共 21 条
Dosimetric and Monte Carlo verification of jaws-only IMRT plans calculated by the Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm for head and neck cancers
被引:12
|作者:
Duong Thanh Tai
[1
,2
,4
]
Luong Thi Oanh
[2
,4
]
Nguyen Dong Son
[3
]
Truong Thi Hong Loan
[2
]
Chow, James C. L.
[5
,6
]
机构:
[1] Dong Nai Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Bien Hoa 810000, Vietnam
[2] Univ Sci, VNUHCM, Fac Phys & Engn Phys, Ho Chi Minh 749000, Vietnam
[3] Chi Anh Med Technol Co Ltd, Ho Chi Minh 717066, Vietnam
[4] Nguyen Tat Thanh Univ, Fac Med, Ho Chi Minh 702000, Vietnam
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
[6] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada
关键词:
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT);
Jaws-only IMRT (JO-IMRT);
Quality assurance (QA);
Monte Carlo simulation (MC);
CERR;
DOSCTP;
BEAM;
D O I:
10.1016/j.rpor.2018.11.004
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Aim: The aim of this study is to verify the Prowess Panther jaws-only intensity modulated radiation therapy (JO-IMRT) treatment planning (TP) by comparing the TP dose distributions for head-and-neck (H&N) cancer with the ones simulated by Monte Carlo (MC). Background: To date, dose distributions planned using JO-IMRT for H&N patients were found superior to the corresponding three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plans. Dosimetry of the JO-IMRT plans were also experimentally verified using an ionization chamber, MapCHECK 2, and Octavius 4D and good agreements were shown. Materials and methods: Dose distributions of 15 JO-IMRT plans of nasopharyngeal patients were recalculated using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code. The clinical photon beams were simulated using the BEAMnrc. The absorbed dose to patients treated by fixed-field IMRT was computed using the DOSXYZnrc. The simulated dose distributions were then compared with the ones calculated by the Collapsed Cone Convolution (CCC) algorithm on the TPS, using the relative dose error comparison and the gamma index using global methods implemented in PTW-VeriSoft with 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, 1%/1 mm criteria. Results: There is a good agreement between the MC and TPS dose. The average gamma passing rates were 93.3 +/- 3.1%, 92.8 +/- 3.2%, 92.4 +/- 3.4% based on the 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, 1%/1 mm criteria, respectively. Conclusions: According to the results, it is concluded that the CCC algorithm was adequate for most of the IMRT H&N cases where the target was not immediately adjacent to the critical structures. (C) 2018 Greater Poland Cancer Centre. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 114
页数:10
相关论文