Comparative Effectiveness Research The View from a Pharmaceutical Company

被引:12
|
作者
Berger, Marc L. [1 ]
Grainger, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Corp Ctr, Global Hlth Outcomes, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
SECONDARY DATA SOURCES; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.2165/11535400-000000000-00000
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) represents the next stage in an evolution of research and knowledge development in regard to medical interventions In this article we describe the challenges currently facing the innovative pharmaceuticals Industry and briefly summarize the history of drug development, as context for the current movement to comparative effectiveness. CER should be considered alongside the wider field of health technology assessment (HTA). and we review the status of both CER and HTA internationally and their role in health policy. Limitations as to what can be achieved with HTA and limitations to the availability of evidence of comparative effectiveness at the time of market authorization provide ongoing challenges to all stakeholders However, embracing CER is regarded as an essential step for the innovative pharmaceutical industry, as companies strive to more clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of their pipeline products with evidence that is compelling to payers and HTA agencies Examples are given of how these evolving requirements from regulatory and HTA agencies are impacting on drug development efforts and how one company is responding. Finally, there are signs of increasing understanding and alignment across the various partners in drug development, registration and evaluation, and further suggestions are provided for consideration as the field matures and expands.
引用
收藏
页码:915 / 922
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Effectiveness Regulations and Pharmaceutical Innovation
    Vernon, John A.
    Golec, Joseph H.
    Stevens, J. Stedman
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2010, 28 (10) : 877 - 887
  • [22] Comparative Effectiveness Regulations and Pharmaceutical Innovation
    John A. Vernon
    Joseph H. Golec
    J. Stedman Stevens
    PharmacoEconomics, 2010, 28 : 877 - 887
  • [23] ORGANIZATION OF A RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY IN A PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
    FISHBURN, AG
    ANNALES PHARMACEUTIQUES FRANCAISES, 1969, 27 (12): : 762 - &
  • [24] The FDA guidance for industry on PROs: the point of view of a pharmaceutical company
    Fabio Arpinelli
    Francesco Bamfi
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4
  • [25] The FDA guidance for industry on PROs: the point of view of a pharmaceutical company
    Arpinelli, Fabio
    Bamfi, Francesco
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2006, 4 (1)
  • [26] SIGNIFICANCE OF PHARMACOPATHOLOGICAL VIEW IN PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
    KALMAN, B
    ACTA MORPHOLOGICA ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE, 1973, : 141 - 141
  • [27] Cardiovascular Drug Discovery: A Perspective from a Research-Based Pharmaceutical Company
    Gromo, G.
    Mann, J.
    Fitzgerald, J. D.
    COLD SPRING HARBOR PERSPECTIVES IN MEDICINE, 2014, 4 (06):
  • [28] Quality Quandaries: Improving the Overall Equipment Effectiveness at a Pharmaceutical Company
    Kuiper, Alex
    van Raalte, Michiel
    Does, Ronald J. M. M.
    QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2014, 26 (04) : 478 - 483
  • [29] THE FUTURE-RESEARCH AGENDA - A VIEW FROM THE PHARMACEUTICAL-INDUSTRY
    BARR, C
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1994, 6 : 61 - 62
  • [30] Progress in cannabis research from a pharmaceutical chemist's point of view
    Mueller, Christa E.
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2019, 62 (07) : 818 - 824