Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias

被引:181
|
作者
Dalton, Derek [1 ]
Ortegren, Marc [2 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Coll Business & Behav Sci, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Robert Morris Univ, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
gender; social desirability response bias; ethics research; DECISION-MAKING; BUSINESS STUDENTS; ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR; SELF-EVALUATION; TRAIT; PERCEPTIONS; ASSESSMENTS; ATTITUDES; VALUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-011-0843-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Gender is one of the most frequently studied variables within the ethics literature. In prior studies that find gender differences, females consistently report more ethical responses than males. However, prior research also indicates that females are more prone to responding in a socially desirable fashion. Consequently, it is uncertain whether gender differences in ethical decision-making exist because females are more ethical or perhaps because females are more prone to the social desirability response bias. Using a sample of 30 scenarios from prior studies that find gender differences, we examine whether these gender differences remain robust once social desirability is controlled for in the analysis. Our data suggest that the effect of gender on ethical decision-making is largely attenuated once social desirability is included in the analysis. In essence, the social desirability response bias appears to be driving a significant portion of the relationship between gender and ethical decision-making. We discuss several important research implications of this study.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 93
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Associations between Hofstede's cultural constructs and social desirability response bias
    Bernardi, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2006, 65 (01) : 43 - 53
  • [42] Importance of Social Origin for Gender Differences in Educational Outcomes
    Luehe, Josefine
    Becker, Michael
    Neumann, Marko
    Maaz, Kai
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE DER ERZIEHUNG UND SOZIALISATION, 2017, 37 (04) : 416 - 436
  • [43] Social Desirability and Response Bias in Case of the Division of Household Labour The Interaction between Gender of the Interviewer and Respondent Characteristics in Telephone Interviews
    Klein, Markus
    Kuehhirt, Michael
    [J]. METHODS DATA ANALYSES, 2010, 4 (02): : 79 - 104
  • [44] Gender differences in how authors "hype" the importance of their research
    Mills, Ira
    Kundu, Suze
    Schijvenaars, Bob J. A.
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2022, 38 : 23 - 24
  • [45] Gender differences in social desirability and approval biases, and associations with diet quality in young adults
    Tang, Jei Sey
    Haslam, Rebecca L.
    Ashton, Lee M.
    Fenton, Sasha
    Collins, Clare E.
    [J]. APPETITE, 2022, 175
  • [46] Using inferred valuation to quantify survey and social desirability bias in stated preference research
    Entem, Alicia
    Lloyd-Smith, Patrick
    Adamowicz, Wiktor L.
    Boxall, Peter C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 104 (04) : 1224 - 1242
  • [47] Methodological issues in whistle-blowing intentions research: addressing the social desirability bias and order effect bias
    Ahmad, Syahrul Ahmar
    Ismail, Ida Suriya
    Azmi, Nurul Azlin
    Zakaria, Nor Balkish
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT (ICGSM) 2014, 2014, 145 : 204 - 210
  • [48] Social Desirability Response Bias in Transplant Candidates' Self-Report of Psychosocial Variables
    Stonerock, G. L.
    Smith, P. J.
    Hoffman, B. M.
    Ingle, K. K.
    Saulino, C. K.
    Blumenthal, J. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 36 (04): : S208 - S208
  • [49] Gender differences in self-report measures of anger: The role of social desirability and negative affect
    Bartz, AE
    Blume, NE
    Rose, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 1996, 11 (05): : 241 - 253
  • [50] Controlling social-desirability bias via method factors of direct and indirect questioning in structural equation models
    Jo, MS
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2000, 17 (02) : 137 - 148