Functional bold MRI: advantages of the 3 T vs. the 1.5 T

被引：9
|
作者：
Garcia-Eulate, Reyes [1 ,2 ]
Garcia-Garcia, David [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Dominguez, Pablo D. [1 ,2 ]
Noguera, Jose J. [1 ,2 ]
De Luis, Esther [1 ,2 ]
Rodriguez-Oroz, Maria C. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zubieta, Jose L. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Neuroradiol, Pamplona 31008, Spain
[2] Univ Navarra, Sch Med, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain
[3] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Neurosci Div, Pamplona 31008, Spain
[4] Univ Navarra, Sch Med, CIMA, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain
[5] CIBERNED Spanish Govt, Madrid, Spain
来源：
CLINICAL IMAGING | 2011年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词：
Functional MRI; Motor task; Somatosensory stimulation; Field strength; FIELD-STRENGTH; CONTRAST; OXYGENATION; ACQUISITION; DEPENDENCE; CORTEX; TESLA; FMRI; EPI;
D O I：
10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.07.003
中图分类号：
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要：
We quantitatively evaluate the benefits of a higher field strength for functional brain MRI (fMRI) based on the blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast. The 3-T fMRI shows a higher sensitivity for the motor and somatosensory stimulation and more specific localization in the grey substance. The 3-T fMRI detects additional areas of activation with the motor paradigm. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：236 / 241
页数：6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of 3D BOLD functional MRI with spiral acquisition at 1.5 and 4.0 T
    Yang, YH
    Wen, H
    Mattay, VS
    Balaban, RS
    Frank, JA
    Duyn, JP
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 1999, 9 (04) : 446 - 451
  • [2] Clinical advantages of 3.0 T MRI over 1.5 T
    Willinek, Winfried A.
    Schild, Hans H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 65 (01) : 2 - 14
  • [3] Functional imaging of the parotid glands using blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD)-MRI at 1.5T and 3T
    Simon-Zoula, Sonia C.
    Boesch, Chris
    De Keyzer, Frederik
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 27 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [4] FUNCTIONAL MRI AT 1.5T
    SINGH, M
    KIM, H
    KIM, T
    KHOSLA, D
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1994, 41 (04) : 1649 - 1655
  • [5] MRI PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF PATIENTS WITH DRUG-RESISTANT FOCAL EPILEPSY: 3T VS. 1.5T
    Ladino, L. D.
    Balaguera, P.
    Tellez-Zenteno, J. F.
    Hernandez-Ronquillo, L.
    Delgado, J. A.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2015, 56 : 156 - 156
  • [6] IVIM–DKI for differentiation between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3 T MRI
    Archana Vadiraj Malagi
    Arjunlokesh Netaji
    Virendra Kumar
    Esha Baidya Kayal
    Kedar Khare
    Chandan Jyoti Das
    Fernando Calamante
    Amit Mehndiratta
    [J]. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2022, 35 : 609 - 620
  • [7] Comparison of 1.5T vs. 3T MRI of brain for target delineation in glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) patients
    Al-Dhaibani, N.
    Pervez, N.
    Stanescu, T.
    Fallone, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S653 - S653
  • [8] INFLOW VERSUS DEOXYHEMOGLOBIN EFFECTS IN BOLD FUNCTIONAL MRI USING GRADIENT ECHOES AT 1.5 T
    DUYN, JH
    MOONEN, CTW
    VANYPEREN, GH
    DEBOER, RW
    LUYTEN, PR
    [J]. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 1994, 7 (1-2) : 83 - 88
  • [9] Inflow versus deoxyhemoglobin effect in BOLD functional MRI using gradient echoes at 1.5 T
    Duyn, J.H.
    Moonen, C.T.W.
    Van Yperen, G.H.
    De Boer, R.W.
    Luyten, P.R.
    [J]. NMR in Biomedicine, 1994, 7 (1-2)
  • [10] Cortical Thickness Measurements from 1.5T vs. 3T MRI in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
    Tummala, Subhash
    Chu, Renxin
    Khalid, Fariha
    Dupuy, Sheena
    Tauhid, Shahamat
    Healy, Brian
    Bakshi, Rohit
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2016, 86
12345