Combined short- and long-axis ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is superior to conventional techniques: A cross-over randomized controlled manikin trial

被引:13
|
作者
Takeshita, Jun [1 ]
Nishiyama, Kei [1 ]
Beppu, Satoru [1 ]
Sasahashi, Nozomu [1 ]
Shime, Nobuaki [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hosp Org, Kyoto Med Ctr, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, Hiroshima, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 12期
关键词
INTERNAL JUGULAR-VEIN; CANNULATION; PLACEMENT; GUIDANCE; SUCCESS; COMPLICATIONS; MAXIMIZE; VIEW;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0189258
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives Visualizing the needle tip using the short-axis (SA) ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization approach can be challenging. It has been suggested to start the process with the SA approach and then switch to the long-axis (LA); however, to our knowledge, this combination has not been evaluated. We compared the combined short-and long-axis (SLA) approach with the SA approach in a manikin study. Methods We performed a prospective randomized controlled cross-over study in an urban emergency department and intensive care unit. Resident physicians in post-graduate years 1-2 performed a simulated ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture using the SA and SLA approaches on manikins. Twenty resident physicians were randomly assigned to two equal groups: (1) one group performed punctures using the SA approach followed by SLA; and (2) the other performed the same procedures in the opposite order. We compared the success rate and procedure duration for the two approaches. Procedural success was defined as insertion of the guide-wire into the vein while visualizing the needle tip at the time of anterior wall puncture, without penetrating the posterior wall. Results Six resident physicians (30%) performed both approaches successfully, while 12 (60%) performed the SLA approach, but not the SA, successfully. Those who performed the SA approach successfully also succeeded with the SLA approach. Two resident physicians (10%) failed to perform both approaches. The SLA approach had a significantly higher success rate than the SA approach (P < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) procedure duration was 59.5 [46.0-88.5] seconds and 45.0 [37.5-84.0] seconds for the SLA and SA approaches, respectively. The difference of the duration between the two procedures was 15.5 [0-28.5] seconds. There was no significant difference in duration between the two approaches (P = 0.12). Conclusions Using the SLA approach significantly improved the success rate of internal jugular vein puncture performed by novice physicians on a manikin model, without increasing procedural duration. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the procedure's utility in actual patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is Long-Axis View Superior to Short-Axis View in Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization?
    Vogel, Jody A.
    Haukoos, Jason S.
    Erickson, Catherine L.
    Liao, Michael M.
    Theoret, Jonathan
    Sanz, Geoffrey E.
    Kendall, John
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (04) : 832 - 839
  • [2] Comparing Combined Short-Axis and Long-Axis Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization update, With Conventional Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approaches
    Takeshita, Jun
    Nishiyama, Kei
    Fukumoto, Atsushi
    Shime, Nobuaki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2019, 33 (04) : 1029 - 1034
  • [3] Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial
    Takeshita, Jun
    Nakajima, Yasufumi
    Tachibana, Kazuya
    Hamaba, Hirofumi
    Yamashita, Tomonori
    Shime, Nobuaki
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (09):
  • [4] Combined Approach Versus 2 Conventional Approaches in Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Takeshita, Jun
    Nishiyama, Kei
    Fukumoto, Atsushi
    Shime, Nobuaki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2019, 33 (11) : 2979 - 2984
  • [5] Comparison of dynamic needle tip positioning versus conventional long-axis in-plane techniques for ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous catheterization: a randomized controlled trial
    Lee, Seohee
    Chang, Jee-Eun
    Oh, Yoomin
    Yang, Hyo-Jun
    Bae, Jinyoung
    Cho, Youn-Joung
    Jeon, Yunseok
    Nam, Karam
    Kim, Tae-Kyong
    [J]. MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2021, 87 (03) : 294 - 301
  • [6] Long-Axis In-Plane Approach Versus Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial*
    Takeshita, Jun
    Tachibana, Kazuya
    Nakajima, Yasufumi
    Nagai, Gaku
    Fujiwara, Ai
    Hamaba, Hirofumi
    Matsuura, Hideki
    Yamashita, Tomonori
    Shime, Nobuaki
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (11) : E996 - E1001
  • [7] Long-axis in-plane combined with short-axis out-of-plane technique in ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization in infants: A randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Ziyi
    Guo, Hongjie
    Shi, Shujun
    Xu, Ying
    Ye, Mao
    Bai, Lin
    Tan, Yanzhe
    Li, Yihui
    Liu, Lifei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2023, 85
  • [8] Combined short- and long-axis method for internal jugular vein catheterization in premature newborns: A randomized controlled trial
    Liu, Wei
    Tu, Zhenzhen
    Liu, Lifei
    Tan, Yanzhe
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 65 (03) : 420 - 427
  • [9] Long-Axis Versus Short-Axis View of Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Cannulation Reply
    Vogel, Jody A.
    Kendall, John
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (12) : E597 - E598
  • [10] Short- vs long-axis approach to ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access: a prospective randomized study
    Mahler, Simon A.
    Wang, Hao
    Lester, Chadwick
    Skinner, Janice
    Arnold, Thomas C.
    Conrad, Steven A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 29 (09): : 1194 - 1197