The Study of Reliability and Validity of the Pain Coping Inventory

被引:8
|
作者
Hocaoglu, Ayla [1 ]
Sertel Berk, Hanife Ozlem [1 ]
Ketenci, Aysegul [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Dept Psychol, Fac Letters, Ordu Caddesi 196, TR-34459 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Dept Phys Rehabil, Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Pain; pain management; pain coping; coping; chronic pain; GENERAL SELF-EFFICACY; STRATEGIES QUESTIONNAIRE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; DEPRESSION; DISABILITY; ANXIETY; ADJUSTMENT; ARTHRITIS; BEHAVIOR; SCALE;
D O I
10.5505/agri.2018.46503
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish form of Pain Coping Inventory (PCI) originally developed by Kraaimaat ve Evers (2003) and where pain coping is conceptualised as the composite of cognitive and behavioral active and passive strategies. Methods: The sample consisted of a total of 279 participants with various pain complaints where 232 were women (83.2%) and 47 were men (16.8%). Besides the Turkish form of PCI, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire-2, Ways of Coping Inventory and Pain Coping Questionnaire were used to determine criterion and convergent validity of the scale. Results: The principal component analysis revealed that the scale had six factors of distraction, pain transformation, comforting thinking, worrying, resting and withdrawal. The internal consistency of the subscales varied between .53ile.77. The correlations of the subscales of PCI with criterion and convergent validity scales were significant. Conclusion: The results suggest that PCI can be a useful tool for assessing coping strategies of pain patients with varying complaints of pain.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 41
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reliability and validity of the career influence inventory: A pilot study
    Fisher, TA
    Stafford, ME
    JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 1999, 7 (02) : 187 - 202
  • [22] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE JAPANESE VERSION OF THE COPING INVENTORY FOR ADULTS FOR STRESSFUL SITUATIONS IN HEALTHY PEOPLE
    Watanabe, K.
    Yokoyama, K. .
    Furukawa, T. A.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2015, 116 (02) : 447 - 469
  • [23] The reliability and validity of a Wellness Inventory
    Owen, TR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 1999, 13 (03) : 180 - 182
  • [24] The Pain Disability Questionnaire: a reliability and validity study
    Moreira Giordano, Patricia Cantu
    Costa Alexandre, Neusa Maria
    Matheus Rodrigues, Roberta Cunha
    Orpinelli Coluci, Marina Zambon
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2012, 20 (01): : 76 - 83
  • [25] Reliability and validity of a modified Brief Pain Inventory short form in patients with osteoarthritis
    Mendoza, T
    Mayne, T
    Rublee, D
    Cleeland, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2006, 10 (04) : 353 - 361
  • [26] Reliability and validity of the Brief Pain Inventory in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Chen, Y. -W.
    HajGhanbari, B.
    Road, J. D.
    Coxson, H. O.
    Camp, P. G.
    Reid, W. D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2018, 22 (10) : 1718 - 1726
  • [27] Scale of Coping Strategies with Cyberbullying for Teachers: validity and reliability study
    Altundag, Yunus
    Ayas, Tuncay
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 19 : 84 - 92
  • [28] Construct Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the Coping Inventory (CI) for Children With Developmental Disabilities
    Beetham, Kassia S.
    Bundy, Anita C.
    Wyver, Shirley
    Ragen, Jo
    Villeneuve, Michelle
    Tranter, Paul
    Naughton, Geraldine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2019, 73 (04):
  • [29] A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale
    Chesney, Margaret A.
    Neilands, Torsten B.
    Chambers, Donald B.
    Taylor, Jonelle M.
    Folkman, Susan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 11 : 421 - 437
  • [30] Proactive coping inventory (Spanish): Initial factorial validity, reliability, and cross-lagged relations
    Gutierrez-Dona, Benicio
    Schwarzer, Ralf
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 47 : 5 - 6