IMPACT OF REVISION OF THE LR-M CRITERIA ON THE DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND LI-RADS

被引:17
|
作者
Ding, Jianmin [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Zhengyi [1 ]
Zhou, Yan [1 ]
Zhou, Hongyu [1 ]
Zhang, Qin [3 ]
Wang, Yandong [1 ]
Jing, Xiang [1 ]
Wang, Fengmei [4 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Third Cent Hosp, Tianjin Inst Hepatobiliary Dis, Tianjin Key Lab Artificial Cell, Artificial Cell Engn Technol Res Ctr Publ Hlth Mi, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ, Cent Clin Coll 3, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Third Cent Hosp, Dept Pathol, Tianjin Inst Hepatobiliary Dis, Tianjin Key Lab Artificial Cell,Artificial Cell E, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[4] Tianjin Third Cent Hosp, Tianjin Inst Hepatobiliary Dis, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Tianjin Key Lab Artificial Cell,Artificial Cell E, Tianjin, Peoples R China
来源
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2021年 / 47卷 / 12期
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Ultrasonography; Contrast agent; Liver cirrhosis; Diagnostic techniques and procedures; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; CIRRHOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.08.007
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
This study was aimed at revising the LI-RADS M category (LR-M) criteria to improve the diagnostic performance categories LR-5 and LR-M of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2017. We enrolled 264 patients (264 nodules) with a risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The nodules were assigned specific CEUS LI-RADS categories. Washout onset times for all nodules were noted. The diagnostic performance of LR-5 and LR-M was analyzed based on the different early washout criterion for the LR-M category. The positive predictive values in LR-5, LR-4 and LR-3 were 98.6%, 72.2% and 16.7%, respectively, and that for non-HCC malignancies in LR-M was 25.0%. Patients in the LR-M category were reclassified using 45 s as the early washout criterion. LR-5 had higher sensitivity (65.5% vs. 76.2%, p = 0.012) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.80 vs. 0.85, p = 0.001) for HCC diagnosis after reclassification. LR-M also had higher specificity (71.4% vs. 81.3%, p = 0.010) in diagnosing nonHCC malignancies after reclassification. Our findings suggest CEUS LR-5 is effective for HCC diagnosis. The use of 45 s as the time criterion of early washout for LR-M can improve LR-5 and LR-M performance in the diagnosis of HCC and non-HCC malignancies, respectively. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:3403 / 3410
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LI-RADS M (LR-M) criteria and reporting algorithm of v2018: diagnostic values in the assessment of primary liver cancers on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Min Young Kim
    Ijin Joo
    Hyo Jin Kang
    Jae Seok Bae
    Sun Kyung Jeon
    Jeong Min Lee
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 2440 - 2448
  • [22] LI-RADS M (LR-M) criteria and reporting algorithm of v2018: diagnostic values in the assessment of primary liver cancers on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Kim, Min Young
    Joo, Ijin
    Kang, Hyo Jin
    Seok, Jae
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Lee, Jeong Min
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (08) : 2440 - 2448
  • [23] The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis B
    Dan Yang
    Hong Hu
    Rui Li
    Chun-Lin Tang
    Kuan-Sheng Ma
    De-Yu Guo
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 630 - 639
  • [24] The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis B
    Yang, Dan
    Hu, Hong
    Li, Rui
    Tang, Chun-Lin
    Ma, Kuan-Sheng
    Guo, De-Yu
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (02) : 630 - 639
  • [25] Quantification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Vascular Dynamics With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for LI-RADS Implementation
    Krolak, Connor
    Dighe, Manjiri
    Clark, Alicia
    Shumaker, Marissa
    Yeung, Raymond
    Barr, Richard G.
    Kono, Yuko
    Averkiou, Michalakis
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2024, 59 (04) : 337 - 344
  • [26] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS)
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Potthoff, Andrej
    Helmberger, Thomas
    Ignee, Andre
    Willmann, Juergen K.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2018, 56 (05): : 499 - 506
  • [27] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound LI-RADS LR-5 in Hepatic Tuberculosis: Case Report and Literature Review of Imaging Features
    Forgione, Antonella
    Tovoli, Francesco
    Ravaioli, Matteo
    Renzulli, Matteo
    Vasuri, Francesco
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    Granito, Alessandro
    GASTROENTEROLOGY INSIGHTS, 2021, 12 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [28] Training on contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS classification for resident radiologists: a retrospective comparison of performance after training
    Dai, Ting
    Zhu, Hongjing
    Qiao, Meng
    Song, Yuxuan
    Sun, Yu
    Meng, Xia
    Sun, Zhixia
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [29] VALUE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND LI-RADS 2017 IN PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: A COMPARISON STUDY WITH CT/MRI LI-RADS
    Ding, Jianmin
    Zhou, Yan
    Jing, Xiang
    HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 72 : 687A - 687A
  • [30] Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kierans, Andrea S.
    Song, Christopher
    Gavlin, Alexander
    Roudenko, Alexandra
    Lu, Lina
    Askin, Gulce
    Hecht, Elizabeth M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (05) : 1085 - 1092