Development and Validation of the Systems Thinking Scale

被引:31
|
作者
Dolansky, Mary A. [1 ]
Moore, Shirley M. [1 ]
Palmieri, Patrick A. [2 ]
Singh, Mamta K. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Frances Payne Bolton Sch Nursing, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Summa Hlth Syst, Traumat Stress Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Akron, OH USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Off Curricular Affairs, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Ctr Excellence Primary Care Educ, Coordinating Ctr, Off Acad Affiliat, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] Vet Affairs, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
HEALTH SYSTEMS; SAFETY; COMPETENCE; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-020-05830-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Systems thinking is the ability to recognize and synthesize patterns, interactions, and interdependencies in a set of activities and is a key component in quality and safety. A measure of systems thinking is needed to advance our understanding of the mechanisms that contribute to improvement efforts. The purpose of this study was to develop and conduct psychometric testing of a systems thinking scale (STS). Methods The development of the STS included obtaining national quality and safety experts' conceptual domains of systems thinking and the generation of a provisional set of items. Further psychometric analyses were conducted with interprofessional healthcare faculty (N = 342) and students (N = 224) engaged in quality improvement initiatives and education. Results Of the 26 items identified in the development phase, factor analyses indicated three factors: (1) system thinking (20 items), (2) personal effort (2 items), and (3) reliance on authority (4 items). The six items from factors 2 and 3 were omitted due to low factor loadings. Test-retest reliability of the 20-item STS was performed on 36 healthcare professionals and a correlation of 0.74 was found. Internal consistency testing on a sample of 342 healthcare professionals using Cronbach's alpha showed a coefficient of 0.89. Discriminant validity was confirmed with three groups of healthcare professions students (N = 102) who received high, low, or no dose levels of systems thinking education in the context of process improvement. Conclusions The 20-item STS is a valid and reliable instrument that is easy to administer and takes less than 10 min to complete. Further research using the STS has the potential to advance the science and education of quality improvement in two main ways: (1) increase understanding of a critical mechanism by which quality improvement processes achieve results, and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of our education to improve systems thinking.
引用
收藏
页码:2314 / 2320
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and Validation of the Systems Thinking Scale
    Mary A. Dolansky
    Shirley M. Moore
    Patrick A. Palmieri
    Mamta K. Singh
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2020, 35 : 2314 - 2320
  • [2] The development and validation of Dichotomous thinking scale
    Oshia, Atsushi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 469 - 469
  • [3] Design thinking mindset: scale development and validation
    Vignoli, Matteo
    Dosi, Clio
    Balboni, Bernardo
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 48 (06) : 926 - 940
  • [4] Scale development and validation of Transaction Cost Economics typology for contracts: A systems thinking approach
    Cevikparmak, Sedat
    Celik, Hasan
    Adana, Saban
    Uvet, Hasan
    Sauser, Brian
    Nowicki, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, 2022, 28 (03)
  • [5] The Development and Initial Validation of the Paradigm of Systems Thinking
    Randle, Jason M.
    Stroink, Mirella L.
    [J]. SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2018, 35 (06) : 645 - 657
  • [6] Development and validation of the language teachers' adaptive thinking scale
    Zohoorian, Zahra
    Sadr, Nader Matin
    Zeraatpisheh, Mitra
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2023, 48
  • [7] The development and validation of the scale of design thinking for teaching (SDTT)
    Cai, Yuyang
    Yang, Yan
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2023, 48
  • [8] Development and validation of the counterfactual thinking for negative events scale
    Rye, Mark S.
    Cahoon, Melissa B.
    Ali, Rahan S.
    Daftary, Tarika
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2008, 90 (03) : 261 - 269
  • [9] The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale
    Sosu, Edward M.
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2013, 9 : 107 - 119
  • [10] TQM in systems development: Scale development and validation
    Ravichandran, T
    [J]. DECISION SCIENCES INSTITUTE, 1997 ANNUAL MEETING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 1997, : 837 - 839