Evolutionary multiobjective design of fuzzy rule-based systems

被引:16
|
作者
Ishibuchi, Hisao [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Prefecture Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Intelligent Syst, Osaka, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1109/FOCI.2007.372141
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The main advantage of fuzzy rule-based systems over other non-linear models such as neural networks is their high interpretability. Fuzzy rules can be usually interpreted in a linguistic manner because they are described by linguistic values such as small and large. Fuzzy rule-based systems have high accuracy as well as high interpretability. A large number of tuning methods have been proposed to improve their accuracy. Most of those tuning methods are based on learning algorithms of neural networks and/or evolutionary optimization techniques. Accuracy improvement of fuzzy rule-based systems, however, is usually achieved at the cost of interpretability. This is because the accuracy improvement often increases the complexity of fuzzy rute-based systems. Thus one important issue in the design of fuzzy rule-based systems is to find a good tradeoff between the accuracy and the complexity. The importance of finding a good accuracy-complexity tradeoff has been pointed out in some studies in the late 1990s. Recently evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms were used to search for various fuzzy rule-based systems with different accuracy-complexity tradeoffs. Users are supposed to choose a final model based on their preference from the obtained fuzzy rule-based systems. Some users may prefer a simple one with high interpretability. Other users may prefer a complicated one with high accuracy. In this paper, we explain evolutionary multiobjective approaches to the design of accurate and interpretable fuzzy rule-based systems. We also suggest some future research directions related to the evolutionary multiobjective design of fuzzy rule-based systems.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A two-stage evolutionary process for designing TSK fuzzy rule-based systems
    Cordón, O
    Herrera, F
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 1999, 29 (06): : 703 - 715
  • [22] Adaptive fuzzy rule-based classification systems
    Nozaki, K
    Ishibuchi, H
    Tanaka, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 1996, 4 (03) : 238 - 250
  • [23] Decoupling of multivariable rule-based fuzzy systems
    Babuska, R
    Gegov, A
    Verbruggen, HB
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN REAL-TIME CONTROL 1998, 1999, : 13 - 16
  • [24] Descriptive Stability of Fuzzy Rule-Based Systems
    Mencar, Corrado
    Castiello, Ciro
    [J]. IEEE CIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS 2021 (FUZZ-IEEE), 2021,
  • [25] Matrix formulation of fuzzy rule-based systems
    Lotfi, A
    Andersen, HC
    Tsoi, AC
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 1996, 26 (02): : 332 - 340
  • [26] Probabilistic reasoning in fuzzy rule-based systems
    van den Berg, J
    Kaymak, U
    van den Bergh, WM
    [J]. SOFT METHODS IN PROBABILITY, STATISTICS AND DATA ANALYSIS, 2002, : 189 - 196
  • [27] Visualization of evolving fuzzy rule-based systems
    Henzgen, Sascha
    Strickert, Marc
    Hullermeier, Eyke
    [J]. EVOLVING SYSTEMS, 2014, 5 (03) : 175 - 191
  • [28] Analogous fuzzy rule-based expert systems
    Vadiee, N
    AkbarzadehT, MR
    [J]. FUZZ-IEEE '96 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-3, 1996, : 1852 - 1857
  • [29] Design schemes for rule-based systems
    Chander, PG
    Radhakrishnan, T
    Shinghal, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXPERT SYSTEMS, 1997, 10 (01): : 1 - 36
  • [30] Counterfactual rule generation for fuzzy rule-based classification systems
    Zhang, Te
    Wagner, Christian
    Garibaldi, Jonathan. M.
    [J]. 2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2022,