The effect of ovarian stimulation on aneuploidy of early aborted tissues and preimplantation blastocysts: comparison of the GnRH agonist long protocol with the GnRH antagonist protocol

被引:8
|
作者
Wang, Jun [1 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
Zhao, Nan [1 ]
Ma, Yuan [1 ]
Wang, Xiyi [1 ]
Gou, Xingqing [1 ]
Ju, Ying [1 ]
Zhang, Hengde [1 ]
Chen, Shuqiang [1 ]
Wang, Xiaohong [1 ]
机构
[1] Air Force Mil Med Univ, Ctr Reprod Med, Dept Gynecol & Obster, Tang Du Hosp, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol; GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol; Aneuploidy; Early abortion; Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT); OXIDATIVE STRESS; OOCYTES; EMBRYOS; EGGS; ATP; AGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-022-02557-2
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare aneuploidy rates in early aborted tissues or blastocysts between in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles after the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol or the GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study from a university-affiliated fertility center. In total, 550 early miscarriage patients who conceived through IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) after receiving the GnRH-ant or GnRH-a long protocol were analyzed to compare aneuploidy rates in early aborted tissues. To compare aneuploidy rates in blastocysts, 404 preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles with the GnRH-ant protocol or GnRH-a long protocol were also analyzed. Results For early miscarriage patients who conceived through IVF/ICSI, compared to the GnRH-a long protocol group, the GnRH-ant protocol group had a significantly higher rate of aneuploidy in early aborted tissues (48.51% vs. 64.19%). Regarding PGT-A cycles, the rate of blastocyst aneuploidy was significantly higher in the GnRH-ant protocol group than the GnRH-a long protocol group (39.69% vs. 52.27%). After stratification and multiple linear regression, the GnRH-ant regimen remained significantly associated with an increased risk of aneuploidy in early aborted tissues and blastocysts [OR (95% CI) 1.81 (1.21, 2.71), OR (95% CI) 1.65 (1.13, 2.42)]. Furthermore, the blastocyst aneuploidy rate in the GnRH-ant protocol group was significantly higher but only in young and normal ovarian responders [OR (95% CI) 5.07 (1.99, 12.92)]. Conclusion Compared to the GnRH-a long protocol, the GnRH-ant protocol is associated with a higher aneuploidy rate in early aborted tissues and blastocysts. These results should be confirmed in a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
引用
收藏
页码:1927 / 1936
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pregnancy outcomes of progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol, GnRH antagonist protocol and GnRH agonist protocol for young patients undergoing PGT-M
    Li, Y.
    Zhao, W.
    Liang, X.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 411 - 411
  • [22] Euploidy rates among preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles with oral dydrogesterone primed ovarian stimulation or GnRH antagonist protocol
    Yang, Lanlin
    Luo, Keli
    Lu, Guangxiu
    Lin, Ge
    Gong, Fei
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 45 (04) : 721 - 726
  • [23] Comparison of the Effects and Safety of Mild Ovarian Stimulation and Conventional Ovarian Stimulation with A Long GnRH Agonist Protocol on IVF Outcomes
    Rong-rong TAN
    Dan-hua PU
    Jia-yin LIU
    Jie WU
    Journal of Reproduction and Contraception, 2013, (03) : 159 - 172
  • [24] Comparison of the standard GnRH antagonist protocol and the luteal phase estradiol/GnRH antagonist priming protocol in poor ovarian responders
    Mutlu, Mehmet Firat
    Mutlu, Ilknur
    Erdem, Mehmet
    Guler, Ismail
    Erdem, Ahmet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 47 (02) : 470 - 475
  • [25] Comparison between a GnRH agonist and a GnRH antagonist protocol for the same patient undergoing IVF
    Yufeng Li
    Yuan Li
    Qiaohong Lai
    Hanwang Zhang
    Guijin Zhu
    Lei Jin
    Jing Yue
    Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences], 2008, 28 : 618 - 620
  • [26] Comparison between a GnRH Agonist and a GnRH Antagonist Protocol for the Same Patient Undergoing IVF
    Li, Yufeng
    Li, Yuan
    Lai, Qiaohong
    Zhang, Hanwang
    Zhu, Guijin
    Jin, Lei
    Yue, Jing
    JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 28 (05) : 618 - 620
  • [27] Comparison of the GnRH agonist and antagonist protocol on the same patients in assisted reproduction during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles
    Lai, Qiaohong
    Zhang, Hanwang
    Zhu, Guijing
    Li, Yufeng
    Jin, Lei
    He, Long
    Zhang, Zhijun
    Yang, Ping
    Yu, Qilin
    Zhang, Shu
    Xu, Jun-Fa
    Wang, Cong-Yi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 6 (09): : 1903 - 1910
  • [28] Comparisons of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF
    Pu, Danhua
    Wu, Jie
    Liu, Jiayin
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (10) : 2742 - 2749
  • [29] Comparison of clinical effects between early follicular prolonged GnRH agonist protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol in 3310 cycles: a retrospective study
    Gui, Juan
    Ni, Yuan
    Liu, Qian
    Wang, Xiaochen
    Xie, Qingzhen
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [30] Comparisons of GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Ruolin
    Lin, Shouren
    Wang, Yong
    Qian, Weiping
    Zhou, Liang
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (04):