Development of Perceived Complex Problem-Solving Instrument in Domain of Complex Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Nagahi, Morteza [1 ]
Maddah, Alieh [2 ]
Jaradat, Raed [1 ]
Mohammadi, Mohammad [2 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Humanities Fac, Dept Management, Birjand Branch, Birjand 9717711111, Iran
来源
SYSTEMS | 2021年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词
complex problem-solving; systems thinking; systems thinking skills/preferences; perceived complex problem-solving instrument; complex systems; exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis; scale development; SEM; DECISION-MAKING; EMPIRICAL VALIDATION; THINKING; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.3390/systems9030051
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The ability to solve modern complex systems becomes a necessity of the 21st century. The purpose of this study is the development of an instrument that measures an individual's perception toward solving complex problems. Based on literature and definitions, an instrument with four stages named perceived complex problem-solving (PCPS) was designed through exploratory and confirmatory stages. The instrument is validated and scaled through different models, and the final model is discussed. After completing validation and scale development of the PCPS instrument, the final model of the PCPS instrument was introduced to resolve the gap in the literature. The final model of the PCPS instrument is able to find and quantify the degree of perception an individual holds in dealing with complex problems and can be utilized in different settings and environments. Further research about the relationship between Systems Thinking and CPS revealed individuals with a high level of systems thinking have a better understanding of the characteristics of complex problems and so better perception of CPS.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION IN INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS FOR DIAGNOSTIC PROBLEM-SOLVING IN COMPLEX DYNAMIC DOMAINS
    VASANDANI, V
    GOVINDARAJ, T
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1995, 25 (07): : 1076 - 1096
  • [42] Reconstructive Paradigms: A Problem-Solving Approach in Complex Tissue Defects
    Grosu-Bularda, Andreea
    Hodea, Florin-Vlad
    Cretu, Andrei
    Lita, Flavia-Francesca
    Bordeanu-Diaconescu, Eliza-Maria
    Vancea, Cristian-Vladimir
    Lascar, Ioan
    Popescu, Serban Arghir
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [43] Engaging students with multiple problem-solving pathways for complex problems
    Yuriev, Elizabeth
    Burton, John
    Devine, Shane
    Vo, Kimberly
    Maher, Sheryl
    Thompson, Christopher
    Scanlon, Martin
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 257
  • [44] Tolerance for Uncertainty and Patterns of DecisionMaking in Complex Problem-Solving Strategies
    Epishin, Vitalii
    Bogacheva, Nataliya
    MULTIMODAL TECHNOLOGIES AND INTERACTION, 2020, 4 (03) : 1 - 21
  • [45] ENGINEERING STUDENTS' PERCEPTION ON DEVELOPING COMPLEX PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS
    Lungu, Remus
    Sava, Adriana
    Noveanu, Simona
    Suteu, Sorin
    Firescu, Violeta
    ACTA TECHNICA NAPOCENSIS SERIES-APPLIED MATHEMATICS MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 66 (04): : 511 - 520
  • [46] Problem-solving test:: The role of a chromatin-remodeling complex
    Szeberenyi, Jozsef
    BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2007, 35 (03) : 219 - 220
  • [47] The Influence of Emotion and Emotion Regulation on Complex Problem-Solving Performance
    Guss, C. Dominik
    Starker, Ulrike
    SYSTEMS, 2023, 11 (06):
  • [48] Characteristics of fluent skills in a complex, dynamic problem-solving task
    Sohn, MH
    Douglass, SA
    Chen, MC
    Anderson, JR
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2005, 47 (04) : 742 - 752
  • [49] DEVELOPMENT OF DISTRIBUTED PROBLEM-SOLVING SYSTEMS FOR DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS
    LEKKAS, GP
    AVOURIS, NM
    PAPAKONSTANTINOU, GK
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1995, 25 (03): : 400 - 414
  • [50] PROBLEM-SOLVING BY EXPERTS OUTSIDE THEIR DOMAIN
    PATEL, VL
    GROEN, GJ
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1986, 24 (05) : 324 - 324