Slow component apparent diffusion coefficient for prostate cancer: Comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic evaluation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging

被引:4
|
作者
Ogura, Akio [1 ]
Maeda, Fumie [2 ]
Yahata, Seiji [3 ]
Koyama, Daisuke [4 ]
Tsunoda, Fumiya [5 ]
Hayashi, Norio [1 ]
Motegi, Shunichi [6 ]
Yamamura, Kenichiro [7 ]
机构
[1] Gunma Prefectural Coll Hlth Sci, Grad Sch, 323-1 Kamioki Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
[2] Kyoto City Hosp, Dept Radiol, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Tokyo Womens Med Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Natl Hosp Org Matsumoto Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
[5] Japanese Red Cross Asikaga Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ashikaga, Tochigi, Japan
[6] Josai Clin, Dept Radiol, Togane, Chiba, Japan
[7] Osaka Med Coll Hosp, Dept Radiol, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Diagnostic imaging; Prostate; NEPHROGENIC SYSTEMIC FIBROSIS; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; GRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2019.01.003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE)-MRI has high diagnostic performance of prostate cancer. However, it is preferable to avoid the use of MRI contrast media. A study reported that the diagnosability of the wash-in index of DCE-MRI was equivalent to the intravoxel incoherent motion of the diffusion weighted image. The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation between the slow component apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the wash-out index of the DCE. Materials and methods: Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with prostate cancer by biopsy were enrolled in this study. The fast and slow component ADCs of the DWI were calculated for 76 points of the tumor and the contralateral normal parts. Furthermore, the wash-in and wash-out indices of the DCE-MRI were calculated. The correlations for each calculated index were compared. Results: There was a significant difference between the tumor and the contralateral normal parts for both fast (p = 0.03) and slow component (p < 0.01) ADCs. In addition, the slow component ADC was correlated with the wash-out index (r = 0.64). Conclusion: The slow component ADC was correlated with the wash-out index, and may, therefore, be a suitable substitute for DCE-MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 17
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Celiac Disease: Evaluation with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    Masselli, Gabriele
    Picarelli, Antonio
    Di Tola, Marco
    Libanori, Valerio
    Donato, Giuseppe
    Polettini, Elisabetta
    Piermattei, Alessandra
    Palumbo, Piergaspare
    Pittalis, Angelo
    Saponara, Annarita
    Gualdi, Gianfranco
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 256 (03) : 783 - 790
  • [22] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma: Correlation with Detailed Histologic Features and the Enhancement Ratio on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images
    Matsubayashi, Roka Namoto
    Fujii, Teruhiko
    Yasumori, Kotaro
    Muranaka, Toru
    Momosaki, Seiya
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 2010
  • [23] Pulmonary perfusion: Evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Hatabu, H
    Tadamura, E
    Kim, D
    Li, W
    Prasad, PV
    Edelman, RR
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 407 - 407
  • [24] Variability induced by the MR imager in dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of the prostate
    Brunelle, S.
    Zemmour, C.
    Bratan, F.
    Mege-Lechevallier, F.
    Ruffion, A.
    Colombel, M.
    Crouzet, S.
    Sarran, A.
    Rouviere, O.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2018, 99 (04) : 255 - 264
  • [25] Modified MR dispersion imaging in prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Sung, Kyunghyun
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (04) : 1307 - 1317
  • [26] Correlation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging with Histopathological Tumor Grade in Prostate Cancer: Percent Enhancement a Novel Technique
    McClure, T.
    Margolis, D.
    Gomez, A.
    Raman, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (05)
  • [27] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer
    Kabadi, Suraj J.
    Fatterpekar, Girish M.
    Anzai, Yoshimi
    Mogen, Jonathan
    Hagiwara, Mari
    Patel, Sohil H.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 26 (01) : 135 - +
  • [28] Evaluation of Depth of Myometrial Invasion and Overall Staging in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Diffusion-weighted and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    Beddy, Peter
    Moyle, Penelope
    Kataoka, Masako
    Yamamoto, Adam K.
    Joubert, Ilse
    Lomas, David
    Crawford, Robin
    Sala, Evis
    RADIOLOGY, 2012, 262 (02) : 530 - 537
  • [29] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging With Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping for Breast Cancer Detection as a Stand-Alone Parameter Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Pinker, Katja
    Moy, Linda
    Sutton, Elizabeth J.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Weber, Michael
    Thakur, Sunitha B.
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2018, 53 (10) : 587 - 595
  • [30] Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted MR imaging and Gleason score in prostate cancer
    Wu, X.
    Reinikainen, P.
    Vanhanen, A.
    Kapanen, M.
    Vierikko, T.
    Ryymin, P.
    Hyodynmaa, S.
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P. -L.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2017, 98 (01) : 63 - 71