be implemented at the pixel scale to promote effective hierarchical ES management. This study emphasizes the necessity of considering the scale effects for ES supply-demand balances in sustainable ecosystem management.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A study on the relationship between supply-demand relationship of ecosystem services and impact factors in Gansu Province
    甘肃省生态服务供需关系及影响因子研究
    Wang, Jian (wjian@lzb.ac.cn), 1600, Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences (41): : 4926 - 4941
  • [42] Ecosystem service supply and demand relationship and spatial identification of driving threshold in Loess Plateau of China
    Qiu, Haihong
    Bai, Yingchen
    Han, Hairong
    Zhang, Jiaying
    Cheng, Xiaoqin
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 212
  • [43] Mechanism analysis of ecosystem services (ES) changes under the proposed supply-demand framework: A case study of Jiangsu Province, China
    Li, Xin
    Deng, Shiqi
    Ma, Xiaodong
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 144
  • [44] Evaluating the supply-demand balance of cultural ecosystem services with budget expectation in Shenzhen, China
    Wu, Jiansheng
    Jin, Xueru
    Wang, Han
    Feng, Zhe
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 142
  • [45] Integrating ecosystem services supply and demand into optimized management at different scales: A case study in Hulunbuir, China
    Cui, Fengqi
    Tang, Haiping
    Zhang, Qin
    Wang, Bojie
    Dai, Luwei
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 39
  • [46] Supply-demand analysis of ecosystem services based on socioeconomic and climate scenarios in North China
    Ding, Honghao
    Sun, Ranhao
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 146
  • [47] Spatial imbalance and changes in supply and demand of ecosystem services in China
    Wang, Jing
    Zhai, Tianlin
    Lin, Yifan
    Kong, Xuesong
    He, Ting
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 657 : 781 - 791
  • [48] Ecosystem service synergies/trade-offs informing the supply-demand match of ecosystem services: Framework and application
    Wang, Lijuan
    Zheng, Hua
    Wen, Zhi
    Liu, Lei
    Robinson, Brian E.
    Li, Ruonan
    Li, Cong
    Kong, Lingqiao
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 37
  • [49] Drivers of spatiotemporal disparities in the supply-demand budget of ecosystem services: A case study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, China
    Li, Zu Zheng
    Hu, Baoan
    Qin, Yangyi
    Cheng, Xiaoqin
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [50] Advancing the optimization of urban–rural ecosystem service supply-demand mismatches and trade-offs
    Guangji Fang
    Xiao Sun
    Ranhao Sun
    Qinghua Liu
    Yu Tao
    Peng Yang
    Huajun Tang
    Landscape Ecology, 39