Comparison of the electrical stimulation performance of four cochlear implant electrodes

被引:6
|
作者
Choi, CTM [1 ]
Lai, WD [1 ]
Chen, YB [1 ]
机构
[1] I Shou Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
activating function; cochlear implant electrodes; electrical stimulation; finite-element analysis;
D O I
10.1109/TMAG.2005.846228
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a method to compare the neural excitation of four different cochlear implant electrodes by coupling finite-element analysis and computational neuroscience method. The goal is to identify the type of electrodes and electrode positions that will maximize the neural excitation of the human cochlea. Electrodes are moved translationally and rotationally in the inner cochlea based on straight and circular cochlea models. The four electrodes modeled are the banded electrodes, half banded electrodes, planar electrodes, and ball electrodes, and they were rotated from +180 degrees to -180 degrees. The planar electrode generates the highest stimulation of the four electrodes for a given electrical power input. This paper also proposes means to compute directions which the electrode should point to in order to maximize the neural excitation of a human cochlea.
引用
收藏
页码:1920 / 1923
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the effects of four different cochlear implant electrodes on intra-cochlear pressure in a model
    Todt, Ingo
    Mittmann, Marlene
    Ernst, Arneborg
    Mittmann, Philipp
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2017, 137 (03) : 235 - 241
  • [2] Comparison of procedures to determine electrical stimulation thresholds in cochlear implant users
    van Wieringen, A
    Wouters, J
    EAR AND HEARING, 2001, 22 (06): : 528 - 538
  • [3] PREOPERATIVE ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT SELECTION - THE USE OF EAR CANAL ELECTRODES VERSUS TRANSTYMPANIC ELECTRODES
    SPIES, TH
    SNIK, AFM
    MENS, LHM
    VANDENBROEK, P
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1993, 113 (05) : 579 - 584
  • [4] Effect of reducing electrical stimulation rate on hearing performance of Nucleus® cochlear implant recipients
    Arora, Komal
    Plant, Kerrie
    Dawson, Pam
    Cowan, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2025, 64 (02) : 173 - 182
  • [5] Electropermeabilization of Adherent Cells with Cochlear Implant Electrical Stimulation in vitro
    Newbold, Carrie
    Farrington, Andrew
    Peters, Lawson
    Cowan, Robert
    Needham, Karina
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2014, 19 (05) : 283 - 292
  • [6] STAPEDIUS REFLEX TO ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION IN A PATIENT WITH A COCHLEAR IMPLANT
    JERGER, J
    JENKINS, H
    FIFER, R
    MECKLENBURG, D
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1986, 95 (02): : 151 - 157
  • [7] SUPPRESSION OF TINNITUS BY ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION IN COCHLEAR IMPLANT PATIENTS
    BATTMER, RD
    HEERMANN, R
    LASZIG, R
    HNO, 1989, 37 (04) : 148 - 152
  • [8] Increase in cochlear implant electrode impedances with the use of electrical stimulation
    Saoji, Aniket A.
    Adkins, Weston J.
    Olund, Amy P.
    Graham, Madison
    Patel, Neil S.
    Neff, Brian A.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 59 (11) : 881 - 888
  • [9] Modelling of the electrical stimulation delivered by the DIGISONIC Multichannel cochlear implant
    Gallego, S.
    Luu, B.L.
    Berger-Vachon, Ch.
    Advances in Modeling and Analysis B, 1998, 39 (01): : 39 - 53
  • [10] Auditory cortex activation by direct cochlear implant electrical stimulation
    Lazeyras, F
    Boëx, C
    Sigrist, A
    Cosendai, G
    Terrier, F
    Pelizzone, M
    NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 13 (06) : S905 - S905