Development and Validation of the Systems Thinking Scale

被引:31
|
作者
Dolansky, Mary A. [1 ]
Moore, Shirley M. [1 ]
Palmieri, Patrick A. [2 ]
Singh, Mamta K. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Frances Payne Bolton Sch Nursing, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Summa Hlth Syst, Traumat Stress Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Akron, OH USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Off Curricular Affairs, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Ctr Excellence Primary Care Educ, Coordinating Ctr, Off Acad Affiliat, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] Vet Affairs, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
HEALTH SYSTEMS; SAFETY; COMPETENCE; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-020-05830-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Systems thinking is the ability to recognize and synthesize patterns, interactions, and interdependencies in a set of activities and is a key component in quality and safety. A measure of systems thinking is needed to advance our understanding of the mechanisms that contribute to improvement efforts. The purpose of this study was to develop and conduct psychometric testing of a systems thinking scale (STS). Methods The development of the STS included obtaining national quality and safety experts' conceptual domains of systems thinking and the generation of a provisional set of items. Further psychometric analyses were conducted with interprofessional healthcare faculty (N = 342) and students (N = 224) engaged in quality improvement initiatives and education. Results Of the 26 items identified in the development phase, factor analyses indicated three factors: (1) system thinking (20 items), (2) personal effort (2 items), and (3) reliance on authority (4 items). The six items from factors 2 and 3 were omitted due to low factor loadings. Test-retest reliability of the 20-item STS was performed on 36 healthcare professionals and a correlation of 0.74 was found. Internal consistency testing on a sample of 342 healthcare professionals using Cronbach's alpha showed a coefficient of 0.89. Discriminant validity was confirmed with three groups of healthcare professions students (N = 102) who received high, low, or no dose levels of systems thinking education in the context of process improvement. Conclusions The 20-item STS is a valid and reliable instrument that is easy to administer and takes less than 10 min to complete. Further research using the STS has the potential to advance the science and education of quality improvement in two main ways: (1) increase understanding of a critical mechanism by which quality improvement processes achieve results, and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of our education to improve systems thinking.
引用
收藏
页码:2314 / 2320
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The development and validation of smoking scale
    Huseynbalayeva, Sabina
    Pakyurek, Gun
    Aksu, Gokhan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE, 2024,
  • [42] Development and Validation of the Homophobia Scale
    Lester W. Wright
    Henry E. Adams
    Jeffery Bernat
    [J]. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 1999, 21 (4) : 337 - 347
  • [43] Development and Validation of the Forbearance Scale
    Ho, Man Yee
    Liang, Siya
    Hook, Joshua N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2023, 105 (06) : 779 - 788
  • [44] Development and validation of a networking scale
    Wolff, Hans-Georg
    Moser, Klaus
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICA, 2006, 52 (04): : 161 - 180
  • [45] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE SEXFLEX SCALE
    Gauvin, Stephanie
    Pukall, Caroline F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (05): : E256 - E256
  • [46] Development and Validation of the ADTRUST Scale
    Soh, Hyeonjin
    Reid, Leonard N.
    King, Karen Whitehill
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2009, 38 (02) : 83 - 103
  • [47] The Development and Validation of a Colorism Scale
    Harvey, Richard D.
    Tennial, Rachel E.
    Banks, Kira Hudson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BLACK PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 43 (07) : 740 - 764
  • [48] Development and Initial Validation of an Instrument to Measure Students' Learning About Systems Thinking: The Affective Domain
    Camelia, Fanny
    Ferris, Timothy L. J.
    Cropley, David H.
    [J]. IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (01): : 115 - 124
  • [49] SYSTEMS THINKING FOR INFORMATION-SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
    XU, LD
    [J]. SYSTEMS PRACTICE, 1995, 8 (06): : 577 - 589
  • [50] Validation of the Magical Thinking Scale: Apocalyptic Prophecies and Negative Affectivity
    Moral de la Rubia, Jose
    [J]. CIENCIA ERGO-SUM, 2012, 19 (02) : 107 - 116