Long-axis in-plane combined with short-axis out-of-plane technique in ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization in infants: A randomized controlled trial

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Ziyi [1 ]
Guo, Hongjie [1 ]
Shi, Shujun [1 ]
Xu, Ying [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ye, Mao [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Bai, Lin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tan, Yanzhe [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Li, Yihui [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Lifei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Childrens Hosp, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Clin Res Ctr Child Hlth & Disorders, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Educ Key Lab Child Dev & Disorders, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Key Lab Pediat, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[5] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Childrens Hosp, 136 Zhongshan Er Rd, Chongqing 400014, Peoples R China
关键词
Ultrasound-guided; Radial artery catheterization; Infant; CANNULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.111038
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: To determine whether the long-axis in-plane (LAX-IP) combined with short-axis out-of-plane (SAX-OOP) technique is more suitable than modified dynamic needle tip positioning (MDNTP) technique for ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization in infants.Design: A randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Patients: Overall, 72 patients, aged 1-12 months old, who were primarily undergoing thoracic or cardiac surgery in the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between July 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022, were selected. These patients were randomly divided into two groups: i) the MDNTP group and ii) the LAX-IP com-bined with SAX-OOP group. Interventions: Radial artery cannulation in the two groups was performed using ultrasound-guided MDNTP or LAX-IP combined with SAX-OOP technique.Measurements: The primary outcome was first-time success rate, and the secondary outcomes included total success rate, cannulation time, and incidence of complications. Main results: In the LAX-IP combined with SAX-OOP group, the first-time success rate was 75.0% (n = 27), total success rate was 97.2% (n = 35), cannulation time was 91.39 +/- 102.60 s, puncture attempts was 1.5 +/- 1.3 times, and local hematoma was formed on the first day in one (2.8%) infant. In the MDNTP group, the first-time success rate was 36.1% (n = 13) (P = 0.001; RR, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.34), total success rate was 91.7% (n = 33) (P = 0.303; RR, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.19), cannulation time was 181.00 +/- 146.72 s(P = 0.047; Median difference,-89.61; 95% confidence interval,-149.12 to-30.10), puncture attempts was 2.3 +/- 1.6 times (P = 0.133; Median difference,-0.81), and local hematoma was formed on the first day in nine (25%) infants (P = 0.006; RR, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.83). No thrombosis occurred in any group.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combined short-axis out-of-plane and long-axis in-plane approach versus long-axis in-plane approach for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in infants and small children: A randomized controlled trial
    Takeshita, Jun
    Nakajima, Yasufumi
    Tachibana, Kazuya
    Hamaba, Hirofumi
    Yamashita, Tomonori
    Shime, Nobuaki
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (09):
  • [2] Short-axis/out-of-plane or long-axis/in-plane ultrasound-guided arterial cannulation in children A randomised controlled trial
    Song, In-Kyung
    Choi, Jung-Yoon
    Lee, Ji-Hyun
    Kim, Eun-Hee
    Kim, Hyun-Jung
    Kim, Hee-Soo
    Kim, Jin-Tae
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (07) : 522 - 527
  • [3] Comparison of short-axis out-of-plane versus long-axis in-plane ultrasound-guided radial arterial cannulation in adult patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Sameer Sethi
    Souvik Maitra
    Vikas Saini
    Tanvir Samra
    S. K. Malhotra
    [J]. Journal of Anesthesia, 2017, 31 : 89 - 94
  • [4] Comparison of short-axis out-of-plane versus long-axis in-plane ultrasound-guided radial arterial cannulation in adult patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Sethi, Sameer
    Maitra, Souvik
    Saini, Vikas
    Samra, Tanvir
    Malhotra, S. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2017, 31 (01) : 89 - 94
  • [5] Long-Axis In-Plane Approach Versus Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial*
    Takeshita, Jun
    Tachibana, Kazuya
    Nakajima, Yasufumi
    Nagai, Gaku
    Fujiwara, Ai
    Hamaba, Hirofumi
    Matsuura, Hideki
    Yamashita, Tomonori
    Shime, Nobuaki
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (11) : E996 - E1001
  • [6] Comparing Combined Short-Axis and Long-Axis Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization update, With Conventional Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approaches
    Takeshita, Jun
    Nishiyama, Kei
    Fukumoto, Atsushi
    Shime, Nobuaki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2019, 33 (04) : 1029 - 1034
  • [7] Ultrasound-guided short-axis out-of-plane vs. long-axis in-plane technique for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, H-H
    Wang, J-J
    Chen, W-T
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (06) : 1914 - 1922
  • [8] Comparison between the long-axis/in-plane and short-axis/out-of-plane approaches for ultrasound-guided vascular catheterization: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Liu, Chao
    Mao, Zhi
    Kang, Hongjun
    Hu, Xin
    Jiang, Shengmao
    Hu, Pan
    Hu, Jie
    Zhou, Feihu
    [J]. THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, 14 : 331 - 340
  • [9] Modified Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Ultrasound Versus Conventional Long-Axis In-Plane Ultrasound to Guide Radial Artery Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Quan, ZheFeng
    Tian, Ming
    Chi, Ping
    Cao, YingHao
    Li, Xin
    Peng, KeJun
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2014, 119 (01): : 163 - 169
  • [10] Comparison between the long-axis in-plane and short-axis out-of-plane approaches for ultrasound-guided arterial cannulation: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Lei Cao
    Yu-ting Tan
    Ting Wei
    Hong Li
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 23