Risk score system for late aortic events in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection

被引:16
|
作者
Matsushita, Akihito [1 ,2 ]
Tabata, Minoru [3 ]
Mihara, Wahei [1 ]
Shimamoto, Takeshi [4 ]
Komiya, Tatsuhiko [4 ]
Takanashi, Shuichiro [5 ]
Tobaru, Tetsuya [6 ]
Nakao, Tatsuya [7 ]
Nakamura, Sunao [8 ]
Sato, Yasunori [9 ]
机构
[1] Seikeikai Chiba Med Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Chiba, Japan
[2] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Global Clin Res, Chiba, Japan
[3] Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Med Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Chiba, Japan
[4] Kurashiki Cent Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Okayama, Japan
[5] Sakakibara Heart Inst, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Sakakibara Heart Inst, Dept Cardiol, Tokyo, Japan
[7] New Tokyo Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Chiba, Japan
[8] New Tokyo Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Chiba, Japan
[9] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, Tokyo, Japan
来源
关键词
uncomplicated; acute type B aortic dissection; aortic events; predictors; FALSE-LUMEN; TEAR SIZE; MANAGEMENT; GROWTH; REPAIR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.06.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Several risk factors for late aortic events in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (UTBAD) have been reported; however, they remain controversial. We developed and validated a new risk prediction score system for late aortic events in patients with UTBAD. Methods: We reviewed 187 consecutive patients diagnosed with UTBAD from 2004 to 2017 at 2 centers (derivation cohort) and 219 consecutive patients diagnosed with UTBAD from 2012 to 2016 in 4 other centers (validation cohort). We explored predictors of late aortic events using Fine-Gray generalization of the proportional hazards model, then developed a risk prediction score model and determined the test reliability using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analyses. Finally, we validated the model using external multicenter data. Results: The risk prediction score system was developed using the following independent predictors: initial aortic diameter of >= 40 mm (2 points), false lumen diameter larger than true lumen diameter (2 points), ulcer-like projection (1 point), and age >= 70 years (1 point). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that a cut-off total additive score of 2 points. In the validation cohort, the low-risk group (score, 0-1 point) demonstrated lower 1- and 3-year incidence rates of late aortic events than the high-risk group (score, 2-6 points) (0.9% vs 32.5% and 0.9% vs 47.1%, respectively; P<.0001). Conclusions: We developed a simple risk prediction score system for late aortic events in patients with UTBAD. High-risk patients can be identified using our model, and they should be closely monitored and considered for interventions at the appropriate timing.
引用
收藏
页码:2173 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis of Aortic Growth Rates in Uncomplicated Type B Dissection
    Hosn, Maen Aboul
    Goffredo, Paolo
    Zavala, Jeffrey
    Sharp, William J.
    Katragunta, Neelima
    Kresowik, Timothy
    Nicholson, Rachael
    Pascarella, Luigi
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 48 : 133 - 140
  • [32] The new indication of TEVAR for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection
    Song, Chao
    Lu, Qingsheng
    Zhou, Jian
    Yu, Guanyu
    Feng, Xiang
    Zhao, Zhiqing
    Bao, Junmin
    Feng, Rui
    Jing, Zaiping
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (25)
  • [33] Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: Challenges in Diagnosis and Categorization
    Bashir, Mohamad
    Tan, Sven Zcp
    Jubouri, Matti
    Coselli, Joseph
    Chen, Edward P.
    Mohammed, Idhrees
    Velayudhan, Bashi
    Sadeghipour, Parham
    Nienaber, Christoph
    Awad, Wael I.
    Slisatkorn, Worawong
    Wong, Randolph
    Piffaretti, Gabrielle
    Mariscalco, Giovanni
    Bailey, Damian M.
    Williams, Ian
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 94 : 92 - 101
  • [34] Analysis of Aortic Growth Rates in Uncomplicated Type B Dissection
    Aboul Hosn, Maen
    Goffredo, Paolo
    Zavala, Jeffrey
    Kresowik, Timothy
    Nicholson, Rachael
    Pascarella, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 64 (03) : 869 - 869
  • [35] Reintervention after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection
    Cheng, Li
    Xiang, Dongqiao
    Zhang, Shan
    Zheng, Chuansheng
    Wu, Xiaoyan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [36] Aortic Remodeling After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Nonacute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection
    Nomura, Yoshikatsu
    Kawasaki, Ryota
    Koide, Yutaka
    Okada, Tasuku
    Yasumori, Ken
    Sakamoto, Toshihito
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Murakami, Hirohisa
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 99 : 209 - 216
  • [37] Risk profile analysis of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair: Laboratory and radiographic predictors
    Geragotellis, Alexander
    Al-Tawil, Mohammed
    Jubouri, Matti
    Tan, Sven Z. C. P.
    Williams, Ian
    Bashir, Mohamad
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (09) : 2811 - 2820
  • [38] Commentary: Risk scores to predict aortic events in uncomplicated Stanford type B dissection: Simple, simpler, too simple?
    Schoenhoff, Florian
    Carrel, Thierry
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 159 (06): : 2184 - 2184
  • [39] Computed Tomography Imaging Features in Acute Uncomplicated Stanford Type-B Aortic Dissection Predict Late Adverse Events
    Sailer, Anna M.
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Nelemans, Patricia J.
    Chin, Anne S.
    Kino, Aya
    Huininga, Mark
    Schmidt, Johanna
    Mistelbauer, Gabriel
    Baeumler, Kathrin
    Chiu, Peter
    Fischbein, Michael P.
    Dake, Michael D.
    Miller, D. Craig
    Schurink, Geert Willem H.
    Fleischmann, Dominik
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2017, 10 (04)
  • [40] Discordance of aortic remodeling with clinical outcomes in patients treated with endovascular repair for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection
    Miller, Larry E.
    Pierson, Lee M.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 13 (02) : 203 - 204