Modeling the cost transmission mechanism of the emission trading scheme in China

被引:35
|
作者
Ju Yiyi [1 ]
Kiyoshi, Fujikawa [2 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Int Dev, Nagoya, Aichi 4648601, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Appl Social Syst Inst ASIA, Nagoya, Aichi 4648601, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Consumption-based emissions; Cost transmission; Emission trading scheme; Pilot cities; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; CARBON EMISSIONS; ENERGY; PRICE; CONSUMPTION; IMPACTS; MARKET; NEXUS; LABOR; CHAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.068
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The national emission trading scheme (ETS) in China, CHN-ETS, was established in 2017 following the start of its regional pilot markets in 2013. It will start with a coverage of electricity supply sector and eight pilot regions. Due to a highly regulated dispatch and pricing system in the electricity supply sector, the additional emission abatement costs brought by the ETS cannot be automatically conveyed between consumers and producers in all regions. This paper modeled the cost transmission of ETS in three scenarios based on the quantification results of regional and sectoral emission flows in the electricity supply sector under consumption-based accounting. The results show that the emissions transferred into pilot cities outweighed the emissions transferred out, not only through direct electricity uses but also through the indirect emissions embodied in other sectors that required intermediate inputs from electricity supply sectors in the pilot cities. Through the cost transmission mechanism, the additional abatement cost caused by the national ETS drove the increases in the household consumption of several energy-intensive sectors, including the metal mining sector in Hebei, the petroleum and gas sector in Heilongjiang, and the nonmetal mining sector in Sichuan, with a sensitive increase of 10.1%, 9.9%, and 3.5%, respectively. However, most sectors (745 of the 810) would suffer an increase rate below 0.1%. As long as the household welfare would be ensured, there is still room for the current average market price in the pilot cities to be further increased toward the official guidance price in the nation-wide market.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 182
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Cost of Carbon: Capital Market Effects of the Proposed Emission Trading Scheme (ETS)
    Chapple, Larelle
    Clarkson, Peter M.
    Gold, Daniel L.
    ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2013, 49 (01): : 1 - 33
  • [22] Modeling the Price Mechanism of Carbon Emission Exchange in the European Union Emission Trading System
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Wang, Zhiyun
    Wu, Desheng Dash
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2013, 19 (05): : 1309 - 1323
  • [23] Impacts of the Allocation Mechanism Under the Third Phase of the European Emission Trading Scheme
    Eichhammer, Wolfgang
    Friedrichsen, Nele
    Healy, Sean
    Schumacher, Katja
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (06):
  • [24] The effect of carbon emission trading scheme on energy efficiency: Evidence from China
    Tan, Xiujie
    Liu, Yishuang
    Dong, Hanmin
    Zhang, Zhan
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2022, 75 : 506 - 517
  • [25] Can the Carbon Emission Trading Scheme Influence Industrial Green Production in China?
    Chen, Guang
    Hibiki, Akira
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [26] Emission Trading Scheme and Feed-in Tariff Policy in China: Alternative or Integrated?
    Lin, Wenbin
    Gu, Alun
    Liu, Bin
    Wang, Xin
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, ICAE2014, 2014, 61 : 1323 - 1326
  • [27] Innovative Carbon Allowance Allocation Policy for the Shenzhen Emission Trading Scheme in China
    Ye, Bin
    Jiang, Jingjing
    Miao, Lixin
    Li, Ji
    Peng, Yang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (01):
  • [28] Carbon emission trading scheme and green investor entry: Evidence from China
    Luo, Zijun
    Liu, Yue
    Xu, Weidong
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2025, 91
  • [29] European Union Emission Trading Scheme: A Model for Global Emission Trading System
    Pamukcu, Konuralp
    ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCES-SIYASAL BILGILER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2007, (37): : 17 - 42
  • [30] DOES CARBON EMISSION TRADING MECHANISM REALIZE PORTER EFFECT IN CHINA?
    Zhang, Weihua
    Li, Rui
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2021, 30 (4A): : 4694 - 4703