Strategic approach to fit-for-purpose biomarkers in drug development

被引:89
|
作者
Wagner, John A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Merck & Co Inc, Merck Res Labs, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Rahway, NJ 07065 USA
关键词
qualification; surrogate endpoint; target engagement; validation;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094611
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The strategic, fit-for-purpose use of the combination of robust target engagement and well-qualified disease-related biomarkers enhances understanding of the mechanism of action, ties together preclinical and clinical data, enables the assessment of target engagement, facilitates early proof of concept and dose focusing, and increases the efficiency of early clinical development with improved quality of decision making. Significant progress in biomarker discovery, validation, and qualification has increased drug-development decision making and regulatory applications. Target engagement biomarkers are present early in a pathophysiologic cascade and inform on physical or biological interactions with the molecular target of the drug. Disease-related biomarkers are present late in the pathophysiologic cascade and are linked to clinical benefit; thus, they assess a drug's effect on a particular disease. Together, these concepts lay the groundwork for high-quality drug-development decision making and a framework for the acceptance and qualification of biomarkers for regulatory use.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 651
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fit-for-Purpose Immunohistochemical Biomarkers
    Torlakovic, Emina Emilia
    [J]. ENDOCRINE PATHOLOGY, 2018, 29 (02) : 199 - 205
  • [2] Fit-for-Purpose Immunohistochemical Biomarkers
    Emina Emilia Torlakovic
    [J]. Endocrine Pathology, 2018, 29 : 199 - 205
  • [3] Fit-for-purpose biomarker method validation in anticancer drug development
    Cummings, Jeffrey
    Ward, Tim H.
    Dive, Caroline
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2010, 15 (19-20) : 816 - 825
  • [4] The development process of 'fit-for-purpose' imaging biomarkers to characterize the tumor microenvironment
    Eertink, Jakoba J.
    Bahce, Idris
    Waterton, John C.
    Huisman, Marc C.
    Boellaard, Ronald
    Wunder, Andreas
    Thiele, Andrea
    van Oordt, Catharina W. Menke-van der Houven
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [5] Fit-for-purpose pharmacogenomic biomarkers in drug development: a project team case study with 'what-ifs'
    Surh, Linda C.
    Lesko, Lawrence J.
    Hobbs, Stuart
    Gutman, Steve
    Minasian, Lori M.
    Della Pasqua, Oscar E.
    Austin, M. J. Finley
    Lu, Kan
    [J]. PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2009, 10 (01) : 137 - 147
  • [6] A reflection on fit-for-purpose metabolite investigation at different stages of drug development
    Leclercq, Laurent
    [J]. BIOANALYSIS, 2014, 6 (05) : 591 - 594
  • [7] A FIT-FOR-PURPOSE APPROACH TO NONCLINICAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ADALIMUMAB AND INFLIXIMAB BIOSIMILAR DEVELOPMENT
    Ripp, Sharon L.
    Bolt, Michael
    Derzi, Mazin
    Finch, Gregory L.
    Hurst, Susan
    Johnson, Theodore J.
    Leach, Michael W.
    Smolarek, Teresa A.
    [J]. DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 2015, 47 : 106 - 106
  • [8] Fit-for-purpose Land Administration for Sustainable Development
    Enemark, Stig
    [J]. GIM INTERNATIONAL-THE WORLDWIDE MAGAZINE FOR GEOMATICS, 2016, 30 (08): : 16 - 19
  • [9] Application of a Framework Qualifying Fit-for-Purpose Physiological Models to Drug Discovery and Development
    Azer, Karim
    Sachs, Jeffrey R.
    Cho, Carolyn R.
    Kerbusch, Thomas
    Cabal, Antonio
    Gibson, Christopher R.
    Allerheiligen, Sandra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2016, 43 : S26 - S27
  • [10] Fit-for-purpose sampling
    Moy, Corrine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2015, 57 (03) : 491 - 494