Evaluations of urban atmospheric transport and dispersion models using data from the joint urban 2003 field experiment

被引：0
|
作者：
Urban, Jeffry T. [1 ]
Warner, Steve [1 ]
Platt, Nathan [1 ]
Heagy, James F. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Inst Def Anal, Alexandria, VA 22311 USA
来源：
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION | 2011年 / 47卷 / 1-4期
关键词：
atmospheric transport and dispersion; point-to-point protocol; model evaluations; urban models; HPAC; MESO/RUSTIC; QUIC-URB/QUIC-PLUME; joint urban 2003; PREDICTIONS;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号：
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要：
We have evaluated the performance of several urban Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion (AT&D) models by comparing model predictions to tracer gas concentrations measured during the Joint Urban 2003 field experiment in Oklahoma City, USA. These models include the Urban Canopy, Urban Dispersion Model (UDM), and Micro-SWIFT/SPRAY (MSS) modes within the HPAC modelling suite, QUIC-URB/QUIC-PLUME models, and the MESO/RUSTIC models. We discuss some of the results of these comparisons, including relative model performance according to bias and scatter metrics, differences in model behaviour for predictions of daytime vs. nighttime releases, and operational considerations such as runtime differences.
引用
收藏
页码：49 / 59
页数：11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparisons of transport and dispersion model predictions of the joint urban 2003 field experiment
    Warner, Steve
    Platt, Nathan
    Urban, Jeffry T.
    Heagy, James F.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2008, 47 (07) : 1910 - 1928
  • [2] QUIC transport and dispersion modelling of two releases from the Joint Urban 2003 field experiment
    Brown, Michael J.
    Gowardhan, Akshay A.
    Nelson, Mathew A.
    Williams, Michael D.
    Pardyjak, Eric R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2013, 52 (3-4) : 263 - 287
  • [3] Assessment of HPAC urban modelling capabilities using data from the Joint Urban 2003 field experiment
    Urban, Jeffry T.
    Warner, Steve
    Platt, Nathan
    Heagy, James F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2011, 44 (1-4) : 24 - 31
  • [4] Four Diagnostic Urban Wind Flow and Dispersion Models Tested with Joint Urban 2003 Field Data
    Hanna, S.
    White, J.
    Trolier, J.
    Vernot, R.
    Brown, M.
    Kaplan, H.
    Alexander, Y.
    Moussafir, J.
    Wang, Y.
    Hannan, J.
    Fry, R.
    Kiley, C.
    Hendrick, E.
    AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XX, 2010, : 39 - +
  • [5] Evaluation of a fast-running urban dispersion modeling system using Joint Urban 2003 field data
    Hendricks, Eric A.
    Diehl, Steve R.
    Burrows, Donald A.
    Keith, Robert
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (12) : 2165 - 2179
  • [6] Evaluation of Turbulence and Dispersion in Multiscale Atmospheric Simulations over Complex Urban Terrain during the Joint Urban 2003 Field Campaign
    Wiersema, David J.
    Lundquist, Katherine A.
    Mirocha, Jeffrey D.
    Chow, Fotini Katopodes
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2022, 150 (12) : 3195 - 3209
  • [7] The analysis of data from an urban dispersion experiment
    Venkatram, A
    Isakov, V
    Pankratz, D
    Heumann, J
    Yuan, J
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (22) : 3647 - 3659
  • [8] Virtual towers using coherent Doppler lidar during the Joint Urban 2003 dispersion experiment
    Calhoun, R.
    Heap, R.
    Princevac, M.
    Newsom, R.
    Fernando, H.
    Ligon, D.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2006, 45 (08) : 1116 - 1126
  • [9] Comparison of an Analytical Urban Puff-Dispersion Model with Tracer Observations From the Joint Urban 2003 Field Campaign
    Steven Hanna
    Joseph Chang
    Thomas Mazzola
    Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2019, 171 : 377 - 393
  • [10] Comparison of an Analytical Urban Puff-Dispersion Model with Tracer Observations From the Joint Urban 2003 Field Campaign
    Hanna, Steven
    Chang, Joseph
    Mazzola, Thomas
    BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2019, 171 (03) : 377 - 393
12345