Application of droplet digital PCR for quantitative detection of Spiroplasma citri in comparison with real time PCR

被引:42
|
作者
Maheshwari, Yogita [1 ]
Selvaraj, Vijayanandraj [1 ]
Hajeri, Subhas [2 ]
Yokomi, Raymond [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, San Joaquin Valley Agr Sci Ctr, Parlier, CA 93648 USA
[2] Cent Calif Tristeza Eradicat Agcy, Citrus Pest Detect Program, Tulare, CA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 09期
关键词
DNA COPY NUMBER; STUBBORN DISEASE; QUANTIFICATION; NAVEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0184751
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is a method for performing digital PCR that is based on water-oil emulsion droplet technology. It is a unique approach to measure the absolute copy number of nucleic acid targets without the need of external standards. This study evaluated the applicability of ddPCR as a quantitative detection tool for the Spiroplasma citri, causal agent of citrus stubborn disease (CSD) in citrus. Two sets of primers, SP1, based on the spiral in housekeeping gene, and a multicopy prophage gene, SpV1 ORF1, were used to evaluate ddPCR in comparison with real time (quantitative) PCR (qPCR) for S. citri detection in citrus tissues. Standard curve analyses on tenfold dilution series showed that both ddPCR and qPCR exhibited good linearity and efficiency. However, ddPCR had a tenfold greater sensitivity than qPCR and accurately quantified up to one copy of spiralin gene. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that the ddPCR methodology was more robust for diagnosis of CSD and the area under the curve was significantly broader compared to qPCR. Field samples were used to validate ddPCR efficacy and demonstrated that it was equal or better than qPCR to detect S. citri infection in fruit columella due to a higher pathogen titer. The ddPCR assay detected both the S. citri spiralin and the SpV1 ORF1 targets quantitatively with high precision and accuracy compared to qPCR assay. The ddPCR was highly reproducible and repeatable for both the targets and showed higher resilience to PCR inhibitors in citrus tissue extract for the quantification of S. citri compare to qPCR.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Droplet digital PCR for routine analysis of genetically modified foods (GMO) - A comparison with real-time quantitative PCR
    Iwobi, Azuka
    Gerdes, Lars
    Busch, Ulrich
    Pecoraro, Sven
    FOOD CONTROL, 2016, 69 : 205 - 213
  • [22] Detection and Quantification of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Fecal Samples Using Digital Droplet PCR in Comparison with Real-Time PCR
    Feng, Junxia
    Cui, Xiaohu
    Du, Bing
    Zhao, Hanqing
    Feng, Yanling
    Cui, Jinghua
    Yan, Chao
    Gan, Lin
    Fan, Zheng
    Fu, Tongtong
    Xu, Ziying
    Yu, Zihui
    Zhang, Rui
    Du, Shuheng
    Tian, Ziyan
    Zhang, Qun
    Xue, Guanhua
    Yuan, Jing
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2023, 11 (04):
  • [23] Comparison of Microdroplet Digital PCR Assays with Real-time Fluorescence Quantitative PCR for Clostridioides difficile Detection
    Yin, Cai Hong
    Song, Zhan Yun
    Liu, Xing Xing
    Wang, Xiao Mu
    Wang, Ying
    Gao, Cheng Cheng
    Song, Xiu Ling
    Feng, Xin
    BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2023, 36 (07) : 653 - 657
  • [24] Detection and quantification of Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum by droplet digital PCR versus quantitative real-time PCR
    Wang, Di
    Jiao, Xinya
    Jia, Haijiang
    Cheng, Shumei
    Jin, Xi
    Wang, Youhua
    Gao, Yunhua
    Su, Xiaofeng
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [25] Comparison of Microdroplet Digital PCR Assays with Real-time Fluorescence Quantitative PCR for Clostridioides difficile Detection
    YIN Cai Hong
    SONG Zhan Yun
    LIU Xing Xing
    WANG Xiao Mu
    WANG Ying
    GAO Cheng Cheng
    SONG Xiu Ling
    FENG Xin
    Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 36 (07) : 653 - 657
  • [26] Quantification of Lentiviral Vectors Using Quantitative Real-Time PCR vs Digital Droplet PCR
    Dean, Rebecca J.
    MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2022, 30 (04) : 356 - 356
  • [27] Tolerance of Droplet-Digital PCR vs Real-Time Quantitative PCR to Inhibitory Substances
    Dingle, Tanis C.
    Sedlak, Ruth Hall
    Cook, Linda
    Jerome, Keith R.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 59 (11) : 1670 - 1672
  • [28] Droplet Digital PCR for Quantitative Detection of Escherichia Coli
    Yang, Jiayi
    Fu, Boqiang
    Niu, Chunyan
    Wang, Jing
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE FRONTIERS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING (FBB 2019), 2019, 2110
  • [29] Comparison of droplet digital PCR to real-time PCR for quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA
    Tang, Hui
    Cai, Qingchun
    Li, Hu
    Hu, Peng
    BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2016, 80 (11) : 2159 - 2164
  • [30] Droplet digital PCR improves urinary exosomal miRNA detection compared to real-time PCR
    Wang, Cong
    Ding, Qiang
    Plant, Pamela
    Basheer, Mayada
    Yang, Chuance
    Tawedrous, Eriny
    Krizova, Adriana
    Boulos, Carl
    Farag, Mina
    Cheng, Yufeng
    Yousef, George M.
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2019, 67 : 54 - 59