A Hubble Space Telescope transit light curve for GJ 436b

被引:47
|
作者
Bean, J. L. [1 ]
Benedict, G. F. [2 ]
Charbonneau, D. [3 ]
Homeier, D. [1 ]
Taylor, D. C. [4 ]
McArthur, B. [2 ]
Seifahrt, A. [1 ]
Dreizler, S. [1 ]
Reiners, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Inst Astrophys, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Texas Austin, McDonald Observ, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Harvard Smithsonian Ctr Astrophys, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Space Telescope Sci Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
techniques : photometric; eclipses; stars : individual : GJ 436; stars : planetary systems;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361:200810013
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We present time series photometry for six partial transits of GJ 436b obtained with the Fine Guidance Sensor instrument on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). Our analysis of these data yields independent estimates of the host star's radius R-* = 0.505(-0.029) (+0.020) R-circle dot, and the planet's orbital period P = 2.643882(-0.000058)(+0.000060) d, orbital inclination i = 85.80 degrees(-0.25 degrees),(+ 0.21 degrees), mean central transit time T-c = 2 454 455.279241(-0.00025)(+0.00026) HJD, and radius Rp = 4.90(-0.33)(+ 0.45) R-circle plus. The radius we determine for the planet is larger than the previous findings from analyses of an infrared light curve obtained with the Spitzer Space Telescope. Although this discrepancy has a 92% formal significance (1.7s), it might be indicative of systematic errors that still influence the analyses of even the highest-precision transit light curves. Comparisons of all the measured radii to theoretical models suggest that GJ 436b has a H/ He envelope of similar to 10% by mass. We point out the similarities in structure between this planet and Uranus and Neptune and discuss possible parallels between these planets' formation environments and dynamical evolution. We also find that the transit times for GJ 436b are constant to within 10s over the 11 planetary orbits that the HST data span. However, the ensemble of published values exhibits a long-term drift and our mean transit time is 128 s later than that expected from the Spitzer ephemeris. The sparseness of the currently available data hinders distinguishing between an error in the orbital period or perturbations arising from an additional object in the system as the cause of the apparent trend. Assuming the drift is due to an error in the orbital period we obtain an improved estimate for it of P = 2.643904 +/- 0.000005 d. This value and our measured transit times will serve as important benchmarks in future studies of the GJ 436 system.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1046
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nonthermal Atmospheric Loss of the Exoplanet GJ 436b due to H2 Dissociation Processes
    A. A. Avtaeva
    V. I. Shematovich
    Solar System Research, 2021, 55 : 150 - 158
  • [32] Transit Timing Observations of the Extrasolar Hot-Neptune Planet GL 436b
    Stringfellow, Guy S.
    Coughlin, Jeffrey L.
    Lopez-Morales, Mercedes
    Becker, Andrew C.
    Krajci, Tom
    Mezzalira, Fabio
    Agol, Eric
    COOL STARS, STELLAR SYSTEMS AND THE SUN, 2009, 1094 : 481 - +
  • [33] Orbital misalignment of the Neptune-mass exoplanet GJ 436b with the spin of its cool star
    Vincent Bourrier
    Christophe Lovis
    Hervé Beust
    David Ehrenreich
    Gregory W. Henry
    Nicola Astudillo-Defru
    Romain Allart
    Xavier Bonfils
    Damien Ségransan
    Xavier Delfosse
    Heather M. Cegla
    Aurélien Wyttenbach
    Kevin Heng
    Baptiste Lavie
    Francesco Pepe
    Nature, 2018, 553 : 477 - 480
  • [34] A SPITZER TRANSMISSION SPECTRUM FOR THE EXOPLANET GJ 436b, EVIDENCE FOR STELLAR VARIABILITY, AND CONSTRAINTS ON DAYSIDE FLUX VARIATIONS
    Knutson, Heather A.
    Madhusudhan, Nikku
    Cowan, Nicolas B.
    Christiansen, Jessie L.
    Agol, Eric
    Deming, Drake
    Desert, Jean-Michel
    Charbonneau, David
    Henry, Gregory W.
    Homeier, Derek
    Langton, Jonathan
    Laughlin, Gregory
    Seager, Sara
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 735 (01):
  • [35] HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE - LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL
    ANDERSON, GC
    NATURE, 1990, 345 (6277) : 650 - 650
  • [36] PHOTOMETRIC FOLLOW-UP OBSERVATIONS OF THE TRANSITING NEPTUNE-MASS PLANET GJ 436b
    Shporer, Avi
    Mazeh, Tsevi
    Pont, Frederic
    Winn, Joshua N.
    Holman, Matthew J.
    Latham, David W.
    Esquerdo, Gilbert A.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 694 (02): : 1559 - 1565
  • [37] Nonthermal Atmospheric Loss of the Exoplanet GJ 436b due to H2 Dissociation Processes
    Avtaeva, A. A.
    Shematovich, V. I.
    SOLAR SYSTEM RESEARCH, 2021, 55 (02) : 150 - 158
  • [38] The Hubble PanCET program: an extensive search for metallic ions in the exosphere of GJ 436 b
    dos Santos, L. A.
    Ehrenreich, D.
    Bourrier, V
    des Etangs, A. Lecavelier
    Lopez-Morales, M.
    Sing, D. K.
    Ballester, G.
    Ben-Jaffel, L.
    Buchhave, L. A.
    Munoz, A. Garcia
    Henry, G. W.
    Kataria, T.
    Lavie, B.
    Lavvas, P.
    Lewis, N. K.
    Mikal-Evans, T.
    Sanz-Forcada, J.
    Wakeford, H.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2019, 629
  • [39] Orbital misalignment of the Neptune-mass exoplanet GJ 436b with the spin of its cool star
    Bourrier, Vincent
    Lovis, Christophe
    Beust, Herve
    Ehrenreich, David
    Henry, Gregory W.
    Astudillo-Defru, Nicola
    Allart, Romain
    Bonfils, Xavier
    Segransan, Damien
    Delfosse, Xavier
    Cegla, Heather M.
    Wyttenbach, Aurelien
    Heng, Kevin
    Lavie, Baptiste
    Pepe, Francesco
    NATURE, 2018, 553 (7689) : 477 - +
  • [40] HELIUM ATMOSPHERES ON WARM NEPTUNE- AND SUB-NEPTUNE-SIZED EXOPLANETS AND APPLICATIONS TO GJ 436b
    Hu, Renyu
    Seager, Sara
    Yung, Yuk L.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 807 (01):